19 U.S.C. § 481
Repealed. June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title IV, § 651(a)(1), 46 Stat. 762, eff. June 18, 1930
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 24
cases, 1926–1982 · leading case: Fish v. Brophy, 52 F.2d 198 (S.D.N.Y. 1931).
Fish v. Brophy, 52 F.2d 198 (S.D.N.Y. 1931). “979 (19 USCA § 481). That section provides that such an officer “may at any time go on board of any vessel or vehicle at any place in the United States or within four leagues of the coast of the United States * * to examine the manifest and to inspect, search, and examine the…”
United States v. Coppolo, 2 F. Supp. 115 (D.N.J. 1932). “under the revenue laws a search and seizure, made by proper officers, does not require that they shall have reasonable cause to believe that the law is being violated, but that the right to search and seize without probable cause is justified under the provisions of 19 USCA §…”
The Marion Phillis, 36 F.2d 688 (2d Cir. 1929). “Section 581 (19USCA § 481). According to her clearance papers the Marion Phillis left St.”
United States v. 416 Cases G. T. Whisky, 27 F.2d 738 (2d Cir. 1928). “Such a construction would deny effect to section 581 (19 USCA § 481 note), which authorizes officers of the cus *740 toms or of the Coast Guard to board a vessel within 4 leagues of the coast and to examine the manifest and search the vessel.”
Olson v. United States, 68 F.2d 8 (2d Cir. 1933). “Prior to the Tariff Act of 1922 (section 581 [19 USCA § 481]) the right of seizure had been limited to inbound vessels, but since then the right of search has been extended to include foreign vessels, although not inbound.”
Miller v. United States, 49 F.2d 368 (4th Cir. 1931). “Complaint is made as to the amount of the penalty assessed on account of the unmanifested cargo; but, in addition to the presumption of correctness attaching to the appraisal, there was convincing evidence that same was correct and nothing to the contrary.”
Hoxie v. United States, 15 F.2d 762 (9th Cir. 1926). “The collector retained possession of the books, refused to deliver them to the addressee, Carlson, and turned them over to the United States attorney at Juneau.”
The Newton Bay, 36 F.2d 729 (2d Cir. 1929). “” But if the claim of the appellant prevails, that, because the vessel outdistanced the Gresham while she was in pursuit, and was able to sail beyond the 12-mile limit before capture or before a signal to stop was given, she is beyond the reach of the statute, the purposes of…”
United States v. 5,870 Bags & 100 Kegs, 67 F.2d 333 (2d Cir. 1933). “Thé libel as to the vessel alleged three causes of forfeiture: First, violations of sec^ tions 581, 584, and 594 of the Tariff Act of 1922 (19 USCA §§ 481, 486, 498) and that ■the vessel "was found within twelve miles of the coast with intoxicating liquors for which the master…”
Crowley v. Local No. 82, Furniture & Piano Moving, Furniture Store Drivers, Helpers, Warehousemen, & Packers, 679 F.2d 978 (1st Cir. 1982). “19 U.S.C. § 481 (e) provides in relevant part as follows: (e) In any election required by this section which is to be held by secret ballot a reasonable opportunity shall be given for the nomination of candidates and every member in good standing shall be eligible to be a…”
The Resolution, 30 F.2d 534 (E.D. La. 1929). “979 (19 USCA § 481), which reads: “Officers of the customs or of the Coast Guard, and agents or other persons authorized by the Secretary of the Treasury, or appointed for that purpose in writing by a collector may at any time go on board of any vessel or vehicle at any place in…”
The Pescawha, 45 F.2d 221 (D. Or. 1928). “Section 581 of the Tariff Act of 1922 (19 USCA § 481) authorizes officers of the Coast Guard to at any time go aboard any vessel within four leagues of the coast to examine the manifest and inspect the same, 'and to that end to *223 had and stop such vessel, if under way, and,…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.