11 U.S.C. § 941

Filing of plan

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 11 CasesGoogle Scholar

The debtor shall file a plan for the adjustment of the debtor’s debts. If such a plan is not filed with the petition, the debtor shall file such a plan at such later time as the court fixes.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1989–2017 · leading case: William Ochadleus v. City of Detroit, 838 F.3d 792 (6th Cir. 2016).
William Ochadleus v. City of Detroit, 838 F.3d 792 (6th Cir. 2016). · cites it 2× “See 11 U.S.C. §§ 941 , 942. From this they argue that a debtor municipality could refuse all but the most extreme modification, one that would necessitate a wholesale rewriting of the plan and detrimentally affect the rights of third parties, thereby satisfying the main…”
Lyda v. City of Detroit, Mich. (In Re City of Detroit, Mich.), 561 B.R. 684 (6th Cir. 2016). “11 U.S.C. §§ 941 & 942. “Neither the court nor creditors can directly force a liquidation of a municipality’s assets in bankruptcy.”
Ass'n of Retired Employees v. City of Stockton (In re City of Stockton), 478 B.R. 8 (Bankr. E.D. Cal. 2012). · cites it 2× “11 U.S.C. § 941 . Another consent is the express consent recognized in § 904 that the City has declined to give in this proceeding.”
In Re Friedland, 182 B.R. 576 (Bankr.D. Colo. 1995). “See, 11 U.S.C. §§ 941 , 1121, 1221 and 1321. 14.”
In Re City of Colorado Springs Spring Creek Gen. Improvement Dist., 187 B.R. 683 (Bankr.D. Colo. 1995). “11 U.S.C. § 941 . The general definitions found in § 101 are not ineoiporated in Chapter 9 by reference under § 901(a).”
In re City of Detroit, 576 B.R. 552 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 2017). “Establishing such a deadline is necessary because the Debtor (and the other major creditors) need to know what the nature and amounts of claims are that must be dealt with in a plan of reorganization (which, under 11 U.S.C. § 941 , is called a plan of adjustment in this Chapter…”
Deutsche Credit Corp. v. Keeler, 772 P.2d 1358 (Or. Ct. App. 1989). “11 USC §§ 941 ,1121. The plan had not been confirmed when the court entered judgment in this case.”
In re Lake Grady Road & Bridge Dist., 119 B.R. 844 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1990). “time the Court heard argument of counsel for the respective parties and now finds the facts relevant to a resolution of the matters presented as appear from the record are as follows: The Debtor filed its voluntary Petition for Relief under Chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code on…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.