19 U.S.C. § 1671b

Preliminary determinations

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 19 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) Determination by Commission of reasonable indication of injury(1) General ruleExcept in the case of a petition dismissed by the administering authority under section 1671a(c)(3) of this title, the Commission, within the time specified in paragraph (2), shall determine, based on the information available to it at the time of the determination, whether there is a reasonable indication that—(A) an industry in the United States—(i) is materially injured, or(ii) is threatened with material injury, or(B) the establishment of an industry in the United States is materially retarded,by reason of imports of the subject merchandise and that imports of the subject merchandise are not negligible. If the Commission finds that imports of the subject merchandise are negligible or otherwise makes a negative determination under this paragraph, the investigation shall be terminated.(2) Time for Commission determinationThe Commission shall make the determination described in paragraph (1)—(A) in the case of a petition filed under section 1671a(b) of this title(i) within 45 days after the date on which the petition is filed, or(ii) if the time has been extended pursuant to section 1671a(c)(1)(B) of this title, within 25 days after the date on which the Commission receives notice from the administering authority of initiation of the investigation, and(B) in the case of an investigation initiated under section 1671a(a) of this title, within 45 days after the date on which the Commission receives notice from the administering authority that an investigation has been initiated under such section.(b) Preliminary determination by administering authority; expedited determinations; waiver of verification(1) Within 65 days after the date on which the administering authority initiates an investigation under section 1671a(c) of this title, or an investigation is initiated under section 1671a(a) of this title, but not before an affirmative determination by the Commission under subsection (a) of this section, the administering authority shall make a determination, based upon the information available to it at the time of the determination, of whether there is a reasonable basis to believe or suspect that a countervailable subsidy is being provided with respect to the subject merchandise.(2) Notwithstanding paragraph (1), when the petition is one subject to section 1671a(b)(3) of this title, the Administering Authority shall, taking into account the nature of the countervailable subsidy concerned, make the determination required by paragraph (1) on an expedited basis and within 65 days after the date on which the administering authority initiates an investigation under section 1671a(c) of this title unless the provisions of subsection (c) of this section apply.(3) Within 55 days after the initiation of an investigation the administering authority shall cause an official designated for such purpose to review the information concerning the case received during the first 50 days of the investigation, and, if there appears to be sufficient information available upon which the determination can reasonably be based, to disclose to the petitioner and any interested party, then a party to the proceedings that requests such disclosure, all available nonconfidential information and all other information which is disclosed pursuant to section 1677f of this title. Within 3 days (not counting Saturdays, Sundays, or legal public holidays) after such disclosure, the petitioner and each party which is an interested party described in subparagraph (C), (D), (E), (F), or (G) of section 1677(9) of this title to whom such disclosure was made may furnish to the administering authority an irrevocable written waiver of verification of the information received by the authority, and an agreement that it is willing to have a determination made on the basis of the record then available to the authority. If a timely waiver and agreement have been received from the petitioner and each party which is an interested party described in subparagraph (C), (D), (E), (F), or (G) of section 1677(9) of this title to whom the disclosure was made, and the authority finds that sufficient information is then available upon which the preliminary determination can reasonably be based, a preliminary determination shall be made on an expedited basis on the basis of the record established during the first 50 days after the investigation was initiated.(4)De minimis countervailable subsidy.—(A)General rule.—In making a determination under this subsection, the administering authority shall disregard any de minimis countervailable subsidy. For purposes of the preceding sentence, a countervailable subsidy is de minimis if the administering authority determines that the aggregate of the net countervailable subsidies is less than 1 percent ad valorem or the equivalent specific rate for the subject merchandise.(B)Exception for developing countries.—In the case of subject merchandise imported from a Subsidies Agreement country (other than a country to which subparagraph (C) applies) designated by the Trade Representative as a developing country in accordance with section 1677(36) of this title, a countervailable subsidy is de minimis if the administering authority determines that the aggregate of the net countervailable subsidies does not exceed 2 percent ad valorem or the equivalent specific rate for the subject merchandise.(C)Certain other developing countries.—In the case of subject merchandise imported from a Subsidies Agreement country that is—(i) a least developed country, as determined by the Trade Representative in accordance with section 1677(36) of this title, or(ii) a developing country with respect to which the Trade Representative has notified the administering authority that the country has eliminated its export subsidies on an expedited basis within the meaning of Article 27.11 of the Subsidies Agreement,subparagraph (B) shall be applied by substituting “3 percent” for “2 percent”.(D)Limitations on application of subparagraph (C).—(i)In general.—In the case of a country described in subparagraph (C)(i), the provisions of subparagraph (C) shall not apply after the date that is 8 years after the date the WTO Agreement enters into force.(ii)Special rule for subparagraph (C)(ii) countries.—In the case of a country described in subparagraph (C)(ii), the provisions of subparagraph (C) shall not apply after the earlier of—(I) the date that is 8 years after the date the WTO Agreement enters into force, or(II) the date on which the Trade Representative notifies the administering authority that such country is providing an export subsidy.(5)Notification of article 8 violation.—If the only subsidy under investigation is a subsidy with respect to which the administering authority received notice from the Trade Representative of a violation of Article 8 of the Subsidies Agreement, paragraph (1) shall be applied by substituting “60 days” for “65 days”.(c) Extension of period in extraordinarily complicated cases(1) In generalIf—(A) the petitioner makes a timely request for an extension of the period within which the determination must be made under subsection (b), or(B) the administering authority concludes that the parties concerned are cooperating and determines that—(i) the case is extraordinarily complicated by reason of—(I) the number and complexity of the alleged countervailable subsidy practices;(II) the novelty of the issues presented;(III) the need to determine the extent to which particular countervailable subsidies are used by individual manufacturers, producers, and exporters; or(IV) the number of firms whose activities must be investigated; and(ii) additional time is necessary to make the preliminary determination,then the administering authority may postpone making the preliminary determination under subsection (b) until not later than the 130th day after the date on which the administering authority initiates an investigation under section 1671a(c) of this title, or an investigation is initiated under section 1671a(a) of this title.(2) Notice of postponement

