15 U.S.C. § 1332
Definitions
1985—Pars. (8), (9). Pub. L. 99–92 added par. (8) and redesignated former par. (8) as (9).
1984—Par. (8). Pub. L. 98–474 added par. (8).
1973—Subsec. (7). Pub. L. 93–109 added subsec. (7).
1970—Subsec. (3). Pub. L. 91–222 inserted provisions defining “State”.
Pub. L. 93–109, § 4,
Amendment by Pub. L. 91–222 effective
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1970–2021 · leading case: Smith v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 275 S.W.3d 748 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).
Smith v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 275 S.W.3d 748 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008). “15 U.S.C. § 1332 (1)(A); § 149.011(2). It asserts that Ms.”
People ex rel. Lockyer v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 124 P.3d 408 (Cal. 2005). “The FCLAA itself does not draw a distinction between sales of cigarettes and free distributions; it requires labeling of any package in which cigarettes are offered for sale “or otherwise distributed to consumers” ( 15 U.S.C. § 1332 (4)), and it defines the term “ ‘sale or…”
United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc., 449 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2006). “” 15 U.S.C. § 1332 (4). An onsert, which is only a small informational brochure attached to the outside of the "pack box, carton, or container .”
Cruz Vargas v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 218 F. Supp. 2d 109 (D.P.R. 2002). “See 15 U.S.C. § 1332 (3). The statute provides that, “[n]o statement relating to smoking and health, other than the statement required by section 1333 of this title, shall be required on any cigarette package.”
Smoking Everywhere, Inc. v. U.S. Food & Drug Admin., 680 F. Supp. 2d 62 (D.D.C. 2010). “” 15 U.S.C. § 1332 (1). It defines "little cigar” as "any roll of tobacco wrapped in leaf tobacco or any substance containing tobacco .”
Gibbs v. Repub. Tobacco, L.P., 119 F. Supp. 2d 1288 (M.D. Fla. 2000). “(the “Labeling Act”), mandates that all packaging and advertising of cigarettes must include the Surgeon General’s Warning that, “Cigarette Smoking is Dangerous to Your Health.”
Vango Media, Inc. v. City of New York, 829 F. Supp. 572 (S.D.N.Y. 1993). “See 15 U.S.C. § 1332 (3) (defining "State” to include political subdivisions in the 1969 amendments).”
Robinson v. Am. Broad. Companies, 328 F. Supp. 421 (E.D. Ky. 1970). “15 U.S.C. § 1332 (1). . See Board of Education of Harrodsburg v.”
Sucesión de Torres Rivera v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 12 T.C.A. 1211 (2007). “) Puerto Rico quedó incluido en las leyes antes citadas, pues así expresamente se dispone en 15 U.S.C. § 1332 (3). Concluimos que, respecto al período desde el año 1969 hasta la muerte del Sr.”
Poole v. Mazda Motor of Am., Inc. (D. Maryland 2021). “Poole argues that it is possible to obtain a significant 3 Plaintiff appears to have inadvertently cited 15 U.S.C. § 1332 in his amended complaint, ¶ 9, as well as in his initial complaint, despite intending to claim federal question jurisdiction.”
Dreyer v. Johnson & Johnson (D. Neb. 2021). “This Court has jurisdiction under 15 U.S.C. § 1332 (a). Factual Background M.”
Equal Emp. Opportunity Comm'n v. Raytheon Technical Servs. Co., 309 F. Supp. 2d 1211 (D. Haw. 2004). “To illustrate its point, Defendant cites 15 U.S.C. § 1332 (3), which regulates cigarette labeling and advertising.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.