16 U.S.C. § 831t
Offenses; fines and punishment
(a) Larceny, embezzlement and conversionAll general penal statutes relating to the larceny, embezzlement, conversion, or to the improper handling, retention, use, or disposal of public moneys or property of the United States, shall apply to the moneys and property of the Corporation and to moneys and properties of the United States intrusted to the Corporation.
(b) False entry, report or statementAny person who, with intent to defraud the Corporation, or to deceive any director, officer, or employee of the Corporation or any officer or employee of the United States (1) makes any false entry in any book of the Corporation, or (2) makes any false report or statement for the Corporation, shall, upon conviction thereof, be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.
(c) Conspiracy to defraudAny person who shall receive any compensation, rebate, or reward, or shall enter into any conspiracy, collusion, or agreement, express or implied, with intent to defraud the Corporation or wrongfully and unlawfully to defeat its purposes, shall, on conviction thereof, be fined not more than $5,000 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.
(May 18, 1933, ch. 32, § 21, 48 Stat. 68.)
Notes of Decisions
United States v. Wells, 519 U.S. 482 (1997).
· cites it 2× “§ 1825 (a)(2)(B) (penalizing false statement in report required by Horse Protection Act); 16 U. S. C. § 831t(b) (penalizing false statement to or on behalf of the Tennessee Valley Authority); 18 U.”
United States v. Michael E. Gaudin, 28 F.3d 943 (9th Cir. 1994).
“§ 1825 (a)(2)(B) (penalizing false statement in report required by Horse Protection Act); 16 U.S.C. § 831t(b) (penalizing false statement to or on behalf of the Tennessee Valley Authority); 18 U.”
United States v. Luciano Pascacio-Rodriguez, 749 F.3d 353 (5th Cir. 2014).
“§ 1693n(b)(l)-(2) (conspiracy to use or transport in interstate or foreign commerce a counterfeit, fictitious, altered, forged, lost, *361 stolen, or fraudulently obtained debit instrument); 16 U.S.C. § 831t(c) (conspiracy to defraud the Tennessee Valley Authority); 18 U.”
Hill v. Tennessee Valley Auth., 842 F. Supp. 1413 (N.D. Ala. 1993).
· cites it 2× “While plaintiff alleges in his complaint that each of the employees acted outside their scope of employment, the only basis for these allegations is the argument that the employees violated 16 U.S.C. § 831t(b) and therefore the employees’ actions must be viewed as outside the…”
United States v. Gen. Elec. Co., 209 F. Supp. 197 (E.D. Pa. 1962).
“” 16 U.S.C.A. § 831t(a). Section 26 empowers TVA to use proceeds, inter alia, from its power operations “in conducting its business in generating, transmitting, and distributing electric energy.”
In Re Uranium Indus. Antitrust Litig., 458 F. Supp. 1223 (J.P.M.L. 1978).
“In the third count of each complaint, TVA alleges that the conduct of the defendants violated certain duties owed to TVA under, inter alia, Section 21(c) of the Tennessee Valley Authority Act of 1933, as amended, 16 U.S.C. § 831t(c). 3 The Illinois action was previously…”
— 16 U.S.C. § 831t(a) — 1 case
United States v. Gen. Elec. Co., 209 F. Supp. 197 (E.D. Pa. 1962).
“” 16 U.S.C.A. § 831t(a). Section 26 empowers TVA to use proceeds, inter alia, from its power operations “in conducting its business in generating, transmitting, and distributing electric energy.”
— 16 U.S.C. § 831t(b) — 3 cases
United States v. Wells, 519 U.S. 482 (1997).
“§ 1825 (a)(2)(B) (penalizing false statement in report required by Horse Protection Act); 16 U. S. C. § 831t(b) (penalizing false statement to or on behalf of the Tennessee Valley Authority); 18 U.”
United States v. Michael E. Gaudin, 28 F.3d 943 (9th Cir. 1994).
“§ 1825 (a)(2)(B) (penalizing false statement in report required by Horse Protection Act); 16 U.S.C. § 831t(b) (penalizing false statement to or on behalf of the Tennessee Valley Authority); 18 U.”
Hill v. Tennessee Valley Auth., 842 F. Supp. 1413 (N.D. Ala. 1993).
“While plaintiff alleges in his complaint that each of the employees acted outside their scope of employment, the only basis for these allegations is the argument that the employees violated 16 U.S.C. § 831t(b) and therefore the employees’ actions must be viewed as outside the…”
— 16 U.S.C. § 831t(c) — 2 cases
United States v. Luciano Pascacio-Rodriguez, 749 F.3d 353 (5th Cir. 2014).
“§ 1693n(b)(l)-(2) (conspiracy to use or transport in interstate or foreign commerce a counterfeit, fictitious, altered, forged, lost, *361 stolen, or fraudulently obtained debit instrument); 16 U.S.C. § 831t(c) (conspiracy to defraud the Tennessee Valley Authority); 18 U.”
In Re Uranium Indus. Antitrust Litig., 458 F. Supp. 1223 (J.P.M.L. 1978).
“In the third count of each complaint, TVA alleges that the conduct of the defendants violated certain duties owed to TVA under, inter alia, Section 21(c) of the Tennessee Valley Authority Act of 1933, as amended, 16 U.S.C. § 831t(c). 3 The Illinois action was previously…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.