The administering authority shall notify the parties to the investigation, not later than 20 days before the date on which the preliminary determination would otherwise be required under subsection (b), if it intends to postpone making the preliminary determination under paragraph (1). The notification shall include an explanation of the reasons for the postponement. Notice of the postponement shall be published in the Federal Register.

(d) Effect of determination by the administering authorityIf the preliminary determination of the administering authority under subsection (b) is affirmative, the administering authority—(1)(A) shall—(i) determine an estimated individual countervailable subsidy rate for each exporter and producer individually investigated, and, in accordance with section 1671d(c)(5) of this title, an estimated all-others rate for all exporters and producers not individually investigated and for new exporters and producers within the meaning of section 1675(a)(2)(B) of this title, or(ii) if section 1677f–1(e)(2)(B) of this title applies, determine a single estimated country-wide subsidy rate, applicable to all exporters and producers, and(B) shall order the posting of a cash deposit, bond, or other security, as the administering authority deems appropriate, for each entry of the subject merchandise in an amount based on the estimated individual countervailable subsidy rate, the estimated all-others rate, or the estimated country-wide subsidy rate, whichever is applicable,(2) shall order the suspension of liquidation of all entries of merchandise subject to the determination which are entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the later of—(A) the date on which notice of the determination is published in the Federal Register, or(B) the date that is 60 days after the date on which notice of the determination to initiate the investigation is published in the Federal Register, and(3) shall make available to the Commission all information upon which its determination was based and which the Commission considers relevant to its injury determination, under such procedures as the administering authority and the Commission may establish to prevent disclosure, other than with the consent of the party providing it or under protective order, of any information to which confidential treatment has been given by the administering authority.The instructions of the administering authority under paragraphs (1) and (2) may not remain in effect for more than 4 months.(e) Critical circumstances determinations(1) In generalIf a petitioner alleges critical circumstances in its original petition, or by amendment at any time more than 20 days before the date of a final determination by the administering authority, then the administering authority shall promptly (at any time after the initiation of the investigation under this part) determine, on the basis of the information available to it at that time, whether there is a reasonable basis to believe or suspect that—(A) the alleged countervailable subsidy is inconsistent with the Subsidies Agreement, and(B) there have been massive imports of the subject merchandise over a relatively short period.(2) Suspension of liquidationIf the determination of the administering authority under paragraph (1) is affirmative, then any suspension of liquidation ordered under subsection (d)(2) shall apply, or, if notice of such suspension of liquidation is already published, be amended to apply, to unliquidated entries of merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the later of—(A) the date which is 90 days before the date on which the suspension of liquidation was first ordered, or(B) the date on which notice of the determination to initiate the investigation is published in the Federal Register.(f) Notice of determination

Whenever the Commission or the administering authority makes a determination under this section, the Commission or the administering authority, as the case may be, shall notify the petitioner, and other parties to the investigation, and the Commission or the administering authority (whichever is appropriate) of its determination. The administering authority shall include with such notification the facts and conclusions on which its determination is based. Not later than 5 days after the date on which the determination is required to be made under subsection (a)(2), the Commission shall transmit to the administering authority the facts and conclusions on which its determination is based.

