15 U.S.C. § 1609
Repealed. Pub. L. 94–239, § 3(b)(1), Mar. 23, 1976, 90 Stat. 253
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2009–2024 · leading case: French v. Am. Gen. Fin. Servs. (In Re French), 401 B.R. 295 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 2009).
French v. Am. Gen. Fin. Servs. (In Re French), 401 B.R. 295 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 2009). “In renumbered paragraph 25, the Complaint incorrectly cites to 15 U.S.C. § 1609 (3)(A) as defining financial institutions; however, the correct statutory reference is 15 U.”
Creech v. Barrett Fin. Grp. LLC (D. Ariz. 2023). “The AC 26 alleges that Broker Solutions violated TILA Regulation Z by failing to timely disclose the 27 increased costs of the loan prior to closing, by doubling the origination fee in violation of 28 15 U.S.C. § 1609 (c)(1), and by failing to timely disclose that the loan…”
Lee v. Bank Of Am. (D. Mass. 2024). “In addition, the complaint asserted violations of federal laws and regulations under 15 U.S.C. § 1609 (b), 12 C.F.R. §§ 1024.36 , 1024.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.