19 U.S.C. § 2501
Short title
This Act may be cited as the “Trade Agreements Act of 1979”.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 29
cases (5 in the last 5 years), 2000–2025 · leading case: United States ex rel. Folliard v. Comstor Corp., 308 F. Supp. 3d 56 (D.C. Cir. 2018).
United States ex rel. Folliard v. Comstor Corp., 308 F. Supp. 3d 56 (D.C. Cir. 2018). “("Cisco") that originated in non-designated countries in violation of the Trade Agreement Act ("TAA"), 19 U.S.C. §§ 2501 et seq. Rel.'s Third Am.”
United States Ex Rel. Folliard v. CDW Tech. Servs.., Inc., 722 F. Supp. 2d 20 (D.D.C. 2010). “) Federal agency acquisitions are subject to the requirements of the Trade Agreements Act (“TAA”), 19 U.S.C. § 2501 et seq., and its related regulations, which limit the countries of origin from which federal agencies may purchase supplies.”
United States Ex Rel. Schweizer v. Océ N.V., 677 F.3d 1228 (D.C. Cir. 2012). “The contracts also required Océ to sell to the government only goods made in the United States or other countries designated under the Trade Agreements Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2501 et seq. We refer to these provisions as the price reduction and country-of-origin clauses, respectively.”
Klinge Corp. v. United States, 82 Fed. Cl. 127 (Fed. Cl. 2008). “The contract was subject to the Trade Agreements Act (“TAA”), 19 U.S.C. §§ 2501 et seq. (2000). 48 C.F.”
Off. Depot, Inc. v. United States, 95 Fed. Cl. 517 (Fed. Cl. 2010). “The FDIC manual states that the "Trade Agreements Act (TAA) of 1979 [, 19 U.S.C. § 2501 et seq. (2006),] ... is the statutory authority for many of the trade agreements to which the United States is a party.”
United States Ex Rel. Schweizer v. Océ North Am., Inc., 956 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2013). “These contracts also contained “country-of-origin” clauses, requiring Océ to sell to the government only goods made in the United States or other countries designated under the Trade Agreements Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2501 et seq. Schweizer, 677 F.”
Klinge Corp. v. United States, 83 Fed. Cl. 773 (Fed. Cl. 2008). “We held that Sea Box could not receive the award because the agency’s failure to disqualify it for non-compliance with the Trade Agreements Act (“TAA”), 19 U.S.C. §§ 2501 et seq. (2000), was arbitrary and not in accordance with law.”
Transcom, Inc. v. United States, 121 F. Supp. 2d 690 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2000). “96-39 (codified as 19 U.S.C. § 2501 (1994)). In situations where Congress has not provided clear guidance on an issue, Chevron requires the Court to defer to Commerce’s interpretation of 19 U.”
United States Ex Rel. Folliard v. CDW Tech. Servs., Inc., 722 F. Supp. 2d 37 (D.D.C. 2010). “The gravamen of Folliard’s complaint is that from 2007 to the present, CDW submitted false claims to the government by selling Hewletb-Packard (“HP”) computer products and supplies in contravention of the Trade Agreements Act (“TAA”), 19 U.S.C. §§ 2501 et seq., through the GSA…”
['United States of Am. v. Capitol Supply Inc'], 27 F. Supp. 3d 91 (D.D.C. 2014). “, by falsely certifying that office-grade shredders and other office supplies, which CSI sold to federal agencies via government-sponsored websites, were manufactured in compliance with the Trade Agreements Act (“TAA”), 19 U.S.C. §§ 2501 et seq., and Buy American Act (“BAA”), 41…”
United States ex rel. Sandager v. Dell Mktg., L.P., 872 F. Supp. 2d 801 (D. Minnesota 2012). “One criterion is that the products comply with the Trade Agreements Act of 1979 (“TAA”), 19 U.S.C. § 2501 , et seq., which requires that the products sold to the Government be made or “substantially transformed” in the United States or certain designated countries.”
Blackhawk Indus. Prods. Grp. Unlimited LLC v. United States Gen. Servs. Admin., 348 F. Supp. 2d 649 (E.D. Va. 2004). “Blackhawk asserts that its products are “war materials” and, therefore, exempt from the Trade Agreements Act (“TAA”), 19 U.S.C. § 2501 , et seq. During a hearing conducted on July 26, 2004, the Court Granted Plaintiffs Motion for a Preliminary Injunction.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.