(g) Time period where upstream subsidization is involved(1) In general

Whenever the administering authority concludes prior to a preliminary determination under subsection (b), that there is a reasonable basis to believe or suspect that an upstream subsidy is being bestowed, the time period within which a preliminary determination must be made shall be extended to 250 days after the filing of a petition under section 1671a(b) of this title or initiation of an investigation under section 1671a(a) of this title (310 days in cases declared extraordinarily complicated under subsection (c)), if the administering authority concludes that such additional time is necessary to make the required determination concerning upstream subsidization.

(2) ExceptionsWhenever the administering authority concludes, after a preliminary determination under subsection (b), that there is a reasonable basis to believe or suspect that an upstream subsidy is being bestowed—(A) in cases in which the preliminary determination was negative, the time period within which a final determination must be made shall be extended to 165 or 225 days, as appropriate, under section 1671d(a)(1) of this title; or(B) in cases in which the preliminary determination is affirmative, the determination concerning upstream subsidization—(i) need not be made until the conclusion of the first annual review under section 1675 of this title of any eventual Countervailing Duty Order, or, at the option of the petitioner, or(ii) will be made in the investigation and the time period within which a final determination must be made shall be extended to 165 or 225 days, as appropriate, under section 1671d(a)(1) of this title, as appropriate,11 So in original. The words “as appropriate,” probably should not appear. except that the suspension of liquidation ordered in the preliminary determination shall terminate at the end of 120 days from the date of publication of that determination and not be resumed unless and until the publication of a Countervailing Duty Order under section 1671e(a) of this title.There may be an extension of time for the making of a final determination under this subsection only if the administering authority determines that such additional time is necessary to make the required determination concerning upstream subsidization.
(June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title VII, § 703, as added Pub. L. 96–39, title I, § 101, July 26, 1979, 93 Stat. 152; amended Pub. L. 98–181, title I [title VI, § 650(b)], Nov. 30, 1983, 97 Stat. 1266; Pub. L. 98–573, title VI, §§ 603, 613(c), Oct. 30, 1984, 98 Stat. 3024, 3036; Pub. L. 99–514, title XVIII, § 1886(a)(3), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2921; Pub. L. 100–418, title I, §§ 1324(a)(2), 1326(d)(1), Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1200, 1204; Pub. L. 103–465, title II, §§ 212(b)(1)(A), (C), (D), (F), 214(a)(1), 215(a), 233(a)(5)(C), (6)(A)(iii), (iv), (B), 263(a), 264(a), (c)(1), (2), 270(a)(1)(B)–(D), (b)(1)(B), 283(a), Dec. 8, 1994, 108 Stat. 4847, 4848, 4850, 4852, 4899, 4901, 4911, 4912, 4914, 4917, 4930; Pub. L. 104–295, § 20(b)(5), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3527.)Editorial NotesAmendments

1996—Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 104–295 amended Pub. L. 103–465, § 212(b)(1)(C)(i)(I). See 1994 Amendment note below.

1994—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 103–465, § 212(b)(1)(A), amended heading and text of subsec. (a) generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: “Except in the case of a petition dismissed by the administering authority under section 1671a(c)(3) of this title, the Commission, within 45 days after the date on which a petition is filed under section 1671a(b) of this title or on which it receives notice from the administering authority of an investigation commenced under section 1671a(a) of this title, shall make a determination, based upon the best information available to it at the time of the determination, of whether there is a reasonable indication that—

“(1) an industry in the United States—

“(A) is materially injured, or

“(B) is threatened with material injury, or

“(2) the establishment of an industry in the United States is materially retarded,

by reason of imports of the merchandise which is the subject of the investigation by the administering authority. If that determination is negative, the investigation shall be terminated.”

Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 103–465, § 270(a)(1)(B), substituted “countervailable subsidy” for “subsidy”.

Pub. L. 103–465, § 233(a)(5)(B), (6)(A)(iii), substituted “initiated” for “commenced” and “subject merchandise” for “merchandise which is the subject of the investigation”.

Pub. L. 103–465, § 212(b)(1)(C)(i)(II), (III), substituted “based upon the information” for “based upon the best information” and struck out at end “If the determination of the administering authority under this subsection is affirmative, the determination shall include an estimate of the net subsidy.”

Pub. L. 103–465, § 212(b)(1)(C)(i)(I), as amended by Pub. L. 104–295, substituted “65 days after the date on which the administering authority initiates an investigation under section 1671a(c) of this title” for “85 days after the date on which a petition is filed under section 1671a(b) of this title”.

