18 U.S.C. § 483

Uttering counterfeit foreign bank notes

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 18 CasesGoogle Scholar

Whoever, within the United States, utters, passes, puts off, or tenders in payment, with intent to defraud, any such false, forged, altered, or counterfeited bank note or bill, mentioned in section 482 of this title, knowing the same to be so false, forged, altered, and counterfeited, whether or not the same was made, forged, altered, or counterfeited within the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1938–1985 · leading case: Peninsular & Occidental S. S. Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
Peninsular & Occidental S. S. Co. v. National Labor Relations Board (1938) ca5 · cites it 2× “Implicit obedience to the lawful orders of the master is required on a vessel.”
Southern S. S. Co. v. National Labor Relations Board (1941) ca3 · cites it 2× “292 of the Criminal Code, 18 U.S.C.A. § 483 . The defendants there contended that "the crew of a vessel which is moored to a dock or is at anchor in a safe harbor have the right to strike" but the court said that that question was not before it for decision because the "Algic…”
Rees v. United States (1938) ca4 “” The defendants contend that the crew of a vessel which is moored to a dock or is at anchor in a safe harbor have the right to strike and that the Mutiny Act 18 U.S. C.A. § 483, has no application to seamen in such a situation.”
United States v. Albers (1940) ca2 “They were convicted under an indictment charging in count one, that between February 26 and April 2, 1940, at the harbor of Colombo, Island of Ceylon, at Kolachel Anchorage, Tranvancore, India, and at various other places on the high seas, they endeavored to make a revolt and…”
East River Steamship Corp. v. Delaval Turbine, Inc. (1985) ca3 “The Court held that for purposes of determining whether the strike was mutiny within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. §§ 483 , 484, a port could be deemed a maritime locale.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.