18 U.S.C. § 1033
Crimes by or affecting persons engaged in the business of insurance whose activities affect interstate commerce
For termination of Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands, see note set out preceding section 1681 of Title 48, Territories and Insular Possessions.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 73
cases (19 in the last 5 years), 1996–2026 · leading case: United States v. Richard Renzi, 769 F.3d 731 (9th Cir. 2014).
United States v. Richard Renzi, 769 F.3d 731 (9th Cir. 2014). “Regarding Renzi’s insurance-fraud conviction, the panel rejected Renzi’s contentions (1) that the government failed to prove that Renzi & Company, an insurance agency specializing in obtaining insurance coverage for non-profit organizations and crisis pregnancy centers, was…”
Griffin v. ARX Holding Corp., 208 So. 3d 164 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016). “18 U.S.C. § 1033 (e)(1)(A). 4 The federal statute continues: “Any individual who is engaged in the business of insurance whose activities affect interstate commerce and who willfully permits the participation described in subparagraph (A) shall be fined as provided in this title…”
State v. Hammer, 2010 ND 152 (N.D. 2010). “§ 1033 (e)(1)(A), “[a]ny individual who has been convicted of any criminal felony involving dishonesty or a breach of trust, or who has been convicted of an offense under this section, and who willfully engages in the business of insurance whose activities affect interstate…”
United States v. Peterson, 896 F. Supp. 2d 305 (S.D.N.Y. 2012). “§ 1343 , one count of engaging in the insurance business after being convicted of a felony involving dishonesty or breach of trust, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1033 (e)(1)(A), and one count of money laundering, in violation of 18 U.”
United States v. Segal, 299 F. Supp. 2d 840 (N.D. Ill. 2004). “They claim that: (1) the false-statement counts (counts ten to sixteen) fail to allege 18 U.S.C. § 1033 (a)(1) violations; and (2) the mail-fraud counts (counts one through seven) fail to allege 18 U.”
United States v. Jeffrey Cohen, 888 F.3d 667 (4th Cir. 2018). “§ 1028A (Count Twenty); making false statements to an insurance regulator, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1033 (a) (Count Twenty-Four); and obstruction of justice, in violation of 18 U.”
Donelon v. Louisiana Div. of Admin. Law, 522 F.3d 564 (5th Cir. 2008). “He argued that under 18 U.S.C. § 1033 , he is the sole authority in Louisiana who may regulate which individuals may engage in the insurance business.”
Kernan v. New York State Dep't of Fin. Servs., 712 F. App'x 61 (2d Cir. 2017). “2 Kernan’s conviction barred him from engaging in the insurance business in a particular state absent consent by the state’s insurance regulator.”
Beamer v. Netco Inc., 411 F. Supp. 2d 882 (S.D. Ohio 2005). “18 U.S.C. § 1033 (e)(1)(A). For purposes of this section, the “business of insurance” includes “the writing of insurance” or “the reinsuring of risks” which includes “all acts necessary or incidental to such writing or reinsuring and the activities of persons who act as, or are…”
United States v. Peterson, 357 F. Supp. 2d 748 (S.D.N.Y. 2005). “18 and to dismiss Count Two — -the insurance business count — on the grounds that the statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1033 (e)(1)(A), is unconstitutionally vague.”
United States v. Tracey Hartz, 296 F.3d 595 (7th Cir. 2002). “§ 1341 , and insurance fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1033 . In his plea agreement, he retained the right to appeal his sentence and now argues that the district court erred in applying an increase to his offense level under United States Sentencing Guideline § 2Fl.”
United States v. Richard William Peterson, 689 F.3d 1260 (11th Cir. 2012). “§ 1343 , and (iii) insurance fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1033 (c)(1), all of which violated 18 U.”
— 18 U.S.C. § 1033(a) — 1 case
United States v. Goff, 598 F. Supp. 2d 1237 (M.D. Ala. 2009).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.