15 U.S.C. § 1608
Views of other agencies
In the exercise of its functions under this subchapter, the Bureau may obtain upon requests the views of any other Federal agency which, in the judgment of the Bureau, exercises regulatory or supervisory functions with respect to any class of creditors subject to this subchapter.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1981–2005 · leading case: Linda James v. McDonald Corp., Simon Mktg., Inc., & Ante Enter. Llc, Doing Bus. as McDonald Restaurant, 417 F.3d 672 (7th Cir. 2005).
Linda James v. McDonald Corp., Simon Mktg., Inc., & Ante Enter. Llc, Doing Bus. as McDonald Restaurant, 417 F.3d 672 (7th Cir. 2005). “In Green Tree , the Court was concerned with whether the existence of a federal statutory right under the Truth In Lending Act (“TILA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1608 et seq., evinced Congress’ intent to supersede the FAA when necessary to provide access to a legal forum.”
Pitre v. First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n (In Re Pitre), 11 B.R. 777 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 1981). “Furthermore, William and Maria Pitre are not entitled to void First Federal Savings and Loan Association of Chicago’s judicial lien pursuant to section 125 of the Truth in Lending Act because the Truth in Lending Act does not apply by its own provisions to the September 8,1976…”
Aronson v. Peoples Nat. Gas Co., 180 F.3d 558 (3rd Cir. 1999). “15 U.S.C. § 1608 . Pursuant to its authority under TILA, the Board in turn promulgated Regulation Z.”
James, Linda v. McDonald's Corp (7th Cir. 2005). “In Green Tree, the Court was concerned with whether the existence of a federal statutory right under the Truth In Lending Act (“TILA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1608 et seq., evinced Congress’ intent to supersede the FAA when necessary to provide access to a legal forum.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.