16 U.S.C. § 470bb
Definitions
The Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act, referred to in par. (5), is Pub. L. 92–203,
1988—Par. (3). Pub. L. 100–588 substituted a period for semicolon at end.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases, 1990–2020 · leading case: Meredith v. Fed. Mine Saf. & Health Review Comm'n, 177 F.3d 1042 (D.C. Cir. 1999).
Meredith v. Fed. Mine Saf. & Health Review Comm'n, 177 F.3d 1042 (D.C. Cir. 1999). “performing weather modification activities, except where acting solely as an employee, agent, or independent contractor of the Federal Government”); 16 U.S.C. § 470bb(6) (person means “an individual, corporation .”
WildEarth Guardians v. U.S. Dep't of Just., 283 F. Supp. 3d 783 (D. Ariz. 2017). “at 1140 (citing 16 U.S.C. § 470bb(1) ). The defendant argued the offense required proof of specific intent, i.”
United States v. Bradley Owen Austin, 902 F.2d 743 (9th Cir. 1990). “16 U.S.C. § 470bb(l). Any person who knowingly violates, or counsels, procures, solicits, or employs any other person to violate, any prohibition contained in subsection (a), (b), or (c) of this section shall, upon conviction, be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not…”
Bonnichsen v. United States, 217 F. Supp. 2d 1116 (D. Or. 2002). “” 16 USC § 470bb; 43 CFR § 7.3 (l)(a), (3)(vi).”
United States v. Ian Martin Lynch, 233 F.3d 1139 (9th Cir. 2000). “In order to determine whether the skull was at least 100 years old, and therefore an “archeological resource” under 16 U.S.C. § 470bb(l), authorities cut out a section of the skull and had the fragment’s age measured by carbon dating.”
Starkey v. United States Dep't of Interior, 238 F. Supp. 2d 1188 (S.D. Cal. 2002). “” Because the fee property is alienable only with the approval of the Secretary, the fee property falls within the scope of “Indian lands,” as defined in 16 U.S.C. § 470bb. Plaintiffs also argue that Defendants fail to establish that the “archaeological resources” sought to be…”
Kickapoo Traditional Tribe of Texas v. Chacon, 46 F. Supp. 2d 644 (W.D. Tex. 1999). “” 16 U.S.C. § 470bb(l) (emphasis added). To obtain a permit under ARPA, the applicant must request one from the federal *651 land manager having authority over the land.”
In Re the Exhumation of Lewis, 999 F. Supp. 1066 (M.D. Tenn. 1998). “16 U.S.C. § 470bb(l). Any person seeking to excavate any archaeological resource located on federal land must first apply with the federal land manager having authority over the land in question.”
Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation v. Mnuchin (D.D.C. 2020). “, 16 U.S.C. § 470bb(5) (defining “Indian tribe” as “any Indian tribe, band, nation, or other organized group or community, including any Alaska Native village or regional or village corporation as defined in, or established pursuant to, the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (…”
Fein v. Peltier, 949 F. Supp. 374 (D.V.I. 1996). “and (B) all other lands the fee title to which is held by the United States 16 U.S.C. § 470bb(3). Plaintiff argues that the United States does "not own and administer as part of the national park system the Subject Parcel.”
— 16 U.S.C. § 470bb(1) — 2 cases
WildEarth Guardians v. U.S. Dep't of Just., 283 F. Supp. 3d 783 (D. Ariz. 2017). “at 1140 (citing 16 U.S.C. § 470bb(1) ). The defendant argued the offense required proof of specific intent, i.”
Starkey v. United States Dep't of Interior, 238 F. Supp. 2d 1188 (S.D. Cal. 2002). “” Because the fee property is alienable only with the approval of the Secretary, the fee property falls within the scope of “Indian lands,” as defined in 16 U.S.C. § 470bb. Plaintiffs also argue that Defendants fail to establish that the “archaeological resources” sought to be…”
— 16 U.S.C. § 470bb(3) — 1 case
Fein v. Peltier, 949 F. Supp. 374 (D.V.I. 1996). “and (B) all other lands the fee title to which is held by the United States 16 U.S.C. § 470bb(3). Plaintiff argues that the United States does "not own and administer as part of the national park system the Subject Parcel.”
— 16 U.S.C. § 470bb(4) — 1 case
Starkey v. United States Dep't of Interior, 238 F. Supp. 2d 1188 (S.D. Cal. 2002). “” Because the fee property is alienable only with the approval of the Secretary, the fee property falls within the scope of “Indian lands,” as defined in 16 U.S.C. § 470bb. Plaintiffs also argue that Defendants fail to establish that the “archaeological resources” sought to be…”
— 16 U.S.C. § 470bb(5) — 1 case
Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation v. Mnuchin (D.D.C. 2020). “, 16 U.S.C. § 470bb(5) (defining “Indian tribe” as “any Indian tribe, band, nation, or other organized group or community, including any Alaska Native village or regional or village corporation as defined in, or established pursuant to, the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (…”
— 16 U.S.C. § 470bb(6) — 1 case
Meredith v. Fed. Mine Saf. & Health Review Comm'n, 177 F.3d 1042 (D.C. Cir. 1999). “performing weather modification activities, except where acting solely as an employee, agent, or independent contractor of the Federal Government”); 16 U.S.C. § 470bb(6) (person means “an individual, corporation .”
— 16 U.S.C. § 470bb(l) — 5 cases
United States v. Bradley Owen Austin, 902 F.2d 743 (9th Cir. 1990). “16 U.S.C. § 470bb(l). Any person who knowingly violates, or counsels, procures, solicits, or employs any other person to violate, any prohibition contained in subsection (a), (b), or (c) of this section shall, upon conviction, be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not…”
United States v. Ian Martin Lynch, 233 F.3d 1139 (9th Cir. 2000). “In order to determine whether the skull was at least 100 years old, and therefore an “archeological resource” under 16 U.S.C. § 470bb(l), authorities cut out a section of the skull and had the fragment’s age measured by carbon dating.”
Kickapoo Traditional Tribe of Texas v. Chacon, 46 F. Supp. 2d 644 (W.D. Tex. 1999). “” 16 U.S.C. § 470bb(l) (emphasis added). To obtain a permit under ARPA, the applicant must request one from the federal *651 land manager having authority over the land.”
Starkey v. United States Dep't of Interior, 238 F. Supp. 2d 1188 (S.D. Cal. 2002). “” Because the fee property is alienable only with the approval of the Secretary, the fee property falls within the scope of “Indian lands,” as defined in 16 U.S.C. § 470bb. Plaintiffs also argue that Defendants fail to establish that the “archaeological resources” sought to be…”
In Re the Exhumation of Lewis, 999 F. Supp. 1066 (M.D. Tenn. 1998). “16 U.S.C. § 470bb(l). Any person seeking to excavate any archaeological resource located on federal land must first apply with the federal land manager having authority over the land in question.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.