12 U.S.C. § 462
Omitted
[omitted]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1932–1967 · leading case: Michelsen v. Penney, 135 F.2d 409 (2d Cir. 1943).
Michelsen v. Penney, 135 F.2d 409 (2d Cir. 1943). “Under 12 U.S.C.A. § 462 , these balances must equal a certain percentage of the bank's deposits.”
First Agric. Nat'l Bank of Berkshire Cnty. v. State Tax Comm'n, 229 N.E.2d 245 (Mass. 1967). “270 , as amended, 12 U.S.C. § 462 (1964), placed national banks in a better position to compete with State banks for savings accounts.”
United States v. Mfrs. Hanover Trust Co., 240 F. Supp. 867 (S.D.N.Y. 1965). “12 U.S.C. §§ 462 , 462b (1958 & Supp V, 1964).”
Lucas v. Fed. Reserve Bank of Richmond, 59 F.2d 617 (4th Cir. 1932). “These were imposed under regulations adopted by the Federal Reserve Board pursuant to section 19 of the Federal Reserve Act (12 USCA §§ 462, 464); and there is no contention that they were improperly imposed or that the regulations were invalid.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.