19 U.S.C. § 4084

Articles exempt from relief

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 19 CasesGoogle Scholar

The President may not provide import relief under this part with respect to any article if—(1) import relief previously has been provided under this part with respect to that article; or(2) the article is subject to import relief under—(A) part A; or(B) chapter 1 of title II of the Trade Act of 1974 [19 U.S.C. 2251 et seq.].(Pub. L. 109–53, title III, § 324, Aug. 2, 2005, 119 Stat. 494.)Termination of Section

For termination of section by section 107(d) of Pub. L. 109–53, see Effective and Termination Dates note below.

Editorial NotesReferences in Text

Part A, referred to in par. (2)(A), was in the original “subtitle A”, meaning subtitle A (§§ 311–316) of title III of Pub. L. 109–53, Aug. 2, 2005, 119 Stat. 488, which enacted part A of this subchapter and amended section 2252 of this title. For complete classification of subtitle A to the Code, see Tables.

The Trade Act of 1974, referred to in par. (2)(B), is Pub. L. 93–618, Jan. 3, 1975, 88 Stat. 1978. Chapter 1 of title II of the Act is classified generally to part 1 (§ 2251 et seq.) of subchapter II of chapter 12 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 2101 of this title and Tables.

Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective and Termination Dates

Section effective on the date the Dominican Republic-Central America-United States Free Trade Agreement enters into force (Mar. 1, 2006) and to cease to have effect on the date the Agreement ceases to be in force with respect to the United States, and, during any period in which a country ceases to be a CAFTA–DR country, to cease to have effect with respect to such country, see section 107 of Pub. L. 109–53, set out as a note under section 4001 of this title.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case, 2010–2010 · leading case: Presitex USA Inc. v. United States, 674 F. Supp. 2d 1371 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2010).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Presitex USA Inc. v. United States, 674 F. Supp. 2d 1371 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2010). “Accordingly, Presitex’s 19 U.S.C. § 4084 claim is not ripe for adjudication.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.