15 U.S.C. § 781

Comprehensive energy plan

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 15 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) Report to President and Congress; analytical justification; scope of analysisPursuant and subject to the provisions and procedures set forth in this chapter, the Administrator shall, within six months from May 7, 1974, develop and report to the Congress and the President a comprehensive plan designed to alleviate the energy shortage, for the time period covered by this chapter. Such plan shall be accompanied by full analytical justification for the actions proposed therein. Such analysis shall include, but not be limited to—(1) estimates of the energy savings of each action and of the program as a whole;(2) estimates of any windfall losses and gains to be experienced by corporations, industries, and citizens grouped by socioeconomic class;(3) estimates of the impact on supplies and consumption of energy forms consequent to such price changes as are or may be proposed; and(4) a description of alternative actions which the Administrator has considered together with a rationale in explanation of the rejection of any such alternatives in preference to the measures actually proposed.(b) Alterations; analytical justifications

The Administrator may, from time to time, modify or otherwise alter any such plan, except that, upon request of an appropriate committee of the Congress, the Administrator shall supply analytical justifications for any such alterations.

(c) Monitoring activity

The Administrator shall be responsible for monitoring any such plans as are implemented with respect to their effectiveness in achieving the anticipated benefits.

(Pub. L. 93–275, § 22, May 7, 1974, 88 Stat. 113.)Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesTransfer of Functions

Federal Energy Administration terminated and functions vested by law in Administrator thereof transferred to Secretary of Energy (unless otherwise specifically provided) by sections 7151(a) and 7293 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 141 cases (5 in the last 5 years), 1937–2025 · leading case: Ruben Carnero v. Boston Sci. Corp., 433 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2005).
Ruben Carnero v. Boston Sci. Corp., 433 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2005). · cites it 3× “Companies subject to the Act are those “with a class of securities registered under section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ( 15 U.S.C. § 781 )” or “required to file reports under section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.”
BMW of North Am., Inc. v. Gore, 517 U.S. 559 (1996). “892 , 894, as amended, 15 U. S. C. §§781 -78m; Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act, 79 Stat.”
Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Lawbaugh, 359 F. Supp. 2d 418 (D. Maryland 2005). “§ 78u(d)(2), Defendant BE, and the same hereby IS, PERMANENTLY RESTRAINED, ENJOINED, AND PROHIBITED form acting as an officer or director of any issuer that has a class of securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. § 781 , or that is required to…”
Lawson v. Fmr Co., Inc., 670 F.3d 61 (1st Cir. 2012). · cites it 3× “— No company with a class of securities registered under section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ( 15 U.S.C. § 781 ), or that is required to file reports under section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.”
Riverwalk Casino, L.P. v. Pennsylvania Gaming Control Bd., 926 A.2d 926 (Pa. 2007). · cites it 2× “(F) Records of an applicant or licensee not required to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission by issuers that either have securities registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ( 15 U.S.C.A. § 781 ) or are required to file reports under…”
Nathenson v. Zonagen Inc., 267 F.3d 400 (5th Cir. 2001). “” 15 U.S.C. § 781 (a). 7 . The Court made it clear, however, that negligence alone is insufficient to support liability.”
In Re Initial Pub. Offering Sec. Litig., 241 F. Supp. 2d 281 (S.D.N.Y. 2003). “§ 78r (liability for misleading statements in certain periodic reports filed with the SEC); Section 20, 15 U.S.C. § 781 (liability for controlling persons); and Section 20A, 15 U.”
DeKalb Cnty. Pension Fund v. Transocean Ltd., 817 F.3d 393 (2d Cir. 2016). “1990), we concluded that the implied private rights of action in Section 14 were “analogous” to the express private rights of action in Sections 9(f) and 18(a) of the 1934 Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 781 (f), 7 78r(a), 8 in large part be *398 cause these actions share common goals, 9 We…”
Calderon-Serra v. Wilimington Trust Co., 715 F.3d 14 (1st Cir. 2013). “The Notes were not registered under the Securities Act, see 15 U.S.C. § 781 , based on an exemption from registration.”
Joan C. Howard v. Everex Sys., Inc., Steven L.W. Hui Michael C.Y. Wong Wong's Int'l (Holdings) Ltd. Gatcombe Corp. N.V., 228 F.3d 1057 (9th Cir. 2000). “15 U.S.C. § 781 (a). 4 . Additionally, plaintiff contends that the district court dismissed § 10(b) claims against Hui not related to Everex’s financial statements.”
In Re BISYS Sec. Litig., 397 F. Supp. 2d 430 (S.D.N.Y. 2005). “Fox, former chief financial officer; (5) Russell Fradin, current president and chief executive officer; (6) Kevin Dell, current executive vice president, general counsel, and secretary; and (7) Mark J.”
Nat. Resources Def. Council, Inc. v. Sec. & Exch. Comm'n, 606 F.2d 1031 (D.C. Cir. 1979). “” Similarly, § 12(b) of the 1934 Act, 15 U.S.C. § 781 (b), provides that the SEC “may by rules [and] regulations require,” in applications for the reg *1051 istration of a class of securities, such information respecting the issuer’s organization, financial structure, nature of…”
— 15 U.S.C. § 781(g) — 1 case
Reserve Life Ins. v. Provident Life Ins., 499 F.2d 715 (8th Cir. 1974).
— 15 U.S.C. § 781(g)(2)(E) — 1 case
Forman v. Cmty. Servs., Inc., 366 F. Supp. 1117 (S.D.N.Y. 1973).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.