U.S. Code » Title 12 » Chapter CHAPTER 13— NATIONAL HOUSING

12 U.S.C. § 205

STUDY OF HOUSING NEEDS OF GRANDPARENT-HEADED AND RELATIVE-HEADED FAMILIES.

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 12 CasesGoogle Scholar
“(a)In General.—The Secretary and the Director of the Bureau of the Census jointly shall—“(1) conduct a study to determine an estimate of the number of covered families in the United States and their affordable housing needs; and“(2) submit a report to Congress regarding the results of the study conducted under paragraph (1).“(b)Report and Recommendations.—The report required under subsection (a) shall—“(1) be submitted to Congress not later than 12 months after the date of enactment of this Act [Dec. 16, 2003]; and“(2) include recommendations by the Secretary and the Director of the Bureau of the Census regarding how the major assisted housing programs of the Department of Housing and Urban Development, including the supportive housing for the elderly program under section 202 of the Housing Act of 1959 (12 U.S.C. 1701q) can be used and, if appropriate, amended or altered, to meet the affordable housing needs of covered families.”
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1939–2014 · leading case: Madura v. Bac Home Loans Servicing, LP, 593 F. App'x 834 (11th Cir. 2014).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Madura v. Bac Home Loans Servicing, LP, 593 F. App'x 834 (11th Cir. 2014). “Madura 5 Following removal from state court, on November 4, 2011, the Maduras filed an amended complaint in federal court against BOA and BAC Home Loans, alleging violations of the Real Estate settlement Procedures Act (“RESPA”), 12 U.S.C. § 205 (b), (c), and (e). The Maduras…”
White v. Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp., 122 F.2d 770 (4th Cir. 1941). “The action of the Comptroller in permitting the bank to be opened was based upon 12 U.S.C.A. § 205 , which provides: “If the Comptroller of the Currency becomes satisfied that it may safely be done and that.”
Smith v. Witherow, 102 F.2d 638 (3rd Cir. 1939). “Its acceptance of unrestricted new deposits under the resolutions of February 18, 1933, did not alter this fact, nor did the acceptance of such deposits by the conservator under the authority of Section 206 of the Bank Conservation Act, 12 U.”
Minichello v. Saxton, 207 F. Supp. 299 (M.D. Penn. 1962). “§ 203 ) or terminate a conservatorship ( 12 U.S.C.A. § 205 ) or to approve or disapprove a sale of the assets of a bank, as here, by the directors of the First National Bank of Exeter to the Wyoming National Bank ( 12 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.