18 U.S.C. § 3671
Vessels carrying explosives and steerage passengers
The amount of any fine imposed upon the master of a steamship or other vessel under the provisions of section 2278 of this title shall be a lien upon such vessel, and such vessel may be libeled therefor in the district court of the United States for any district in which such vessel shall arrive or from which it shall depart.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1981–1991 · leading case: United States v. Clayton Fountain, Thomas E. Silverstein, and Randy K. Gometz
United States v. Clayton Fountain, Thomas E. Silverstein, and Randy K. Gometz (1985)
“1976 , 2175-76 (enacting 18 U.S.C. § 3671 ). * Therefore, although I would affirm Gometz’ conviction, I would vacate his restitution sentence and remand for resentencing in light of the statutory mandate to make a meaningful inquiry into his financial resources.”
United States v. MacDonald (1985)
“MacDonald, having been denied, the government has filed a motion pursuant to Section 1406 of the Victims of Crime Act of 1984, 18 U.S.C. § 3671 , seeking forfeiture by MacDonald of all proceeds re *1184 ceived by him from publication of the book Fatal Vision and the airing of a…”
United States v. Nichols (1988)
“18 U.S.C. § 3671 (a). The statute explicitly exempts up to twenty percent of the profits from forfeiture to allow the defendant to pay for legal representation “in matters arising from the offense.”
United States v. Sharon Sue Cook (1991)
“The reference to 18 U.S.C. § 3671 appears to be an error. That section is entitled ‘‘[v]essels carrying explosives.”
United States v. Daryls Foster Steed (1981)
“29(b), we take this as the indicated rule, and accordingly hold that because no retrial would be required as a result of allowing this appeal, we have jurisdiction to entertain it under 18 U.S.C. § 3671 . 4 *139 III We turn then to review of the district court’s post-verdict…”
United States v. Waxman (1986)
“18 U.S.C. § 3671 . [Effective date 30 days after Oct.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.