19 U.S.C. § 2320
Regulations
The Secretary shall prescribe such regulations as may be necessary to carry out the provisions of this part.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13
cases, 1980–2006 · leading case: Woodrum v. Donovan, 564 F. Supp. 826 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1983).
Woodrum v. Donovan, 564 F. Supp. 826 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1983). “In the court’s view, the cited regulation comports with the intent of Congress as expressed in the statute to provide trade adjustment assistance only to workers of a firm which produces an import-impacted article.”
Former Employees of Elec. Data Sys. Corp. v. United States Sec'y of Labor, 350 F. Supp. 2d 1282 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2004). “While Congress has granted Labor the authority to “prescribe such regulations as may be necessary to carry out the provisions” of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2320 , Labor has not promulgated any regulations explicating the meaning of the term “article” for purposes of TAA.”
Ron Steen v. United States, 468 F.3d 1357 (Fed. Cir. 2006). “The 1974 Trade Act gave the Secretary of Labor authority “to prescribe such regulations as may be necessary to carry out the provisions” of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2320 , and the 2002 Trade Act gave the Secretary of Agriculture that authority with respect to the new provisions…”
Abbott v. Donovan, 570 F. Supp. 41 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1983). “Section 248 of the Trade Act of 1974, 19 U.S.C. § 2320 (1976), authorizes the Secretary of Labor to prescribe regulations for the implementation of the trade adjustment assistance program.”
Cherlin v. Donovan, 585 F. Supp. 644 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1984). “OTAA, as the Secretary’s designate pursuant to Section 248 of the Trade Act of 1974, 19 U.S.C. § 2320 (1976), is empowered to conduct an investigation into plaintiff’s petition.”
Tyler v. Donovan, 535 F. Supp. 691 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1982). “Section 248 of the Trade Act of 1974, 19 U.S.C. § 2320 (1976), authorizes the Secretary of Labor to prescribe regulations for the implementation of the provisions of the Act on worker adjustment assistance.”
Collins v. Marshall, 507 F. Supp. 83 (W.D. Mo. 1981). “The Secretary is authorized, under 19 U.S.C. § 2320 , to “prescribe such regulations as may be necessary to carry out the provisions of this part.”
Tyler v. United States Dep't of Labor, 752 F. Supp. 32 (D. Me. 1990). “See Levesque v. Block, 723 F.2d at 182. Moreover, from its inception the Secretary had issued detailed regulations on the Trade Act which were mandatory on the states.”
Wilson v. Commonwealth, 526 A.2d 452 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1987). “19 U.S.C. §2320 . Board brief at 8. We note that Petitioners local office recommended that his training be approved.”
Anderson v. Review Bd. of Indiana Emp. Sec. Div., 412 N.E.2d 819 (Ind. Ct. App. 1980). “In order for Anderson to qualify for TRA benefits, the Secretary of Labor of the United States must have certified the workers of Chrysler to be eligible to apply for adjustment assistance. 19 U.S.C. §§ 2271-2273 (1976). As the Review Board found, the Secretary of Labor…”
Anderson v. Review Bd. of Ind. Emp. Sec., 412 N.E.2d 819 (Ind. Ct. App. 1980). “[13] He is empowered to do so by 19 U.S.C. § 2320 (1976). [14] In order for Anderson to qualify for TRA benefits, the Secretary of Labor of the United States must have certified the workers of Chrysler to be eligible to apply for adjustment assistance.”
Steen v. United States (Fed. Cir. 2006). “The 1974 Trade Act gave the Secretary of Labor authority “to prescribe such regulations as may be necessary to carry out the provisions” of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2320 , and the 2002 Trade Act gave the Secretary of Agriculture that authority with respect to the new provisions…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.