19 U.S.C. § 1675c
Repealed. Pub. L. 109–171, title VII, § 7601(a), Feb. 8, 2006, 120 Stat. 154
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 106
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2002–2025 · leading case: SKF USA, Inc. v. United States Customs & Border Prot., 556 F.3d 1337 (Fed. Cir. 2009).
SKF USA, Inc. v. United States Customs & Border Prot., 556 F.3d 1337 (Fed. Cir. 2009). “1549 , 1549A-72-75 (codified at 19 U.S.C. § 1675c (2000)), repealed by Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, Pub.”
Cathedral Candle Co. v. United States Int'l Trade Comm'n, 400 F.3d 1352 (Fed. Cir. 2005). “” 19 U.S.C. § 1675c. The statute defines an affected domestic producer as a party *1358 that was a petitioner or supporter of an antidumping or countervailing duty petition and that continues to produce the product that was the subject- of the resulting order.”
Giorgio Foods, Inc. v. United States, 785 F.3d 595 (Fed. Cir. 2015). “1549 , 1549A–72 to –75 (codified at 19 U.S.C. § 1675c GIORGIO FOODS, INC. v. US 3 ameliorate the injurious effects of dumping and illegal subsidies by distributing portions of collected antidump- ing and countervailing duties to U.”
Skf USA Inc. v. United States, 451 F. Supp. 2d 1355 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2006). “1549A-72 to 75 (2000), codified as 19 U.S.C. § 1675c (2000). Under the CDSOA, Customs collects duties pursuant to antidumping duty orders and places the monies in special accounts within the United States Treasury.”
Canadian Lumber Trade All. v. United States, 517 F.3d 1319 (Fed. Cir. 2008). “" 19 U.S.C. § 1675c (2000). Following enactment of the CDSOA, United States Customs and Border Protection ("Customs") began distributing duties assessed on imported goods, including on goods imported from NAFTA countries Canada and Mexico, to domestic producers.”
S. Shrimp All. v. United States, 617 F. Supp. 2d 1334 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2009). “Customs and Border Protection (“Customs”) of the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act, Section 754 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1675c (2000) 1 (“CDSOA”), repealed by the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, Pub.”
Cathedral Candle Co. v. United States Int'l Trade Comm'n, 285 F. Supp. 2d 1371 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2003). “19 U.S.C. § 1675c (2000). The Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.”
PS Chez Sidney, L.L.C. v. United States Int'l Trade Comm'n, 502 F. Supp. 2d 1318 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2007). “19 U.S.C. § 1675c (2000), Pub.L. No. 106-387, Title X § 1002, 114 Stat.”
Furniture Brands Int'l, Inc. v. United States, 2011 CIT 132 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2011). “1549 , 1549A-72-75 (codified at 19 U.S.C. § 1675c (2000)), 1 repealed by Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, Pub.”
Canadian Lumber Trade All. v. United States, 425 F. Supp. 2d 1321 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2006). “1549 , 1623 (2000) codified at 19 U.S.C. § 1675c (the “Byrd Amendment”).”
Ashley Furniture Indus., Inc. v. United States, 734 F.3d 1306 (Fed. Cir. 2013). “See 19 U.S.C. § 1675c(a), (d)(1) (2000) (repealed by Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, Pub L.”
Sioux Honey Ass'n v. Hartford Fire Ins., 672 F.3d 1041 (Fed. Cir. 2012). “1549 , 1549A-72-75 (codified at 19 U.S.C. § 1675c (2000)), repealed by Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, Pub.”
— 19 U.S.C. § 1675c(1)(A) — 1 case
SKF USA, Inc. v. United States Customs & Border Prot., 556 F.3d 1337 (Fed. Cir. 2009). “1549 , 1549A-72-75 (codified at 19 U.S.C. § 1675c (2000)), repealed by Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, Pub.”
— 19 U.S.C. § 1675c(a) — 47 cases
SKF USA, Inc. v. United States Customs & Border Prot., 556 F.3d 1337 (Fed. Cir. 2009). “1549 , 1549A-72-75 (codified at 19 U.S.C. § 1675c (2000)), repealed by Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, Pub.”
