18 U.S.C. § 119
Protection of individuals performing certain official duties
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15
cases (6 in the last 5 years), 1936–2026 · leading case: Irma Ovalles v. United States, 905 F.3d 1231 (11th Cir. 2018).
Irma Ovalles v. United States, 905 F.3d 1231 (11th Cir. 2018). “§ 119 (a), which makes it a crime to knowingly disclose to the public restricted personal information about certain persons (most often, witnesses or informants in federal criminal proceedings) when that information will be used to incite or facilitate a crime of violence…”
United States v. Alphonso Wynn, 827 F.3d 778 (8th Cir. 2016). “” 5 See also 18 U.S.C. § 119 (b)(2)(A) (criminalizing publication of private information of “an individual designated in section 1114”); 18 U.”
United States v. Bankoff, 613 F.3d 358 (3rd Cir. 2010). “See 18 U.S.C. § 119 (a), (b)(2)(A) (making it a crime in certain circumstances to "make[] restricted personal information about a covered person .”
Rory Walsh v. Robert Krantz, 386 F. App'x 334 (3rd Cir. 2010). “§ 552 ; (4) a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 119 ; (5) a Federal Wiretapping Act violation, 18 U.”
United States v. McNeil, 228 F. Supp. 3d 809 (N.D. Ohio 2017). “, counts 2, 5, 8, II, and 14), and 18 U.S.C. §§ 119 and 2 (i.e., counts 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15).”
William Kaetz v. United States (3rd Cir. 2022). “, the judge’s home address) in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 119 (a)(1) and (a)(2). In Kaetz’s plea agreement, the parties stipulated to a sentence of (1) 16 months of imprisonment, and (2) three years of supervised release, the first six months of which would be served in home…”
Kaetz v. The United States of Am. (D.N.J. 2022). “In Kaetz's plea agreement, the parties stipulated to a sentence of (1) 16 months of imprisonment, and (2) three years of supervised release, the first six months of which would be served in home detention.”
Irma Ovalles v. United States (11th Cir. 2018). “, 18 U.S.C. § 119 (a)(1) (criminalizing knowingly making public restricted personal information about certain persons performing official duties “with the intent to threaten, intimidate, or incite the commission of a crime of violence against that covered person” or a member of…”
Irma Ovalles v. United States (11th Cir. 2018). “, 18 U.S.C. § 119 (a)(1) (criminalizing knowingly making public restricted personal information about certain persons performing official duties “with the intent to threaten, intimidate, or incite the commission of a crime of violence against that covered person” or a member of…”
William Kaetz v. (3rd Cir. 2021). “After filing his mandamus petition, Kaetz pleaded guilty to one count of making restricted personal information publicly available with the intent to threaten or intimidate in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 119 (a)(1) & (2), and was sentenced to 16 months in prison.”
Kaetz v. United States of Am. (D.N.J. 2023). “By way of background, Plaintiff pled guilty to one count of publicizing restricted information (a judge’s home address) under 18 U.S.C §§ 119(a)(1) and (a)(2) in the Western District of Pennsylvania.”
United States v. William Kaetz (3rd Cir. 2024). “He ultimately pleaded guilty to one count of publicizing the judge’s home address in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 119 (a)(1) and (a)(2). The District Court sentenced him to 16 months in prison and three years of supervised release.”
— 18 U.S.C. § 119(a)(1) — 1 case
Kaetz v. United States of Am. (D.N.J. 2023). “By way of background, Plaintiff pled guilty to one count of publicizing restricted information (a judge’s home address) under 18 U.S.C §§ 119(a)(1) and (a)(2) in the Western District of Pennsylvania.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.