Subsec. (b)(2). Pub. L. 103–465, § 270(a)(1)(C), substituted “countervailable subsidy” for “subsidy”.

Pub. L. 103–465, § 264(c)(1), substituted “paragraph (1)” for “subsection (b)(1) of this section” in two places and made technical amendments to references to section 1671a(b)(3) of this title and subsection (c) of this section to correct references to corresponding provisions of original act.

Pub. L. 103–465, § 212(b)(1)(C)(ii), substituted “65 days after the date on which the administering authority initiates an investigation under section 1671a(c) of this title” for “85 days after the date on which the petition is filed under section 1671a(b) of this title”.

Subsec. (b)(4). Pub. L. 103–465, § 263(a), added par. (4).

Subsec. (b)(5). Pub. L. 103–465, § 283(a), added par. (5).

Subsec. (c)(1). Pub. L. 103–465, §§ 212(b)(1)(D), 233(a)(6)(A)(iv), in concluding provisions, substituted “130th day after the date on which the administering authority initiates an investigation under section 1671a(c) of this title” for “150th day after the date on which a petition is filed under section 1671a(b) of this title” and “initiated” for “commenced”.

Subsec. (c)(1)(B)(i). Pub. L. 103–465, § 270(a)(1)(D), (b)(1)(B), substituted “countervailable subsidy” for “subsidy” in subcl. (I) and “countervailable subsidies” for “subsidies” in subcl. (III).

Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 103–465, § 215(a)(1)(B), inserted concluding provisions.

Subsec. (d)(1). Pub. L. 103–465, § 264(a)(4), added par. (1). Former par. (1) redesignated (2).

Pub. L. 103–465, § 215(a)(1)(A), substituted “warehouse, for consumption on or after the later of—” and subpars. (A) and (B), for “warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication of the notice of the determination in the Federal Register,”.

Subsec. (d)(2). Pub. L. 103–465, § 264(a)(1)–(3), redesignated par. (1) as (2), inserted “and” at end, and struck out former par. (2) which read as follows: “shall order the posting of a cash deposit, bond, or other security, as it deems appropriate, for each entry of the merchandise concerned equal to the estimated amount of the net subsidy, and”.

Subsec. (e)(1). Pub. L. 103–465, § 214(a)(1), in introductory provisions, struck out “best” before “information” and amended subpars. (A) and (B) generally. Prior to amendment, subpars. (A) and (B) read as follows:

“(A) the alleged subsidy is inconsistent with the Agreement, and

“(B) there have been massive imports of the class or kind of merchandise which is the subject of the investigation over a relatively short period.”

Subsec. (e)(2). Pub. L. 103–465, §§ 215(a)(2), 264(c)(2), substituted “subsection (d)(2)” for “subsection (d)(1)” and “warehouse, for consumption on or after the later of—” and subpars. (A) and (B) for “warehouse, for consumption on or after the date which is 90 days before the date on which suspension of liquidation was first ordered.”

Subsec. (f). Pub. L. 103–465, § 212(b)(1)(F), amended heading and text of subsec. (f) generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: “Whenever the Commission or the administering authority makes a determination under this section, it shall notify the petitioner, other parties to the investigation, and the other agency of its determination and of the facts and conclusions of law upon which the determination is based, and it shall publish notice of its determination in the Federal Register.”

Subsec. (g)(1). Pub. L. 103–465, § 233(a)(6)(B), substituted “initiation” for “commencement”.

1988—Subsec. (b)(3). Pub. L. 100–418, § 1326(d)(1), substituted “(F), or (G)” for “or (F)” in two places.

Subsec. (e)(1). Pub. L. 100–418, § 1324(a)(2), inserted “(at any time after the initiation of the investigation under this part)” after “promptly” in introductory provisions.

1986—Subsecs. (g), (h). Pub. L. 99–514 redesignated subsec. (h) as (g) and substituted “or 225 days, as appropriate, under section 1671d(a)(1) of this title” for “days under section 1671d(a)(1) of this title or 225 days under section 1671d(a)(2) of this title, as appropriate” in par. (2)(A), and “or 225 days, as appropriate, under section 1671d(a)(1) of this title” for “days under section 1671d(a)(2) of this title” in par. (2)(B)(ii).

1984—Subsec. (b)(3). Pub. L. 98–573, § 603, added par. (3).

Subsec. (h). Pub. L. 98–573, § 613(c), added subsec. (h).

1983—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 98–181 designated existing provisions as par. (1) and added par. (2).

Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective Date of 1994 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 103–465 effective, except as otherwise provided, on the date on which the WTO Agreement enters into force with respect to the United States (Jan. 1, 1995), and applicable with respect to investigations, reviews, and inquiries initiated and petitions filed under specified provisions of this chapter after such date, see section 291 of Pub. L. 103–465, set out as a note under section 1671 of this title.

Effective Date of 1988 Amendment

Amendment by section 1324(a)(2) of Pub. L. 100–418 applicable with respect to investigations initiated after Aug. 23, 1988, and amendment by section 1326(d)(1) of Pub. L. 100–418 applicable with respect to investigations initiated after Aug. 23, 1988, and to reviews initiated under section 1673e(c) or 1675 of this title after Aug. 23, 1988, see section 1337(b), (c) of Pub. L. 100–418, set out as a note under section 1671 of this title.

Effective Date of 1984 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 98–573 effective Oct. 30, 1984, see section 626(a) of Pub. L. 98–573, set out as a note under section 1671 of this title.

Plan Amendments Not Required Until January 1, 1989

For provisions directing that if any amendments made by subtitle A or subtitle C of title XI [§§ 1101–1147 and 1171–1177] or title XVIII [§§ 1801–1899A] of Pub. L. 99–514 require an amendment to any plan, such plan amendment shall not be required to be made before the first plan year beginning on or after Jan. 1, 1989, see section 1140 of Pub. L. 99–514, as amended, set out as a note under section 401 of Title 26, Internal Revenue Code.