Sioux Honey Ass'n v. Hartford Fire Ins., 672 F.3d 1041 (Fed. Cir. 2012). “1549 , 1549A-72-75 (codified at 19 U.S.C. § 1675c (2000)), repealed by Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, Pub.”
Giorgio Foods, Inc. v. United States, 785 F.3d 595 (Fed. Cir. 2015). “1549 , 1549A–72 to –75 (codified at 19 U.S.C. § 1675c GIORGIO FOODS, INC. v. US 3 ameliorate the injurious effects of dumping and illegal subsidies by distributing portions of collected antidump- ing and countervailing duties to U.”
Ashley Furniture Indus., Inc. v. United States, 734 F.3d 1306 (Fed. Cir. 2013). “See 19 U.S.C. § 1675c(a), (d)(1) (2000) (repealed by Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, Pub L.”
Canadian Lumber Trade All. v. United States, 517 F.3d 1319 (Fed. Cir. 2008). “" 19 U.S.C. § 1675c (2000). Following enactment of the CDSOA, United States Customs and Border Protection ("Customs") began distributing duties assessed on imported goods, including on goods imported from NAFTA countries Canada and Mexico, to domestic producers.”
— 19 U.S.C. § 1675c(a)(6) — 1 case
PS Chez Sidney, LLC v. United States Int'l Trade Comm'n, 442 F. Supp. 2d 1329 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2006).
— 19 U.S.C. § 1675c(b) — 4 cases
SKF USA, Inc. v. United States Customs & Border Prot., 556 F.3d 1337 (Fed. Cir. 2009). “1549 , 1549A-72-75 (codified at 19 U.S.C. § 1675c (2000)), repealed by Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, Pub.”
Skf USA Inc. v. United States, 451 F. Supp. 2d 1355 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2006). “1549A-72 to 75 (2000), codified as 19 U.S.C. § 1675c (2000). Under the CDSOA, Customs collects duties pursuant to antidumping duty orders and places the monies in special accounts within the United States Treasury.”
Cathedral Candle Co. v. United States Int'l Trade Comm'n, 285 F. Supp. 2d 1371 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2003). “19 U.S.C. § 1675c (2000). The Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.”
The Barden Corp. v. United States, 2012 CIT 85 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2012).
— 19 U.S.C. § 1675c(b)(1) — 13 cases
Canadian Lumber Trade All. v. United States, 517 F.3d 1319 (Fed. Cir. 2008). “" 19 U.S.C. § 1675c (2000). Following enactment of the CDSOA, United States Customs and Border Protection ("Customs") began distributing duties assessed on imported goods, including on goods imported from NAFTA countries Canada and Mexico, to domestic producers.”
Furniture Brands Int'l, Inc. v. United States, 2011 CIT 132 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2011). “1549 , 1549A-72-75 (codified at 19 U.S.C. § 1675c (2000)), 1 repealed by Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, Pub.”
Skf USA Inc. v. United States, 451 F. Supp. 2d 1355 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2006). “1549A-72 to 75 (2000), codified as 19 U.S.C. § 1675c (2000). Under the CDSOA, Customs collects duties pursuant to antidumping duty orders and places the monies in special accounts within the United States Treasury.”
Cathedral Candle Co. v. United States Int'l Trade Comm'n, 285 F. Supp. 2d 1371 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2003). “19 U.S.C. § 1675c (2000). The Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.”
Hilex Poly Co. v. United States, 2020 CIT 77 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2020).
— 19 U.S.C. § 1675c(b)(1)(A) — 12 cases
SKF USA, Inc. v. United States Customs & Border Prot., 556 F.3d 1337 (Fed. Cir. 2009). “1549 , 1549A-72-75 (codified at 19 U.S.C. § 1675c (2000)), repealed by Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, Pub.”
