18 U.S.C. § 2340A
Torture
2001—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 107–56 added subsec. (c).
1994—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 103–322 inserted “punished by death or” before “imprisoned for any term of years or for life”.
Section effective on the later of
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 64
cases (14 in the last 5 years), 1995–2025 · leading case: United States v. Belfast, 611 F.3d 783 (11th Cir. 2010).
United States v. Belfast, 611 F.3d 783 (11th Cir. 2010). “Emmanuel was convicted of torture and conspiracy to commit torture, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2340A. Sentencing Guidelines Appendix A states that the following guidelines may be applied to violations of § 2340A: § 2A1.”
Saleh v. Titan Corp., 580 F.3d 1 (D.C. Cir. 2009). “While the federal government has jurisdiction to pursue criminal charges against the contractors should it deem such action appropriate, see 18 U.S.C. §§ 2340A, 2441, 3261, and although extensive investigations were pursued by the Department of Justice upon referral from the…”
Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., 133 S. Ct. 1659 (2013). “, 18 U. S. C. §2340A(b)(2) (authorizing prosecution of tor- turers if “the alleged offender is present in the United States, irrespective of the nationality of the victim or alleged offender”); §1091(e)(2)(D) (2006 ed.”
Arkan Ali v. Donald Rumsfeld, 649 F.3d 762 (D.C. Cir. 2011). “18 U.S.C. § 2340A. Congress further created a cause of action against any individual who commits torture “under actual or apparent authority, or color of law, of any foreign nation,” regardless of the victim’s nationality or the geographic location of the alleged acts.”
Vance v. Rumsfeld, 653 F.3d 591 (7th Cir. 2011). “, 18 U.S.C. § 2340A (statute criminalizing overseas torture); Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman, or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, S.”
Suhail Al Shimari v. CACI Premier Tech., Inc., 840 F.3d 147 (4th Cir. 2016). “See 18 U.S.C. §§ 2340A, 2441. Therefore, to the extent that the plaintiffs’ claims rest 22 on allegations of unlawful conduct in violation of settled international law or criminal law then applicable to the CACI employees, those claims fall outside the protection of the…”
Suhail Al Shimari v. CACI Premier Tech., Inc., 758 F.3d 516 (4th Cir. 2014). “See 18 U.S.C. § 2340A. The Supreme Court certainly was aware of these civil and criminal statutes when it articulated its “touch and concern” language in Kiobel .”
United States v. Thomas Cameron Kincade, 379 F.3d 813 (9th Cir. 2004). “§ 1091 , torture, 18 U.S.C. § 2340A, or other war crimes, 18 U.”
Agency for Int'l Dev. v. All. for Open Soc'y Int'l, Inc., 140 S. Ct. 2082 (2020). “§§ 2734 (a), 2734a(a) ; 18 U.S.C. § 2340A ; 21 U.S.C. § 904 ; 22 U.”
Niles v. Wilshire Inv. Grp., LLC, 859 F. Supp. 2d 308 (E.D.N.Y 2012). “) Torture 18 U.S.C. § 2340A; (XVIII.) Retaliating against a witness, victim, or an informant — Title 18 U.”
United States v. Servando Alvarado-Casas, 715 F.3d 945 (5th Cir. 2013). “§ 2332b(c)(1)(a); 18 U.S.C. § 2340A(a); 18 U.S.C. § 2441 (a); 21 U.”
Jane Doe v. Drummond Co., Inc., 782 F.3d 576 (11th Cir. 2015). “Finally, the court considered “the expressed intent of Congress, through enactment of the TVPA and 18 U.S.C. § 2340A, to provide aliens access to United States courts and to hold citizens of the United States accountable for acts of torture committed abroad.”
— 18 U.S.C. § 2340A(a) — 13 cases
United States v. Belfast, 611 F.3d 783 (11th Cir. 2010). “Emmanuel was convicted of torture and conspiracy to commit torture, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2340A. Sentencing Guidelines Appendix A states that the following guidelines may be applied to violations of § 2340A: § 2A1.”
United States v. Servando Alvarado-Casas, 715 F.3d 945 (5th Cir. 2013). “§ 2332b(c)(1)(a); 18 U.S.C. § 2340A(a); 18 U.S.C. § 2441 (a); 21 U.”
Davis v. Folsom Cordova Unified Sch. Dist., 674 F. App'x 715 (9th Cir. 2017).
In re the Extradition of Mujagic, 990 F. Supp. 2d 207 (N.D.N.Y. 2013).
Nickolas Felder v. Tony Howerton, 240 F. App'x 404 (11th Cir. 2007).
— 18 U.S.C. § 2340A(b) — 2 cases
United States v. Belfast, 611 F.3d 783 (11th Cir. 2010). “Emmanuel was convicted of torture and conspiracy to commit torture, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2340A. Sentencing Guidelines Appendix A states that the following guidelines may be applied to violations of § 2340A: § 2A1.”
United States v. Roy M. Belfast, Jr. (11th Cir. 2010).
— 18 U.S.C. § 2340A(b)(1) — 2 cases
United States v. Belfast, 611 F.3d 783 (11th Cir. 2010). “Emmanuel was convicted of torture and conspiracy to commit torture, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2340A. Sentencing Guidelines Appendix A states that the following guidelines may be applied to violations of § 2340A: § 2A1.”
United States v. Roy M. Belfast, Jr. (11th Cir. 2010).
— 18 U.S.C. § 2340A(b)(2) — 2 cases
Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., 133 S. Ct. 1659 (2013). “, 18 U. S. C. §2340A(b)(2) (authorizing prosecution of tor- turers if “the alleged offender is present in the United States, irrespective of the nationality of the victim or alleged offender”); §1091(e)(2)(D) (2006 ed.”
— 18 U.S.C. § 2340A(c) — 3 cases
United States v. Belfast, 611 F.3d 783 (11th Cir. 2010). “Emmanuel was convicted of torture and conspiracy to commit torture, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2340A. Sentencing Guidelines Appendix A states that the following guidelines may be applied to violations of § 2340A: § 2A1.”
United States v. Roy M. Belfast, Jr. (11th Cir. 2010).
Belfast v. Breckon (W.D. Va. 2019).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.