Executive DocumentsUruguay Round Agreements: Entry Into Force

The Uruguay Round Agreements, including the World Trade Organization Agreement and agreements annexed to that Agreement, as referred to in section 3511(d) of this title, entered into force with respect to the United States on Jan. 1, 1995. See note set out under section 3511 of this title.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 96 cases (9 in the last 5 years), 1982–2026 · leading case: Wind Tower Trade Coalition v. United States, 741 F.3d 89 (Fed. Cir. 2014).
Wind Tower Trade Coalition v. United States, 741 F.3d 89 (Fed. Cir. 2014). · cites it 4× “Pursuant to 19 U.S.C. §§ 1671b(a) and 1673b(a), the ITC issued a preliminary injury determination that there was a reasonable indication of threat of material injury to a domestic industry by reason of imports of subject merchandise from China and Vietnam.”
Am. Lamb Co. v. The United States, & New Zealand Meat Prods. Bd., Intervenors, 785 F.2d 994 (Fed. Cir. 1986). · cites it 2× “Accordingly, ITC instituted preliminary countervailing and antidumping investigations under sections 703(a) and 733(a), respectively, of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. §§ 1671b(a) and 1673b(a), to determine whether there is a reasonable indication that an industry…”
Gov't of Sri Lanka v. United States, 2018 CIT 43 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2018). · cites it 4× “19 U.S.C. § 1671b(b)(4)(C)(i). It is well settled that, to the degree United States domestic law is inconsistent with the United States' international treaty obligations in the area of trade, the court shall apply domestic law and the remedy "is strictly a matter for Congress.”
Norsk Hydro Canada, Inc. v. United States, & U.S. Magnesium LLC, 472 F.3d 1347 (Fed. Cir. 2006). “19 U.S.C. § 1671b(b). At the time of this request, U.”
Shenyang Yuanda Aluminum Indus. Eng'g Co. v. United States, 2014 CIT 10 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2014). · cites it 3× “§ 1673b(d)(3); 19 U.S.C. § 1671b(d)(3) (2006). In the antidumping duty investigation, the preliminary determination was published on November 12, 2010, and the four-month period was extended.”
Calabrian Corp. v. United States Int'l Trade Comm'n, 794 F. Supp. 377 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1992). · cites it 3× “19 U.S.C. §§ 1671b(a) and 1673b(a) (1988).”
Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. The United States, 742 F.2d 1405 (Fed. Cir. 1984). · cites it 4× “19 U.S.C. § 1671b(a). 3 . Under the DFE, an exporter is given a sum of money at the time its merchandise is exported.”
Gov't of the People's Repub. of China v. United States, 483 F. Supp. 2d 1274 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2007). · cites it 2× “19 U.S.C. § 1671b(b) (2000). 13 If Commerce makes an affirmative preliminary determination, the agency must then make its final determination within seventy-five days after the date of the preliminary determination.”
United States Steel Corp. v. United States, 618 F. Supp. 496 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1985). · cites it 5× “Liquidation was suspended on that date pursuant to § 703 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1671b(d)(1) (1982). The next day, plaintiff made its postponement request for its countervailing duty cases under § 606 of the Trade and Tariff Act of 1984, 19 U.”
Repub. Steel Corp. v. United States, 591 F. Supp. 640 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1984). · cites it 2× “1 The ITC made these preliminary determinations in February and June of 1982 pursuant to section 703(a) of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979 (the Act) (19 U.S.C. § 1671b(a)). 2 These seven determinations affected seven kinds of steel products, coming from three countries, Brazil,…”
PPG Indus., Inc. v. United States, 660 F. Supp. 965 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1987). · cites it 2× “The ITA must issue a preliminary countervailing duty determination, pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1671b, within a statutorily set amount of days after the initiation of an investigation.”
Maverick Tube Corp. v. United States, 2017 CIT 146 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2017). “Under 19 U.S.C. § 1671b(b)(4)(A), if the “aggregate of the net countervailable subsidies is less than 1 percent ad valorem,” then Commerce will disregard such de minimis countervailable subsidies.”
— 19 U.S.C. § 1671b(a) — 19 cases
Am. Lamb Co. v. The United States, & New Zealand Meat Prods. Bd., Intervenors, 785 F.2d 994 (Fed. Cir. 1986). “Accordingly, ITC instituted preliminary countervailing and antidumping investigations under sections 703(a) and 733(a), respectively, of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. §§ 1671b(a) and 1673b(a), to determine whether there is a reasonable indication that an industry…”
Wind Tower Trade Coalition v. United States, 741 F.3d 89 (Fed. Cir. 2014). “Pursuant to 19 U.S.C. §§ 1671b(a) and 1673b(a), the ITC issued a preliminary injury determination that there was a reasonable indication of threat of material injury to a domestic industry by reason of imports of subject merchandise from China and Vietnam.”
Repub. Steel Corp. v. United States, 591 F. Supp. 640 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1984). “1 The ITC made these preliminary determinations in February and June of 1982 pursuant to section 703(a) of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979 (the Act) (19 U.S.C. § 1671b(a)). 2 These seven determinations affected seven kinds of steel products, coming from three countries, Brazil,…”
Calabrian Corp. v. United States Int'l Trade Comm'n, 794 F. Supp. 377 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1992). “19 U.S.C. §§ 1671b(a) and 1673b(a) (1988).”
British Steel Corp. v. United States, 605 F. Supp. 286 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1985).
— 19 U.S.C. § 1671b(a)(1) — 4 cases
Nucor Corp. v. United States, 296 F. Supp. 3d 1276 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2018).
Nucor Fastener Div. v. United States, 751 F. Supp. 2d 1327 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2010).