Jodelle Kirk v. Schaeffler Grp. USA, 887 F.3d 376 (8th Cir. 2018).
Skf USA Inc. v. United States, 451 F. Supp. 2d 1355 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2006). “1549A-72 to 75 (2000), codified as 19 U.S.C. § 1675c (2000). Under the CDSOA, Customs collects duties pursuant to antidumping duty orders and places the monies in special accounts within the United States Treasury.”
Ashley Furniture Indus., Inc. v. United States, 734 F.3d 1306 (Fed. Cir. 2013). “See 19 U.S.C. § 1675c(a), (d)(1) (2000) (repealed by Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, Pub L.”
Furniture Brands Int'l, Inc. v. United States, 2011 CIT 132 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2011). “1549 , 1549A-72-75 (codified at 19 U.S.C. § 1675c (2000)), 1 repealed by Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, Pub.”
— 19 U.S.C. § 1675c(b)(4) — 9 cases
Canadian Lumber Trade All. v. United States, 517 F.3d 1319 (Fed. Cir. 2008). “" 19 U.S.C. § 1675c (2000). Following enactment of the CDSOA, United States Customs and Border Protection ("Customs") began distributing duties assessed on imported goods, including on goods imported from NAFTA countries Canada and Mexico, to domestic producers.”
S. Shrimp All. v. United States, 617 F. Supp. 2d 1334 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2009). “Customs and Border Protection (“Customs”) of the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act, Section 754 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1675c (2000) 1 (“CDSOA”), repealed by the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, Pub.”
Canadian Lumber Trade All. v. United States, 425 F. Supp. 2d 1321 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2006). “1549 , 1623 (2000) codified at 19 U.S.C. § 1675c (the “Byrd Amendment”).”
Huaiyin Foreign Trade Corp. (30) v. United States Dep't of Com., 201 F. Supp. 2d 1351 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2002).
Hartford Fire Ins. v. United States, 507 F. Supp. 2d 1331 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2007).
— 19 U.S.C. § 1675c(b)(4)(I) — 1 case
S. Shrimp All. v. United States, 617 F. Supp. 2d 1334 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2009). “Customs and Border Protection (“Customs”) of the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act, Section 754 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1675c (2000) 1 (“CDSOA”), repealed by the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, Pub.”
— 19 U.S.C. § 1675c(b)(5) — 1 case
Barden Corp. v. United States, 2016 CIT 12 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2016).
— 19 U.S.C. § 1675c(b)(l) — 15 cases
Ethan Allen Global, Inc. v. United States, 2012 CIT 11 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2012).
Pat Huval Restaurant & Oyster Bar, Inc. v. Int'l Trade Comm'n, 785 F.3d 638 (Fed. Cir. 2015).
Candle Corp. of Am. v. United States Int'l Trade Comm'n, 259 F. Supp. 2d 1349 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2003).
PS Chez Sidney, L.L.C. v. United States Int'l Trade Comm'n, 502 F. Supp. 2d 1318 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2007). “19 U.S.C. § 1675c (2000), Pub.L. No. 106-387, Title X § 1002, 114 Stat.”
Ashley Furniture Indus., Inc. v. United States, 818 F. Supp. 2d 1355 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2012).
— 19 U.S.C. § 1675c(b)(l)(A) — 15 cases
SKF USA, Inc. v. United States Customs & Border Prot., 556 F.3d 1337 (Fed. Cir. 2009). “1549 , 1549A-72-75 (codified at 19 U.S.C. § 1675c (2000)), repealed by Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, Pub.”
PS Chez Sidney, L.L.C. v. United States Int'l Trade Comm'n, 502 F. Supp. 2d 1318 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2007). “19 U.S.C. § 1675c (2000), Pub.L. No. 106-387, Title X § 1002, 114 Stat.”
Skf USA Inc. v. United States, 451 F. Supp. 2d 1355 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2006). “1549A-72 to 75 (2000), codified as 19 U.S.C. § 1675c (2000). Under the CDSOA, Customs collects duties pursuant to antidumping duty orders and places the monies in special accounts within the United States Treasury.”
