16 U.S.C. § 460l

Repealed. Pub. L. 113–287, § 7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3272

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 16 CasesGoogle Scholar

[repealed]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1992–2017 · leading case: Weiss v. Sec'y of the U.S. Dep't of the Interior, 459 F. App'x 497 (6th Cir. 2012).
Weiss v. Sec'y of the U.S. Dep't of the Interior, 459 F. App'x 497 (6th Cir. 2012). · cites it 2× “16 U.S.C. § 460l — 8(f)(3). This provision ensures that states do not trade high-value recreational land — which they acquired or improved with federal money — for low-value land.”
Friends of Roeding Park v. City of Fresno, 848 F. Supp. 2d 1152 (E.D. Cal. 2012). “16 U.S.C. § 460l—8(f)(3); see also 36 C.F.”
Buono v. Kempthorne, 527 F.3d 758 (9th Cir. 2008). “See 16 U.S.C. § 460l—22(b); see also § 410aaa 56 (authorizing the Secretary to “acquire all lands and interest in lands within the boundary of the [Mojave] preserve by donation, purchase, or exchange”).”
Buono v. Kempthorne, 502 F.3d 1069 (9th Cir. 2007). “See 16 U.S.C. § 460l — 22(b); see also § 410uao-56 (authorizing the Secretary to “acquire all lands and interest in lands within the boundary of the [Mojave] preserve by donation, purchase, or exchange”).”
Sportsmen's Wildlife Def. Fund v. United States Dep't of the Interior, 949 F. Supp. 1510 (D. Colo. 1996). · cites it 2× “, the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act (LWCF Act); 16 U.S.C. § 460l et seq., and the National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA); 42 U.”
Sierra Club v. Davies, 955 F.2d 1188 (8th Cir. 1992). · cites it 2× “16 U.S.C. § 460l — 8(f)(3). Appellees argue that Phase I testing constitutes just such a conversion under the Act.”
Smith v. City of Westfield (Mass. 2017). “" 16 U.S.C. § 460l (1976). Grant money distributed pursuant to the act is known as LWCF funding.”
Friends of Ironbridg v. Babbitt, Sec (4th Cir. 1999). “*See 16 U.S.C.A. § 460l -8 (West 1993 & Supp. 1999).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.