Nucor Fastener Div. v. United States, 2013 CIT 65 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2013).
Aristech Chem. Corp. v. United States, 20 Ct. Int'l Trade 353 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1996).
— 19 U.S.C. § 1671b(a)(1)(A) — 1 case
In Re Us (Fed. Cir. 2026).
— 19 U.S.C. § 1671b(a)(l) — 2 cases
Nucor Fastener Div. v. United States, 751 F. Supp. 2d 1327 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2010).
Alloy Piping Prods., Inc. v. Kanzen Tetsu Sdn. Bhd., 334 F.3d 1284 (Fed. Cir. 2003).
— 19 U.S.C. § 1671b(a)(l)(1994) — 1 case
— 19 U.S.C. § 1671b(a)(l)(A) — 2 cases
Calabrian Corp. v. United States Int'l Trade Comm'n, 794 F. Supp. 377 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1992). “19 U.S.C. §§ 1671b(a) and 1673b(a) (1988).”
Suramerica De Aleaciones Laminadas, C.A. v. United States, 818 F. Supp. 348 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1993).
— 19 U.S.C. § 1671b(b) — 15 cases
Norsk Hydro Canada, Inc. v. United States, & U.S. Magnesium LLC, 472 F.3d 1347 (Fed. Cir. 2006). “19 U.S.C. § 1671b(b). At the time of this request, U.”
Saarstahl Ag v. United States, 858 F. Supp. 196 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1994).
Gov't of the People's Repub. of China v. United States, 483 F. Supp. 2d 1274 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2007). “19 U.S.C. § 1671b(b) (2000). 13 If Commerce makes an affirmative preliminary determination, the agency must then make its final determination within seventy-five days after the date of the preliminary determination.”
Repub. Steel Corp. v. United States, 591 F. Supp. 640 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1984). “1 The ITC made these preliminary determinations in February and June of 1982 pursuant to section 703(a) of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979 (the Act) (19 U.S.C. § 1671b(a)). 2 These seven determinations affected seven kinds of steel products, coming from three countries, Brazil,…”
Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. The United States, 742 F.2d 1405 (Fed. Cir. 1984). “19 U.S.C. § 1671b(a). 3 . Under the DFE, an exporter is given a sum of money at the time its merchandise is exported.”
— 19 U.S.C. § 1671b(b)(4) — 8 cases
Gov't of Quebec v. United States, 105 F.4th 1359 (Fed. Cir. 2024).
Caribbean Ispat Ltd. v. United States, 366 F. Supp. 2d 1300 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2005).
PAO Severstal v. United States, 219 F. Supp. 3d 1411 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2017).
ArcelorMittal USA LLC v. United States, 2017 CIT 49 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2017).
Arcelormittal U.S. LLC v. United States, 2018 CIT 121 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2018).
— 19 U.S.C. § 1671b(b)(4)(A) — 4 cases
Maverick Tube Corp. v. United States, 2017 CIT 146 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2017). “Under 19 U.S.C. § 1671b(b)(4)(A), if the “aggregate of the net countervailable subsidies is less than 1 percent ad valorem,” then Commerce will disregard such de minimis countervailable subsidies.”
Nucor Corp. v. United States, 286 F. Supp. 3d 1364 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2018).
AG Der Dillinger Huttenwerke v. United States, 193 F. Supp. 2d 1339 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2002).
Teknik Aluminyum Sanayi A.S. v. United States, 2023 CIT 33 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2023).
— 19 U.S.C. § 1671b(b)(4)(B) — 2 cases
Royal Thai Gov't v. United States, 441 F. Supp. 2d 1350 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2006).
Royal Thai Gov't v. United States, 341 F. Supp. 2d 1315 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2004).
— 19 U.S.C. § 1671b(b)(4)(C)(i) — 1 case
Gov't of Sri Lanka v. United States, 2018 CIT 43 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2018). “19 U.S.C. § 1671b(b)(4)(C)(i). It is well settled that, to the degree United States domestic law is inconsistent with the United States' international treaty obligations in the area of trade, the court shall apply domestic law and the remedy "is strictly a matter for Congress.”
— 19 U.S.C. § 1671b(b)(4)(D)(i) — 1 case
Gov't of Sri Lanka v. United States, 2018 CIT 43 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2018). “19 U.S.C. § 1671b(b)(4)(C)(i). It is well settled that, to the degree United States domestic law is inconsistent with the United States' international treaty obligations in the area of trade, the court shall apply domestic law and the remedy "is strictly a matter for Congress.”
— 19 U.S.C. § 1671b(b)(l) — 1 case
Imperial Sugar Co. v. United States, 181 F. Supp. 3d 1284 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2016).
— 19 U.S.C. § 1671b(c) — 2 cases
Repub. Steel Corp. v. United States, 4 Ct. Int'l Trade 17 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1982).
United States Steel Corp. v. United States, 6 Ct. Int'l Trade 45 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1983).
— 19 U.S.C. § 1671b(c)(l) — 3 cases
Gov't of the People's Repub. of China v. United States, 483 F. Supp. 2d 1274 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2007). “19 U.S.C. § 1671b(b) (2000). 13 If Commerce makes an affirmative preliminary determination, the agency must then make its final determination within seventy-five days after the date of the preliminary determination.”
Dupont Teijin Films USA, LP v. United States, 2003 CIT 167 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2003).
Dupont Teijin Films USA, LP v. United States, 2004 CIT 70 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2004).
— 19 U.S.C. § 1671b(c)(l)(B) — 1 case
Timken Co. v. United States, 659 F. Supp. 239 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1987).
— 19 U.S.C. § 1671b(c)(l)(B)(i) — 4 cases
Alberta Pork Producers' Mktg. Bd. v. United States, 669 F. Supp. 445 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1987).
Cementos Guadalajara, S.A. v. United States, 686 F. Supp. 335 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1988).