Giorgio Foods, Inc. v. United States, 785 F.3d 595 (Fed. Cir. 2015). “1549 , 1549A–72 to –75 (codified at 19 U.S.C. § 1675c GIORGIO FOODS, INC. v. US 3 ameliorate the injurious effects of dumping and illegal subsidies by distributing portions of collected antidump- ing and countervailing duties to U.”
Nan Ya Plastics Corp., Am. v. United States, 2012 CIT 92 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2012).
— 19 U.S.C. § 1675c(b)(l)(B) — 3 cases
Candle Corp. of Am. v. United States Int'l Trade Comm'n, 259 F. Supp. 2d 1349 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2003).
Five Rivers Elec. Innovation, LLC v. United States, 755 F. Supp. 2d 1349 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2011).
PS Chez Sidney, L.L.C. v. United States Int'l Trade Comm'n, 558 F. Supp. 2d 1370 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2008).
— 19 U.S.C. § 1675c(c) — 8 cases
Cathedral Candle Co. v. United States Int'l Trade Comm'n, 400 F.3d 1352 (Fed. Cir. 2005). “” 19 U.S.C. § 1675c. The statute defines an affected domestic producer as a party *1358 that was a petitioner or supporter of an antidumping or countervailing duty petition and that continues to produce the product that was the subject- of the resulting order.”
S. Shrimp All. v. United States, 617 F. Supp. 2d 1334 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2009). “Customs and Border Protection (“Customs”) of the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act, Section 754 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1675c (2000) 1 (“CDSOA”), repealed by the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, Pub.”
Cathedral Candle Co. v. United States Int'l Trade Comm'n, 285 F. Supp. 2d 1371 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2003). “19 U.S.C. § 1675c (2000). The Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.”
Candle Artisans, Inc. v. United States Int'l Trade Comm'n, 362 F. Supp. 2d 1352 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2005).
Skf USA Inc. v. United States, 502 F. Supp. 2d 1325 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2007).
— 19 U.S.C. § 1675c(d) — 10 cases
SKF USA, Inc. v. United States Customs & Border Prot., 556 F.3d 1337 (Fed. Cir. 2009). “1549 , 1549A-72-75 (codified at 19 U.S.C. § 1675c (2000)), repealed by Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, Pub.”
Cathedral Candle Co. v. United States Int'l Trade Comm'n, 400 F.3d 1352 (Fed. Cir. 2005). “” 19 U.S.C. § 1675c. The statute defines an affected domestic producer as a party *1358 that was a petitioner or supporter of an antidumping or countervailing duty petition and that continues to produce the product that was the subject- of the resulting order.”
Skf USA Inc. v. United States, 451 F. Supp. 2d 1355 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2006). “1549A-72 to 75 (2000), codified as 19 U.S.C. § 1675c (2000). Under the CDSOA, Customs collects duties pursuant to antidumping duty orders and places the monies in special accounts within the United States Treasury.”
Ashley Furniture Indus., Inc. v. United States, 734 F.3d 1306 (Fed. Cir. 2013). “See 19 U.S.C. § 1675c(a), (d)(1) (2000) (repealed by Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, Pub L.”
PS Chez Sidney, LLC v. United States Int'l Trade Comm'n, 442 F. Supp. 2d 1329 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2006).
— 19 U.S.C. § 1675c(d)(1) — 13 cases
Skf USA Inc. v. United States, 451 F. Supp. 2d 1355 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2006). “1549A-72 to 75 (2000), codified as 19 U.S.C. § 1675c (2000). Under the CDSOA, Customs collects duties pursuant to antidumping duty orders and places the monies in special accounts within the United States Treasury.”
Giorgio Foods, Inc. v. United States, 785 F.3d 595 (Fed. Cir. 2015). “1549 , 1549A–72 to –75 (codified at 19 U.S.C. § 1675c GIORGIO FOODS, INC. v. US 3 ameliorate the injurious effects of dumping and illegal subsidies by distributing portions of collected antidump- ing and countervailing duties to U.”
