For the purpose of maintaining and operating the properties now owned by the United States in the vicinity of Muscle Shoals, Alabama, in the interest of the National defense and for agricultural and industrial development, and to improve navigation in the Tennessee River and to control the destructive flood waters in the Tennessee River and Mississippi River Basins, there is created a body corporate by the name of the “Tennessee Valley Authority” (hereinafter referred to as the “Corporation”). The Board of Directors first appointed shall be deemed the incorporators, and the incorporation shall be held to have been effected from the date of the first meeting of the Board. This chapter may be cited as the “Tennessee Valley Authority Act of 1933.”
Notes of Decisions
Jerry Duncan v. Leonard Muzyn, 833 F.3d 567 (6th Cir. 2016).
· cites it 2× “See Tennessee Valley Authority Act of 1933, 16 U.S.C. §§ 831 et seq. Several years later, the TVA established the TVARS for the purpose of managing the retirement plans of TVA employees, who become members of the retirement system upon accepting employment.”
Robert Bledsoe v. TVA Bd. of Directors, 42 F.4th 568 (6th Cir. 2022).
“at 48–49) (Page ID #551); 16 U.S.C. § 831 . TVA operates two nuclear plants in Tennessee: the Sequoyah Nuclear Plant and the Watts Bar Nuclear Plant.”
Posey v. Tennessee Valley Auth., 93 F.2d 726 (5th Cir. 1937).
· cites it 4× “The Authority by demurrers contended that the statutes of Alabama were inapplicable to it as an agency of the United States, nor was the common law, but that the TVA Act, 16 U.S.C.A. § 831 et seq., had provided as an exclusive remedy relief under the United States Employees'…”
Tennessee Valley Auth. v. Whitman, 336 F.3d 1236 (11th Cir. 2003).
“This Litigation The Tennessee Valley Authority (“TVA”), an agency of the United States, was established pursuant to the Tennessee Valley Authority Act of 1933, 16 U.S.C. §§ 831 -831ee. One of its primary responsibilities is to provide electric power at reasonable rates.”
McCarthy v. Middle Tennessee Elec. Membership Corp., 466 F.3d 399 (6th Cir. 2006).
“16 U.S.C. § 831 . While this is not an easy question, we believe that the key distinction presented by Flamingo, that the TVA is a federal corporation unlike the Postal Service, supports the conclusion that the TVA is not immune from antitrust liability on these grounds.”
William M. Young & Faith Adams Young v. Tennessee Valley Auth., 606 F.2d 143 (6th Cir. 1979).
· cites it 3× “This appeal involves the legal question whether the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) has authority under the Tennes *144 see Valley Authority Act of 1933, 16 U.S.C. § 831 et seq., to construct the Hartsville nuclear powered electric generating plant on a site located on the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.