2 U.S.C. § 437d

Transferred

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 2 CasesGoogle Scholar

[transferred]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 78 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1975–2021 · leading case: Fed. Election Comm'n v. NRA Political Victory Fund, 513 U.S. 88 (1994).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Fed. Election Comm'n v. NRA Political Victory Fund, 513 U.S. 88 (1994). · cites it 14× “The first provision, 2 U. S. C. § 437d(a)(6), applies to actions under both the FECA and chapters 95 and 96 of Title 26.”

Fed. Election Comm'n v. Nat'l Conservative Political Action Comm., 470 U.S. 480 (1985). · cites it 4× “Compare 2 U. S. C. § 437d(e) and 26 U. S. C. § 9011 (b).”

Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U.S. 1 (1976). · cites it 2× “"Answer: NO "(b) Do 2 U. S. C. §§ 437d and 437g violate such rights, in that they entrust administration and enforcement of the FECA to the Federal Election Commission? .”

Buckley v. Valeo, 519 F.2d 821 (D.C. Cir. 1975). · cites it 9× “Question 8(b) 182 focuses on the broad grant of administrative and enforcement powers in 2 U.S.C. §§ 437d, 437g, while Questions 8(c) through 8(e) 183 deal with specific grants of power to the Commission.”

Fireman v. United States, 44 Fed. Cl. 528 (Fed. Cl. 1999). · cites it 9× “” Here, the Plaintiffs allege that 2 U.S.C. § 437d(e) and 11 C.F.R. § 103.3 (b)(2) are “money mandating.”

Democratic Party of United States v. Nat'l Conservative Political Action Comm., 578 F. Supp. 797 (E.D. Pa. 1983). · cites it 6× “And, whatever may be their power to “implement or construe” the Fund Act through actions brought under section 9011(b), private parties, the PAC defendants say, have no power under that statute or any other to enforce by means of civil injunction the criminal prohibitions of…”

Fed. Election Comm'n v. Comm. to Elect Lyndon La Rouche, 613 F.2d 849 (D.C. Cir. 1980). · cites it 6× “at 1078-80 , a suit to enforce “special orders,” akin to administrative subpoenas, filed in the District of Columbia by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) under Section 112(c)(4) of the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act, 15 U.”

Emily's List v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 581 F.3d 1 (D.C. Cir. 2009). · cites it 2× “The Federal Election Commission (FEC) is an agency within the Executive Branch. *26 The Executive Branch cannot make law, but instead executes laws enacted by the Legislative Branch.”

Fed. Election Comm'n v. Florida for Kennedy Comm., 681 F.2d 1281 (11th Cir. 1982). · cites it 3× “vidence relating to the execution of its duties; (4) in any proceeding or investigation, to order testimony to be taken by deposition before any person who is designated by the Commission and has the power to administer oaths and, in *1289 such instances, to compel testimony and…”

Fieger v. United States Attorney Gen., 542 F.3d 1111 (6th Cir. 2008). · cites it 3× “2 U.S.C. § 437d(a). The Act specifies that “the power of the Commission to initiate civil actions .”

Fed. Election Comm'n v. MacHinists Non-Partisan Political League, 655 F.2d 380 (D.C. Cir. 1981). · cites it 2× “, issue an order requiring compliance^]” 2 U.S.C. § 437d(b). This grant of permissive authority is similar to other statutes which also provide that courts “may” enforce administrative subpoenas.”

Beam v. Gonzales, 548 F. Supp. 2d 596 (N.D. Ill. 2008). · cites it 4× “2 U.S.C. § 437d(a). The Commission may also seek judicial enforcement of its orders in federal district court.”

Show all 78 citing cases →

— 2 U.S.C. § 437d(3) — 1 case

Janvey v. Democratic Senatorial Campaign Comm., Inc., 793 F. Supp. 2d 825 (N.D. Tex. 2011).

— 2 U.S.C. § 437d(7) — 1 case

Teper v. Miller (11th Cir. 1996).

— 2 U.S.C. § 437d(8) — 1 case

Weber v. Heaney, 793 F. Supp. 1438 (D. Minnesota 1992).

— 2 U.S.C. § 437d(a) — 4 cases

Buckley v. Valeo, 519 F.2d 821 (D.C. Cir. 1975). “Question 8(b) 182 focuses on the broad grant of administrative and enforcement powers in 2 U.S.C. §§ 437d, 437g, while Questions 8(c) through 8(e) 183 deal with specific grants of power to the Commission.”

Fieger v. United States Attorney Gen., 542 F.3d 1111 (6th Cir. 2008). “2 U.S.C. § 437d(a). The Act specifies that “the power of the Commission to initiate civil actions .”

Beam v. Gonzales, 548 F. Supp. 2d 596 (N.D. Ill. 2008). “2 U.S.C. § 437d(a). The Commission may also seek judicial enforcement of its orders in federal district court.”

Geoffrey Fieger v. US Attorney Gen. (6th Cir. 2008).

— 2 U.S.C. § 437d(a)(1) — 2 cases

Fed. Election Comm'n v. Comm. to Elect Lyndon La Rouche, 613 F.2d 849 (D.C. Cir. 1980). “at 1078-80 , a suit to enforce “special orders,” akin to administrative subpoenas, filed in the District of Columbia by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) under Section 112(c)(4) of the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act, 15 U.”

Fed. Election Comm'n v. Wright, 777 F. Supp. 525 (N.D. Tex. 1991).

— 2 U.S.C. § 437d(a)(10) — 1 case

Fed. Election Comm'n v. Citizens for Freeman, 602 F. Supp. 1250 (D. Maryland 1985).

