15 U.S.C. § 1014
Effect on other laws
Nothing contained in this chapter shall be construed to affect in any manner the application to the business of insurance of the Act of
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13
cases, 1948–1996 · leading case: Doreen M. Cochran v. Paco, Inc., Clara M. Jones v. Paco, Inc., 606 F.2d 460 (5th Cir. 1979).
Doreen M. Cochran v. Paco, Inc., Clara M. Jones v. Paco, Inc., 606 F.2d 460 (5th Cir. 1979). “9 Moreover, 15 U.S.C. § 1014 makes the National Labor Relations Act and the Fair Labor Standards Act specifically applicable to the business of insurance, also demonstrating Congress’ intent to leave the states free to regulate insurance in areas having no relationship to…”
Sylvia Perry, Individually & on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Fid. Union Life Ins. Co., 606 F.2d 468 (5th Cir. 1979). “Nowhere in TIL is there the equivalent of § 4 of the McCarran Act, 12 15 U.S.C.A. § 1014 , which specifically relates TIL’s provisions to the business of insurance.”
A. Alexander Pireno v. New York State Chiropractic Ass'n & Union Labor Life Ins. Co., 650 F.2d 387 (2d Cir. 1981). “15 U.S.C. § 1014 . 8 . Under Blue Shield’s provider contracts, participating pharmacies were required to supply prescription drugs to Blue Shield’s insureds for a fixed fee of $2.”
Women in City Gov't United v. City of New York, 515 F. Supp. 295 (S.D.N.Y. 1981). “15 U.S.C. § 1014 . Thus, at the time when the legislature set up the McCarran-Ferguson protection of state insurance regulation, it clearly distinguished between federal legislation in the fields of labor and trade regulation with respect to insurance interests.”
Attorney Gen. v. Travelers Ins., 433 N.E.2d 1223 (Mass. 1982). “1337 , 1352 (1972). 25 The defendants point out that the McCarran-Ferguson Act provides that it should not be construed to affect the “application to the business of insurance of the [NLRA].”
Alleghany Corp. v. Haase, 708 F. Supp. 1507 (W.D. Wis. 1989). “(b) No Act of Congress shall be construed to invalidate, impair, or supersede any law enacted by any State for the purpose of regulating the business of insurance, or which imposes a fee or tax upon such business unless such Act specifically relates to the business of…”
John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. v. Comm'r of Ins., 208 N.E.2d 516 (Mass. 1965). “It was nevertheless specifically provided that “ [n]othing contained in this chapter shall he construed to affect in any manner the application to the business of insurance of the Act of July 5, 1935, as amended, known as the National Labor Relations *398 Act .”
United Off. & Prof'l Workers of Am. v. Smiley, 77 F. Supp. 659 (M.D. Penn. 1948). “” On insurance and interstate commerce, see Robert L. Stern, “The Commerce Clause and the-National Economy.”
Prudential Ins. Co. of Am. v. Ins. Comm'r, 293 A.2d 529 (Me. 1972). “” 15 U.S.C. § 1014 . The United States Supreme Court, lacking precise congressional guidelines, has imposed the principle of pre-emption upon this area and has undertaken to delimit state and federal authority to avoid conflict in furthering the national labor relations policy.”
Cody v. Cmty. Loan Corp., 606 F.2d 499 (5th Cir. 1979). “Congress has displayed equivalent abilities in specifically relating federal legislation to the insurance business; witness, for example, its action with respect to the National Labor Relations Act and the Fair Labor Standards Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 1014 . When and if these…”
Monarch Life Ins. v. Loyal Prot. Life Ins., 217 F. Supp. 210 (S.D.N.Y. 1963). “[ 15 U.S.C. § 1014 ].” 1 Under Section 2(b) of the McCarran Act Congress specifically provided that the Sherman Act, the Clayton Act and the Federal Trade Commission Act shall not be applicable to the business of insurance in states where that business is regulated by state law.”
Murff v. Prof'l Med. Ins., 97 F.3d 289 (8th Cir. 1996). “We note that Congress could, of course, except the ADEA from the reach of the McCarran-Ferguson Act, just as it has the National Labor Relations Act, the Fan-Labor Standards Act, and the Merchant Marine Act.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.