U.S. Code » Title 18 » Part PART II— CRIMINAL PROCEDURE › Chapter CHAPTER 232A— SPECIAL FORFEITURE OF COLLATERAL PROFITS OF CRIME

18 U.S.C. § 3682

Notice to victims of order of special forfeiture

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 18 CasesGoogle Scholar
The United States attorney shall, within thirty days after the imposition of an order under this chapter and at such other times as the Attorney General may require, publish in a newspaper of general circulation in the district in which the offense for which a defendant was convicted occurred, a notice that states—(1) the name of, and other identifying information about, the defendant;(2) the offense for which the defendant was convicted; and(3) that the court has ordered a special forfeiture of certain proceeds that may be used to satisfy a judgment obtained against the defendant by a victim of an offense for which the defendant has been convicted.(Added Pub. L. 98–473, title II, § 1406(a), Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2176, § 3672; renumbered § 3682, Pub. L. 99–646, § 41(a), Nov. 10, 1986, 100 Stat. 3600.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 28 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1999–2025 · leading case: United States v. Tsosie, 376 F.3d 1210 (10th Cir. 2004).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
United States v. Tsosie, 376 F.3d 1210 (10th Cir. 2004). “” 18 U.S.C. § 3682 (a). On the other hand, as the Supreme Court has noted, “Congress intended supervised release to assist individuals in their transition to community life.”
United States v. Vedo McClain, 691 F.3d 774 (6th Cir. 2012). “3d at 267 (quoting 18 U.S.C. § 3682 (c)(2)). Under U.S.S.G. § 1B1.”
Lizarraga-Lopez v. United States, 89 F. Supp. 2d 1166 (S.D. Cal. 2000). “Character of Motion Lizarraga-Lopez characterizes the instant filing as- a “motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3682 (c)(2) and Sentencing Guideline § 1B1.”
United States v. Meridyth, 701 F. App'x 722 (10th Cir. 2017). “In 2014, after the Sentencing Commission amended the Guidelines to reduce the relevant offense levels, Meridyth sought a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3682 (c)(2). Although the amendments lowered Meridyth’s guidelines range to 235 — 293 months, the district court…”
United States v. Wilson, 651 F. App'x 489 (6th Cir. 2016). “The court noted that “a shorter term of imprisonment would not likely deter Wilson from returning to criminal activity in the future.”
United States v. Kevin Thompson, 619 F. App'x 514 (6th Cir. 2015). “However, that policy statement and the cases cited by Thompson involve sentence reductions under 18 U.S.C. § 3682 (c)(2) as a result of an amended guidelines range, not original sentences.”
United States v. Renard Brown, 667 F. App'x 354 (3rd Cir. 2016). “Federal prisoner Renard Brown appeals pro se from the District Court’s January 6, 2016 order denying his motion to reduce his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3682 (c)(2). For the reasons that follow, we will summarily affirm that order.”
United States v. Edison Shino, 656 F. App'x 340 (9th Cir. 2016). “MEMORANDUM ** Edison Shino appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3682 (c)(2). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.”
United States v. Anthony White, 668 F. App'x 403 (3rd Cir. 2016). “OPINION * PER CURIAM Pro se appellant Anthony White appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania denying his motion filed under 18 U.S.C. § 3682 (c)(2). We will affirm. Following a 2007 non-jury trial in the Middle District of…”
United States v. Julio Jacobo, 669 F. App'x 230 (5th Cir. 2016). “He appeals the district court’s denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3682 (c)(2) motion for a reduction of his sentence based on Amendment 782 to the United States Sentencing Guidelines, which lowered the base offense levels in the drug quantity table set forth in U.”
United States v. Lyle Johns, 669 F. App'x 424 (9th Cir. 2016). “MEMORANDUM ** Lyle Gerald Johns appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3682 (c)(2). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.”
United States v. Luis Velez, 676 F. App'x 362 (5th Cir. 2017). “PER CURIAM: * Luis Angel Velez appeals'the denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3682 (c)(2) motion, which sought a reduction of his 135-month sentence for possessing with the intent to distribute more than 50 kilograms of marijuana.”
Show all 28 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.