19 U.S.C. § 1335
Rules and regulations
The commission is authorized to adopt such reasonable procedures and rules and regulations as it deems necessary to carry out its functions and duties.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16
cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1935–2026 · leading case: Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281 (1979).
Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281 (1979). “[25] The Tariff Commission statute, last codified as 19 U. S. C. § 1335 (1940 ed.), provided: "It shall be unlawful for any member of the commission, or for any employee, agent, or clerk of the commission, or any other officer or employee of the United States, to divulge, or to…”
Cathedral Candle Co. v. United States Int'l Trade Comm'n, 400 F.3d 1352 (Fed. Cir. 2005). “The Commission promulgated that regulation following formal notice and comment procedures and pursuant to con *1363 gressional authorization to adopt rules and regulations necessary to carry out its functions and duties, 19 U.”
Cna Fin. Corp. v. Raymond J. Donovan, Sec'y of Labor, 830 F.2d 1132 (D.C. Cir. 1987). “19 U.S.C. § 1335 (1940). 81 . In full text it stated: Any statistical information furnished in confidence to the Bureau of Foreign and Domestic Commerce by individuals, corporations, and firms shall be confidential and shall be used only for the statistical purposes for which it…”
Vastfame Camera, Ltd., & Argus Indus., Inc. v. Int'l Trade Comm'n, & Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd., Intervenor, 386 F.3d 1108 (Fed. Cir. 2004). “The Commission cites 19 U.S.C. § 1335 , which gives the Commission authority to “adopt such reasonable procedures and rules and regulations as it deems necessary to carry out its functions and duties.”
David L. Moss Co. v. United States, 103 F.2d 395 (C.C.P.A. 1939). “Hearings provided for in that section form a part only of an investigation, as the statute does not provide, either expressly or by necessary implication, that all of the evidence presented for the consideration of the Commission and the President shall be submitted at the…”
New England Butt Co. v. Int'l Trade Comm'n, & Kokubun, Inc., Intervenors, 756 F.2d 874 (Fed. Cir. 1985). “The initial determination thus became the determination of the Commission pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1335 (1982) and 19 C.F.R. § 210.”
Avesta AB v. United States, 689 F. Supp. 1173 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1988). “See also 19 U.S.C. § 1335 (“The Commission is authorized to adopt such reasonable procedures and rules and regulations as it deems necessary to carry out its functions and duties.”
Chrysler Corp. v. Schlesinger, 565 F.2d 1172 (3rd Cir. 1977). “§ 216 (1940), a Tariff Commission statute, 19 U.S.C. § 1335 (1940), and a Commerce Department statute, 15 U.”
Stresau v. Ipsen, 77 F.2d 937 (C.C.P.A. 1935). “Vide 15 US CA § 46; 18 USCA § 216; section 335, Tariff Act of 1930 (19 USCA § 1335). We have not heretofore had before us any case in which the issue involved was on all fours with the case at bar, nor do we find any such case among the decisions of our predecessor in patent…”
Westchester Gen. Hosp., Inc. v. Dep't of Health, Educ. & Welfare, 464 F. Supp. 236 (M.D. Fla. 1979). “§ 216 (1940), 19 U.S.C. § 1335 (1940) and 15 U.S.C. § 176b (1940), were consolidated into the lengthy nondisclosure provisions of 18 U.”
Westchester Gen. Hosp. v. DEPT. OF HEALTH, ETC., 464 F. Supp. 236 (M.D. Fla. 1979). “§ 216 (1940), 19 U.S.C. § 1335 (1940) and 15 U.S.C. § 176b (1940), were consolidated into the lengthy non-disclosure provisions of 18 U.”
J. Sidak v. United States Int'l Trade Comm'n (D.C. Cir. 2026). “See 19 U.S.C. § 1335 ; 19 C.F.R. §§ 210.3 , 210.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.