15 U.S.C. § 715b
Interstate transportation of contraband oil forbidden
The shipment or transportation in interstate commerce from any State of contraband oil produced in such State is prohibited. For the purposes of this section contraband oil shall not be deemed to have been produced in a State if none of the petroleum constituting such contraband oil, or from which it was produced or derived, was produced, transported, or withdrawn from storage in excess of the amounts permitted to be produced, transported, or withdrawn from storage under the laws of such State or under any regulation or order prescribed thereunder by any board, commission, officer, or other duly authorized agency of such State.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1936–1973 · leading case: Stand. Oil Co. of Texas & Pasotex Pipe Line Co. v. United States, 307 F.2d 120 (5th Cir. 1962).
Stand. Oil Co. of Texas & Pasotex Pipe Line Co. v. United States, 307 F.2d 120 (5th Cir. 1962). “Oil swapped in this fashion is most certainly hot oil under *124 the Connally Act which, forbidding “the transportation in interstate commerce * * * of contraband oil * * 15 U.S.C.A. § 715b, defines this as “petroleum which, * * * was produced * * * or withdrawn * * * in excess…”
Jerome v. United States, 318 U.S. 101 (1943). “31 , 15 U. S. C. § 715b; Act of June 25, 1936, 49 Stat.”
Griswold v. the President of the United States, 82 F.2d 922 (5th Cir. 1936). “” Section 3 of that act (15 U.S.C.A. § 715b) prohibits “the shipment or transportation in interstate commerce from any State of contraband oil produced in such State.”
Appalachian Ins. v. Betts, 518 P.2d 385 (Kan. 1973). “Neither have we succeeded in locating an authentic precedent nor, for that matter, any federal statute identical to 15 U. S. C. § 715b (c). However, we find considerable analogy between the position of Appalachian, the subrogee in this case, and the standing of a subrogee in…”
United States v. Turley, 141 F. Supp. 527 (D. Maryland 1956). “United States and Ackerson v. United States, supra, the point was expressly decided.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.