Ashley Furniture Indus., Inc. v. United States, 734 F.3d 1306 (Fed. Cir. 2013). “See 19 U.S.C. § 1675c(a), (d)(1) (2000) (repealed by Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, Pub L.”
SKF USA, Inc. v. United States Customs & Border Prot., 556 F.3d 1337 (Fed. Cir. 2009). “1549 , 1549A-72-75 (codified at 19 U.S.C. § 1675c (2000)), repealed by Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, Pub.”
Furniture Brands Int'l, Inc. v. United States, 2011 CIT 132 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2011). “1549 , 1549A-72-75 (codified at 19 U.S.C. § 1675c (2000)), 1 repealed by Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, Pub.”
— 19 U.S.C. § 1675c(d)(2) — 11 cases
Cathedral Candle Co. v. United States Int'l Trade Comm'n, 400 F.3d 1352 (Fed. Cir. 2005). “” 19 U.S.C. § 1675c. The statute defines an affected domestic producer as a party *1358 that was a petitioner or supporter of an antidumping or countervailing duty petition and that continues to produce the product that was the subject- of the resulting order.”
Giorgio Foods, Inc. v. United States, 785 F.3d 595 (Fed. Cir. 2015). “1549 , 1549A–72 to –75 (codified at 19 U.S.C. § 1675c GIORGIO FOODS, INC. v. US 3 ameliorate the injurious effects of dumping and illegal subsidies by distributing portions of collected antidump- ing and countervailing duties to U.”
S. Shrimp All. v. United States, 617 F. Supp. 2d 1334 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2009). “Customs and Border Protection (“Customs”) of the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act, Section 754 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1675c (2000) 1 (“CDSOA”), repealed by the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, Pub.”
Cathedral Candle Co. v. United States Int'l Trade Comm'n, 285 F. Supp. 2d 1371 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2003). “19 U.S.C. § 1675c (2000). The Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.”
Dixon Ticonderoga Co. v. United States Customs & Border Prot., 366 F. Supp. 2d 1352 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2005).
— 19 U.S.C. § 1675c(d)(2)(B) — 1 case
PS Chez Sidney, L.L.C. v. United States Int'l Trade Comm'n, 502 F. Supp. 2d 1318 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2007). “19 U.S.C. § 1675c (2000), Pub.L. No. 106-387, Title X § 1002, 114 Stat.”
— 19 U.S.C. § 1675c(d)(3) — 8 cases
S. Shrimp All. v. United States, 617 F. Supp. 2d 1334 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2009). “Customs and Border Protection (“Customs”) of the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act, Section 754 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1675c (2000) 1 (“CDSOA”), repealed by the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, Pub.”
Giorgio Foods, Inc. v. United States, 785 F.3d 595 (Fed. Cir. 2015). “1549 , 1549A–72 to –75 (codified at 19 U.S.C. § 1675c GIORGIO FOODS, INC. v. US 3 ameliorate the injurious effects of dumping and illegal subsidies by distributing portions of collected antidump- ing and countervailing duties to U.”
Furniture Brands Int'l, Inc. v. United States, 2011 CIT 132 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2011). “1549 , 1549A-72-75 (codified at 19 U.S.C. § 1675c (2000)), 1 repealed by Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, Pub.”
Dixon Ticonderoga Co. v. United States Customs & Border Prot., 366 F. Supp. 2d 1352 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2005).
Skf USA Inc. v. United States, 502 F. Supp. 2d 1325 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2007).
— 19 U.S.C. § 1675c(d)(l) — 22 cases
Cathedral Candle Co. v. United States Int'l Trade Comm'n, 400 F.3d 1352 (Fed. Cir. 2005). “” 19 U.S.C. § 1675c. The statute defines an affected domestic producer as a party *1358 that was a petitioner or supporter of an antidumping or countervailing duty petition and that continues to produce the product that was the subject- of the resulting order.”
