15 U.S.C. § 713
Omitted
[omitted]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13
cases, 1942–1996 · leading case: United States v. Kansas City S. Ry. Co., 217 F.2d 763 (8th Cir. 1955).
United States v. Kansas City S. Ry. Co., 217 F.2d 763 (8th Cir. 1955). “Commodity Credit Corporation, 15 U.S.C.A. § 713 et seq., shipped, between April 20, 1945, and August 2, 1946, over Kansas City Southern Railway Co.”
United States v. Grainger, 346 U.S. 235 (1953). “15 U. S. C. §§ 713 -713a-9; 1 CFR, 1938, 659-678.”
In Re Bowling Green Milling Co., 132 F.2d 279 (6th Cir. 1942). “§ 1302 (a, b), the Commodity Credit Corporation, an agency of the United States subject to the direction of the Secretary of Agriculture (Title 15 U.S.C. § 713 and note, 15 U.S.C.A. § 713 and note), entered into certain contracts with two banks in the vicinity which were…”
United States v. Crown Equip. Corp., 86 F.3d 700 (7th Cir. 1996). “See 15 U.S.C. §§ 713 , 714. These distributions facilitate the implementation of national policies.”
United States v. De Queen & E. R.R. Co., 271 F.2d 597 (8th Cir. 1959). “Had the Government been, or become subsequently, indebted to the defendant, it could, by virtue of its right of setoff, which was recognized and reserved in § 322 of the Transportation Act of 1940, 49 U.”
Scroggin Farms Corp. v. McFadden, 165 F.2d 10 (8th Cir. 1948). “But it is made clear that the complaint of the Arkansas plaintiff in this case, together with the amendment thereto, charged against the defendant Commodity Credit Corporation, an agency of the United States, 15 U.S.C.A. § 713 , incorporated under the laws of Delaware pursuant…”
United States v. Edgerton & Sons, Inc, 178 F.2d 763 (2d Cir. 1949). “” Immunity from federal and state taxation was expressly conferred by the Act of March 8, 1938, 15 U.S.C.A. § 713a-5. Thus the implication arises that the corporation possessed no other immunity, and this is fortified by the fact that in 1948 when it was succeeded by a…”
WM. Schluderberg-T. J. Kurdle Co. v. Reconstruction Fin. Corp., 169 F.2d 419 (Emer. Ct. App. 1948). “671 , 672, § 6(a) (4), 15 U.S.C.A. § 713 note, italics added. Two further relevant provisions were added by the Price Control Extension Act of 1946, (1) that when any subsidy “is reduced or terminated, or upon recontrol is not restored or is restored only in part, any maximum…”
Hatter v. United States, 132 F.2d 279 (6th Cir. 1942). “§ 1302 (a, b), the Commodity Credit Corporation, an agency of the United States subject to the direction of the Secretary of Agriculture (Title 15 U.S.C. § 713 and note, 15 U.S.C.A. § 713 and note), entered into certain contracts with two banks in the vicinity which were…”
Swift & Co. v. Reconstruction Fin. Corp., 183 F.2d 456 (7th Cir. 1950). “1,” wherein it stated that the Office of Temporary Price Controls had determined that, in view of Section 6(a) (4) of the Price Control Extension Act of 1946, 15 U.S.C.A. § 713 note, in order to avoid unjust enrichment of packers, subsidies allocable to the volume of processed…”
Swift & Co. v. Reconstruction Fin. Corp., 79 F. Supp. 546 (N.D. Ill. 1948). “Section 6 thereof, 15 U.S.C.A. § 713 note, extending the authority of Reconstruction Finance Corporation to continue the noncrop subsidy program theretofore in effect for the period ending June 30, 1947.”
Great N. Ry. Co. v. Commodity Credit Corp., 77 F. Supp. 780 (D. Minnesota 1948). “164, 15 U.S.C.A. § 713 . Commodity was engaged, commencing in 1943, in purchasing wheat and furnishing it to deficit areas to provide additional supplies of feed for the production of livestock and poultry as a part of the Government’s so-called “Feed Wheat Program”.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.