18 U.S.C. § 3299

Child abduction and sex offenses

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 18 CasesGoogle Scholar

Notwithstanding any other law, an indictment may be found or an information instituted at any time without limitation for any offense under section 1201 involving a minor victim, and for any felony under chapter 109A, 110 (except for section 11 So in original. Probably should be “sections”. 2257 and 2257A), or 117, or section 1591.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 18 cases (8 in the last 5 years), 2010–2025 · leading case: United States v. Coutentos, 651 F.3d 809 (8th Cir. 2011).
United States v. Coutentos, 651 F.3d 809 (8th Cir. 2011). “On July 27, 2006, Congress enacted 18 U.S.C. § 3299 , which provided that “[n]otwithstanding any other law, an indictment may be found or an information instituted at any time without limitation” “for any felony” under 18 U.”
United States v. Briggs, 592 U.S. 69 (2020). “See 18 U. S. C. §3299 (permitting prosecution at any time for felonies under §§2241–2248, 2251–2256, 2258–2260A, and 2421–2429); see also 10 U.”
United States v. Craig Ralston, 973 F.3d 896 (8th Cir. 2020). “The government submits that the limitations period is governed by 18 U.S.C. § 3299 , which provides for an unlimited period to charge a § 2421 violation as in Count 2.”
United States v. Robert Webster, 797 F.3d 531 (8th Cir. 2015). “See 18 U.S.C. § 3299 (“Notwithstanding any other law, an indictment may be found .”
State v. Norris, 157 Wash. App. 50 (Wash. Ct. App. 2010). “§ 16961 (a) (emphasis added) and “[n]otwithstanding any other law,” 18 U.S.C. § 3299 (emphasis added); whereas section 3509(m), relevant here, reads, [n]otwithstanding Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.”
State v. Norris, 236 P.3d 225 (Wash. Ct. App. 2010). “§ 16961 (a) (emphasis added) and "[n]otwithstanding any other law, " 18 U.S.C. § 3299 (emphasis added); whereas section 3509(m), relevant here, reads, "[n]otwithstanding Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.”
United States v. Wilkins (D.D.C. 2022). · cites it 3× “The Government argues, however, that a more specific statute applies—18 U.S.C. § 3299, which states: Notwithstanding any other law, an indictment may be found or an information instituted at any time without limitation for any offense under section 1201 involving a minor victim,…”
United States v. Chappell, 292 F. Supp. 3d 916 (D. Me. 2017). · cites it 2× “See 18 U.S.C. § 3299 (2012) ; United States v.”
Carter v. United States (D.S.D. 2024). · cites it 2× “§§ 2252A(5)(B) and 2252A(b)(2), 18 U.S.C. § 3299 is applicable. This section provides “[n]otwithstanding any other law, an indictment may be found or an information instituted at any time without limitation for any .”
United States v. Michael Wilkins (D.C. Cir. 2024). · cites it 2× “Further, the court rejected Wilkins’ statute-of-limitations defense, holding that 18 U.S.C. § 3299 applied—a provision which permits prosecution “at any time” for § 1591 offenses.”
United States v. Barnes (2d Cir. 2021). “However, 18 U.S.C. § 3299 provides that no statute of limitations applies to any felony offense under chapter 117 of Title 18.”
United States v. Shalom (D.D.C. 2022). “§§ 2252 (a)(2) and 2260(b), neither of which statutes are subject to a statute of limitations, see 18 U.S.C. § 3299 , to argue that no reliance can be placed on the tolling of the statute of 14 limitations with the charging document, which is a factor courts have cited for…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.