U.S. Code » Title 16 » Chapter CHAPTER 66— TAKE PRIDE IN AMERICA PROGRAM

16 U.S.C. § 4601

Establishment of Take Pride in America Program

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 16 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) In general

There is hereby established the Take Pride in America Program within the Department of the Interior (hereinafter referred to as the “TPIA Program”).

(b) PurposesThe purposes of the TPIA Program shall include the following:(1) To establish and maintain a public awareness campaign in cooperation with public and private organizations and individuals—(A) to instill in the public the importance of the appropriate use of, and appreciation for Federal, State, and local lands, facilities, and natural and cultural resources;(B) to encourage an attitude of stewardship and responsibility toward these lands, facilities, and resources; and(C) to promote participation by individuals, organizations, and communities of a conservation ethic in caring for these lands, facilities, and resources.(2) To conduct a national awards program to honor those individuals and entities which, in the opinion of the Secretary of the Interior (hereafter in this chapter referred to as the “Secretary”), have distinguished themselves in the activities described in paragraph (1) of this subsection.(Pub. L. 101–628, title XI, § 1102, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4502.)Editorial NotesReferences in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsec. (b)(2), was in the original “this Act”, and was translated as reading “this title”, meaning title XI of Pub. L. 101–628, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4502, known as the Take Pride in America Act, which is classified generally to this chapter, to reflect the probable intent of Congress.

Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesShort Title

Pub. L. 101–628, title XI, § 1101, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4502, provided that: “This title [enacting this chapter] may be cited as the ‘Take Pride in America Act’.”

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases, 1976–2016 · leading case: Rachel Evans v. James T. Lynn v. The Town of New Castle, Appellee-Intervenor, 537 F.2d 571 (2d Cir. 1976).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Rachel Evans v. James T. Lynn v. The Town of New Castle, Appellee-Intervenor, 537 F.2d 571 (2d Cir. 1976). · cites it 2× “(d) The Secretary of Housing and Urban Development shall— (5) administer the programs and activities relating to housing and urban development in a manner affirmatively to further the policies of this subchapter. . The grant of matching funds for the sewer was made under the…”
Buono v. Norton, 364 F. Supp. 2d 1175 (C.D. Cal. 2005). “Under normal circumstances, the transfer of land over which the National Park Service (“NPS”) has jurisdiction takes place pursuant to 16 U.S.C. § 4601 — 22(b) (“Section 4601-22(b)”), which gives the Secretary of the Interior authority to exchange federal land for non-federal…”
St. John's United Church of Christ v. City of Chicago, 401 F. Supp. 2d 887 (N.D. Ill. 2005). “Included were issues of whether the FAA was in violation of RFRA; NEPA; Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act; Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act; the Due Process Clause; the Free Exercise Clause; Chapter 471 of Title 49 of the United States…”
Ocoee River Council v. Tennessee Valley Auth., 540 F. Supp. 788 (E.D. Tenn. 1982). · cites it 2× “; and the Outdoor Recreation Act, 16 U.S.C. § 4601 A hearing was held upon the plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction upon April 15, 1981.”
St. John Taxi Ass'n v. Norton, 227 F. Supp. 2d 451 (D.V.I. 2002). “16 U.S.C. § 4601 -6a(b) (emphasis added).”
Smith v. City of Westfield, 58 N.E.3d 1024 (Mass. App. Ct. 2016). “See 16 U.S.C. § 4601 -8(f)(3) (1976). Because this land received a LWCF grant, it long has been designated as “article 97 land” on the Massachusetts Statewide comprehensive outdoor recreation plan.”
City of Jersey City v. Hodel, 714 F. Supp. 126 (D.N.J. 1989). “In this action for declaratory and injunc-tive relief and to mandate and compel the Secretary of the Interior of the United States of America to enforce the requirements of United States Land and Water Conservation Fund Act, 16 U.S.C. §§ 4601 -4 et seq. (“Conservation Act”),…”
Weiss v. Kempthorne, 683 F. Supp. 2d 549 (W.D. Mich. 2010). “3 (b)(3)(i); see also 16 U.S.C. § 4601—8(f)(3) (stating that wetlands and wetland interests identified in the state’s SCORP “shall be considered to be of reasonable equivalent usefulness with the property proposed for conversion”).”
Figueroa v. United States, 64 F. Supp. 2d 1125 (D. Utah 1999). “” See 16 U.S.C.A. § 4601 -6a (West 1998) (notes on Pub.”
United States v. Grabler, 907 F. Supp. 499 (D. Mass. 1995). “Whether this omission was considered or inadvertent, § 4601 has no bearing on the land in question.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.