15 U.S.C. § 1336
Authority of Federal Trade Commission; unfair or deceptive acts or practices
Nothing in this chapter (other than the requirements of section 1333 of this title) shall be construed to limit, restrict, expand, or otherwise affect the authority of the Federal Trade Commission with respect to unfair or deceptive acts or practices in the advertising of cigarettes.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases, 1971–2007 · leading case: Cipollone v. Liggett Grp., Inc., 505 U.S. 504 (1992).
Cipollone v. Liggett Grp., Inc., 505 U.S. 504 (1992). “§ 1336 ), establishes minimal *542 criminal penalties (misdemeanor and fine not to exceed $10,000) for violations of the Act's provisions (§ 1338), and authorizes federal courts, upon the Government's application, to enjoin violations of the Act (§ 1339).”
Boeken v. Philip Morris Inc., 26 Cal. Rptr. 3d 638 (Cal. Ct. App. 2005). “529; 15 U.S.C. § 1336 .) The United States Supreme Court has construed the 1969 Act as preempting damage claims based upon a failure-to-wam theory that requires a showing that post-1969 advertising or promotions should have included additional or more clearly stated warnings, or…”
Good v. Altria Grp., Inc., 501 F.3d 29 (1st Cir. 2007). “” 15 U.S.C. § 1336 . But we do not agree that the FTC’s exercise of its authority in this area has preempted state-law damages actions, like this one, alleging that a cigarette manufacturer has engaged in such acts or practices through its use of the terms “light” and “lower tar…”
Capital Broad. Co. v. Mitchell, 333 F. Supp. 582 (D.D.C. 1971). “[15] See 15 U.S.C.A. § 1336 . [16] See 15 U.S.C.A.”
Good v. Altria Grp., Inc., 436 F. Supp. 2d 132 (D. Me. 2006). “DSUF at ¶¶ 5,11; POSMF ¶ 5; 15 U.S.C. § 1336 . In 1964, after the Surgeon General’s report, the FTC proposed a Trade Regulation Rule that would have prevented any cigarette label or advertisement from stating or implying without substantiation that smoking an advertised brand…”
Forster v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 437 N.W.2d 655 (Minn. 1989). “See 15 U.S.C. § 1336 (1982). In addition, all cigarette advertising on television and radio was banned after January 1, 1971.”
Mulford v. Altria Grp., Inc., 506 F. Supp. 2d 733 (D.N.M. 2007). “” 15 U.S.C. § 1336 . See also Reilly, 533 U.”
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. Engman, 527 F.2d 1115 (2d Cir. 1975). “§ 1335 , and foreclosed any action by the FTC “with respect to its pending trade regulation rule proceeding” before July 1, 1971, 15 U.S.C. § 1336 (a). The Act also required that if the FTC planned to take any action in this area after July 1, 1971, the Commission had to give…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.