16 U.S.C. § 1454
Submittal of State program for approval
Any coastal state which has completed the development of its management program shall submit such program to the Secretary for review and approval pursuant to section 1455 of this title.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 23
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1979–2024 · leading case: California Coastal Comm'n v. Granite Rock Co., 480 U.S. 572 (1987).
California Coastal Comm'n v. Granite Rock Co., 480 U.S. 572 (1987). “The requirements for such a program include "[a] definition of what shall constitute permissible land uses and water uses within the coastal zone," 16 U. S. C. § 1454 (b)(2), and "[a]n identification of the means by which the state proposes to exert control over [those] land…”
Norfolk S. Corp. v. Oberly, 632 F. Supp. 1225 (D. Del. 1986). “94-370, §§ 4, 5(3) (1976), amending 16 U.S.C. §§ 1454 , 1455(c)(8). The CZMA was amended again in 1980.”
Weaver's Cove Energy, LLC v. Rhode Island Coastal Resources Mgmt. Council, 589 F.3d 458 (1st Cir. 2009). “16 U.S.C. §§ 1454 , 1455(d)-(e), 1456(c)(3)(A).”
Pub. Access Shoreline Hawaii ex rel. Rothstein v. Hawai'i Cnty. Plan. Comm'n ex rel. Fujimoto, 903 P.2d 1246 (Haw. 1995). “See 16 U.S.C. § 1454 (b)(7) (1985) (requiring each state to create a planning process that provides adequate protection of such resources before federal approval is granted and funding will be made available); 16 U.”
Barcelo v. Brown, 478 F. Supp. 646 (D.P.R. 1979). “16 U.S.C. §§ 1454 , 1455, 1456, 1456a, 1456b, 1456c, 1458, 1461.”
The Matter of Entergy Nuclear Operations v. New York State Dep't of State, 66 N.E.3d 1062 (NY 2016). “Upon completion, the state then submits the CMP to the United States Secretary of Commerce for authorization (see 16 USC § 1454 ). The act mandates that once the Secretary has approved a state’s management program, “any applicant for a required [federal license .”
Defend H20 v. Town Bd. of East Hampton, 147 F. Supp. 3d 80 (E.D.N.Y 2015). “setting forth objectives, policies, and standards to guide public and private uses of lands and waters in the coastal zone.”
Am. Petroleum Inst. v. Robert W. Knecht, 609 F.2d 1306 (9th Cir. 1979). “16 U.S.C. § 1454 and § 1455. 6 . 16 U.S.C.”
State of Cal. by & Through Brown v. Watt, 520 F. Supp. 1359 (C.D. Cal. 1981). “16 U.S.C. §§ 1454 , 1455. The grants, however, are of limited duration.”
Exxon Corp. v. Michael L. Fischer, 807 F.2d 842 (9th Cir. 1987). “16 U.S.C. § 1454 (1982). But Congress recognized that activity in the OCS might affect the state’s coastal zones; it included within the CZMA a mechanism for resolving conflicts between state coastal zone plans and federally-approved OCS activities.”
California v. Watt, 683 F.2d 1253 (9th Cir. 1982). “” 16 U.S.C. § 1454 (b)(8) (emphasis added).”
Greenpeace, Inc. v. State, Off. of Mgmt. & Budget, Div. of Governmental Coordination & Alaska Coastal Policy Council, 79 P.3d 591 (Alaska 2003). “16 U.S.C. § 1454 (requiring submittal for approval); § 1458(c) (addressing suspension of funding), (d) (providing for withdrawal of approval).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.