Cementos Anahuac Del Golfo, S.A. v. United States, 689 F. Supp. 1191 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1988).
SolarWorld Americas, Inc. v. United States, 2015 CIT 137 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2015).
— 19 U.S.C. § 1671b(d) — 10 cases
Wind Tower Trade Coalition v. United States, 741 F.3d 89 (Fed. Cir. 2014). “Pursuant to 19 U.S.C. §§ 1671b(a) and 1673b(a), the ITC issued a preliminary injury determination that there was a reasonable indication of threat of material injury to a domestic industry by reason of imports of subject merchandise from China and Vietnam.”
PPG Indus., Inc. v. United States, 660 F. Supp. 965 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1987). “The ITA must issue a preliminary countervailing duty determination, pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1671b, within a statutorily set amount of days after the initiation of an investigation.”
PPG Indus., Inc. v. United States, 746 F. Supp. 119 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1990).
Wind Tower Trade Coalition v. United States, 2013 CIT 44 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2013).
Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. The United States, 742 F.2d 1405 (Fed. Cir. 1984). “19 U.S.C. § 1671b(a). 3 . Under the DFE, an exporter is given a sum of money at the time its merchandise is exported.”
— 19 U.S.C. § 1671b(d)(1) — 4 cases
MacLean-fogg Co. v. United States, 753 F.3d 1237 (Fed. Cir. 2014).
Rheem Metalurgica S/A v. United States, 20 Ct. Int'l Trade 1450 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1996).
United States Steel Corp. v. United States, 618 F. Supp. 496 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1985). “Liquidation was suspended on that date pursuant to § 703 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1671b(d)(1) (1982). The next day, plaintiff made its postponement request for its countervailing duty cases under § 606 of the Trade and Tariff Act of 1984, 19 U.”
United States Steel Corp. v. United States, 6 Ct. Int'l Trade 45 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1983).
— 19 U.S.C. § 1671b(d)(2) — 11 cases
Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v. United States, 650 F. Supp. 2d 1331 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2009).
Tembec, Inc. v. United States, 461 F. Supp. 2d 1355 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2006).
Rheem Metalurgica S/A v. United States, 20 Ct. Int'l Trade 1450 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1996).
Wind Tower Trade Coalition v. United States, 2013 CIT 44 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2013).
— 19 U.S.C. § 1671b(d)(2)(B) — 2 cases
MTD Prods. Inc. v. United States, 2023 CIT 34 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2023).
MTD Prods. Inc. v. United States, 2023 CIT 34 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2023).
— 19 U.S.C. § 1671b(d)(3) — 1 case
Shenyang Yuanda Aluminum Indus. Eng'g Co. v. United States, 2014 CIT 10 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2014). “§ 1673b(d)(3); 19 U.S.C. § 1671b(d)(3) (2006). In the antidumping duty investigation, the preliminary determination was published on November 12, 2010, and the four-month period was extended.”
— 19 U.S.C. § 1671b(d)(l) — 6 cases
Tembec, Inc. v. United States, 441 F. Supp. 2d 1302 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2006).
United States Steel Corp. v. United States, 566 F. Supp. 1529 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1983).
United States Steel Corp. v. United States, 618 F. Supp. 496 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1985). “Liquidation was suspended on that date pursuant to § 703 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1671b(d)(1) (1982). The next day, plaintiff made its postponement request for its countervailing duty cases under § 606 of the Trade and Tariff Act of 1984, 19 U.”
United States Steel Corp. v. United States, 614 F. Supp. 1241 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1985).
F.lli De Cecco di Filippo Fara San Martino S.p.A. v. United States, 21 Ct. Int'l Trade 1130 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1997).
— 19 U.S.C. § 1671b(d)(l)(B) — 1 case
Sunpreme Inc. v. United States, 181 F. Supp. 3d 1322 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2016).
— 19 U.S.C. § 1671b(e) — 3 cases
Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. The United States, 742 F.2d 1405 (Fed. Cir. 1984). “19 U.S.C. § 1671b(a). 3 . Under the DFE, an exporter is given a sum of money at the time its merchandise is exported.”
Pistachio Grp. of Ass'n of Food Indus., Inc. v. United States, 638 F. Supp. 1340 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1986).
Canadian Meat Council v. United States, 680 F. Supp. 390 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1988).
— 19 U.S.C. § 1671b(e)(2) — 3 cases
GPX Int'l Tire Corp v. United States, 2013 CIT 2 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2013).
United States Steel Corp. v. United States, 618 F. Supp. 496 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1985). “Liquidation was suspended on that date pursuant to § 703 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1671b(d)(1) (1982). The next day, plaintiff made its postponement request for its countervailing duty cases under § 606 of the Trade and Tariff Act of 1984, 19 U.”
Celik Halat ve Tel Sanayi A.S. v. United States, 2020 CIT 176 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2020).
— 19 U.S.C. § 1671b(f) — 1 case
Int'l Trading Co. v. United States, 110 F. Supp. 2d 977 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2000).
— 19 U.S.C. § 1671b(h) — 1 case
United States Steel Corp. v. United States, 618 F. Supp. 496 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1985). “Liquidation was suspended on that date pursuant to § 703 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1671b(d)(1) (1982). The next day, plaintiff made its postponement request for its countervailing duty cases under § 606 of the Trade and Tariff Act of 1984, 19 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.