Giorgio Foods, Inc. v. United States, 785 F.3d 595 (Fed. Cir. 2015). “1549 , 1549A–72 to –75 (codified at 19 U.S.C. § 1675c GIORGIO FOODS, INC. v. US 3 ameliorate the injurious effects of dumping and illegal subsidies by distributing portions of collected antidump- ing and countervailing duties to U.”
PS Chez Sidney, L.L.C. v. United States Int'l Trade Comm'n, 502 F. Supp. 2d 1318 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2007). “19 U.S.C. § 1675c (2000), Pub.L. No. 106-387, Title X § 1002, 114 Stat.”
Ashley Furniture Indus., Inc. v. United States, 818 F. Supp. 2d 1355 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2012).
SKF USA, Inc. v. United States Customs & Border Prot., 556 F.3d 1337 (Fed. Cir. 2009). “1549 , 1549A-72-75 (codified at 19 U.S.C. § 1675c (2000)), repealed by Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, Pub.”
— 19 U.S.C. § 1675c(e) — 8 cases
Canadian Lumber Trade All. v. United States, 425 F. Supp. 2d 1321 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2006). “1549 , 1623 (2000) codified at 19 U.S.C. § 1675c (the “Byrd Amendment”).”
S. Shrimp All. v. United States, 617 F. Supp. 2d 1334 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2009). “Customs and Border Protection (“Customs”) of the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act, Section 754 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1675c (2000) 1 (“CDSOA”), repealed by the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, Pub.”
Hartford Fire Ins. v. United States, 544 F.3d 1289 (Fed. Cir. 2008).
Skf USA Inc. v. United States, 451 F. Supp. 2d 1355 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2006). “1549A-72 to 75 (2000), codified as 19 U.S.C. § 1675c (2000). Under the CDSOA, Customs collects duties pursuant to antidumping duty orders and places the monies in special accounts within the United States Treasury.”
Cathedral Candle Co. v. United States Int'l Trade Comm'n, 285 F. Supp. 2d 1371 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2003). “19 U.S.C. § 1675c (2000). The Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.”
— 19 U.S.C. § 1675c(e)(1) — 3 cases
Hilex Poly Co. v. United States, 2020 CIT 77 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2020).
Am. Drew v. United States, 2020 CIT 76 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2020).
Adee Honey Farms v. United States, 2020 CIT 75 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2020).
— 19 U.S.C. § 1675c(e)(2) — 3 cases
Canadian Lumber Trade All. v. United States, 517 F.3d 1319 (Fed. Cir. 2008). “" 19 U.S.C. § 1675c (2000). Following enactment of the CDSOA, United States Customs and Border Protection ("Customs") began distributing duties assessed on imported goods, including on goods imported from NAFTA countries Canada and Mexico, to domestic producers.”
Adee Honey Farms v. United States (Fed. Cir. 2024).
Adee Honey Farms v. United States, 107 F.4th 1322 (Fed. Cir. 2024).
— 19 U.S.C. § 1675c(e)(3) — 3 cases
S. Shrimp All. v. United States, 617 F. Supp. 2d 1334 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2009). “Customs and Border Protection (“Customs”) of the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act, Section 754 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1675c (2000) 1 (“CDSOA”), repealed by the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, Pub.”
Adee Honey Farms v. United States (Fed. Cir. 2024).
Adee Honey Farms v. United States, 107 F.4th 1322 (Fed. Cir. 2024).
— 19 U.S.C. § 1675c(l)(A) — 2 cases
SKF USA, Inc. v. United States Customs & Border Prot., 556 F.3d 1337 (Fed. Cir. 2009). “1549 , 1549A-72-75 (codified at 19 U.S.C. § 1675c (2000)), repealed by Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, Pub.”
PS Chez Sidney, L.L.C. v. United States Int'l Trade Comm'n, 502 F. Supp. 2d 1318 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2007). “19 U.S.C. § 1675c (2000), Pub.L. No. 106-387, Title X § 1002, 114 Stat.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.