19 U.S.C. § 231
Repealed. June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title IV, § 651(a)(1), 46 Stat. 762
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases, 1925–1936 · leading case: Sturges v. Clark D. Pease, Inc., 48 F.2d 1035 (2d Cir. 1931).
Sturges v. Clark D. Pease, Inc., 48 F.2d 1035 (2d Cir. 1931). “* * *" 19 USCA § 231. "Sec. 526. (a) That it shall be unlawful to import into the United States any merchandise of foreign manufacture if such merchandise, or the label, sign, print, package, wrapper, or receptacle, bears a trade-mark owned by a citizen of, or by a corporation…”
R.R. Comm'n v. Texas & New Orleans R., 42 S.W.2d 1091 (Tex. App. 1931). “858 , 948 (19 USCA § 231 (b). But in everyday speech ‘vehicle’ calls up tbe picture of a thing moving on land.”
Porto Rico Brokerage Co. v. United States, 76 F.2d 605 (C.C.P.A. 1935). “However, due to the fact that it has not been incorporated into the United States, and is not an integral part thereof (although, for tariff purposes, it is included as a part of the United States by sections 401 of the Tariff Acts of 1922 and 1930 [19 USCA §§ 231, 1401]), but…”
United States v. Hunter, 80 F.2d 968 (5th Cir. 1936). “The Tariff Act of 1922, § 401, 19 U.S.C.A. § 231 , included aircraft among vessels and vehicles.”
In re Jackson, 35 F.2d 931 (N.D.N.Y. 1929). “Section 401 of the Tariff Act of 1922 (19 USCA § 231) classifies the airplane in question as a “vehicle.”
The Sebastopol, 56 F.2d 590 (2d Cir. 1932). “” The forfeiture thus directed is provided for in section 584 (19 USCA § 486), which declares, among other things, that unmanifested merchandise (which by section 401 [19 USCA § 231] includes merchandise the importation of which is forbidden), consigned to the master, shall be…”
United States v. McDermott, 7 Alaska 290 (D. Alaska 1925). “” Section 401 (19 USCA § 231 [U. S. Comp. St. § 5841d]).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.