— 2 U.S.C. § 437d(a)(3) — 5 cases

Fed. Election Comm'n v. Florida for Kennedy Comm., 681 F.2d 1281 (11th Cir. 1982). “vidence relating to the execution of its duties; (4) in any proceeding or investigation, to order testimony to be taken by deposition before any person who is designated by the Commission and has the power to administer oaths and, in *1289 such instances, to compel testimony and…”

Fed. Election Comm'n v. Citizens for Freeman, 602 F. Supp. 1250 (D. Maryland 1985).

Fed. Election Comm'n v. Florida for Kennedy Comm., 492 F. Supp. 587 (S.D. Fla. 1980).

Fed. Election Comm'n v. Automated Bus. Servs., 888 F. Supp. 539 (S.D.N.Y. 1995).

— 2 U.S.C. § 437d(a)(6) — 10 cases

Fed. Election Comm'n v. NRA Political Victory Fund, 513 U.S. 88 (1994). “The first provision, 2 U. S. C. § 437d(a)(6), applies to actions under both the FECA and chapters 95 and 96 of Title 26.”

Democratic Party of United States v. Nat'l Conservative Political Action Comm., 578 F. Supp. 797 (E.D. Pa. 1983). “And, whatever may be their power to “implement or construe” the Fund Act through actions brought under section 9011(b), private parties, the PAC defendants say, have no power under that statute or any other to enforce by means of civil injunction the criminal prohibitions of…”

Fed. Election Comm'n v. Christian Action Network, 894 F. Supp. 946 (W.D. Va. 1995).

Marion G. Robertson & Americans for Robertson, Inc. v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 45 F.3d 486 (D.C. Cir. 1995).

Walther v. Baucus, 467 F. Supp. 93 (D. Mont. 1979).

— 2 U.S.C. § 437d(a)(7) — 5 cases

Cao v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 688 F. Supp. 2d 498 (E.D. La. 2010).

Bialek v. Mukasey, 529 F.3d 1267 (10th Cir. 2008).

Weber v. Heaney, 793 F. Supp. 1438 (D. Minnesota 1992).

Teper v. Miller, 82 F.3d 989 (11th Cir. 1996).

Weber v. Heaney, 995 F.2d 872 (8th Cir. 1993).

— 2 U.S.C. § 437d(a)(8) — 14 cases

Emily's List v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 581 F.3d 1 (D.C. Cir. 2009). “The Federal Election Commission (FEC) is an agency within the Executive Branch. *26 The Executive Branch cannot make law, but instead executes laws enacted by the Legislative Branch.”

Shays v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 337 F. Supp. 2d 28 (D.D.C. 2004).

Ctr. for Individual Freedom v. Van Hollen, 694 F.3d 108 (D.C. Cir. 2012).

Robin Clifton & Maine Right to Life Comm., Inc. v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 114 F.3d 1309 (1st Cir. 1997).

— 2 U.S.C. § 437d(a)(9) — 7 cases

Rose v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 608 F. Supp. 1 (D.D.C. 1985).

Fed. Election Comm'n v. Larry R. Williams, 104 F.3d 237 (9th Cir. 1996).

Spannaus v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 641 F. Supp. 1520 (S.D.N.Y. 1986).

Jud. Watch, Inc. v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 293 F. Supp. 2d 41 (D.D.C. 2003).

Fed. Election Comm'n v. Automated Bus. Servs., 888 F. Supp. 539 (S.D.N.Y. 1995).

— 2 U.S.C. § 437d(a)(l) — 8 cases

In re Sealed Case, 237 F.3d 657 (D.C. Cir. 2001).

Am. Fed'n of Labor & Cong. of Indus. Organizations v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 333 F.3d 168 (D.C. Cir. 2003).

Fed. Election Comm'n v. The Larouche Campaign, 817 F.2d 233 (2d Cir. 1987).

Fed. Election Comm'n v. Larouche Campaign, Inc., 644 F. Supp. 120 (S.D.N.Y. 1986).

— 2 U.S.C. § 437d(b) — 13 cases

Fed. Election Comm'n v. MacHinists Non-Partisan Political League, 655 F.2d 380 (D.C. Cir. 1981). “, issue an order requiring compliance^]” 2 U.S.C. § 437d(b). This grant of permissive authority is similar to other statutes which also provide that courts “may” enforce administrative subpoenas.”

U.S. Int'l Trade Comm'n v. ASAT, Inc., 411 F.3d 245 (D.C. Cir. 2005).

Beam v. Gonzales, 548 F. Supp. 2d 596 (N.D. Ill. 2008). “2 U.S.C. § 437d(a). The Commission may also seek judicial enforcement of its orders in federal district court.”

United States v. Tesoro Petroleum Corp., 503 F. Supp. 868 (D.D.C. 1980).

— 2 U.S.C. § 437d(c) — 1 case

Pub. Off. Corp.,appellants v. Clinton for President Comm.,appellees, 194 F.3d 139 (D.C. Cir. 1999).

— 2 U.S.C. § 437d(d) — 2 cases

Rose v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 608 F. Supp. 1 (D.D.C. 1985).

Constitutionality of the Direct Reporting Requirement in Section 802(e)(1) of the Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11 Comm'n Act of 2007 (OLC 2008).

— 2 U.S.C. § 437d(e) — 21 cases

Fed. Election Comm'n v. Nat'l Conservative Political Action Comm., 470 U.S. 480 (1985). “Compare 2 U. S. C. § 437d(e) and 26 U. S. C. § 9011 (b).”

Fireman v. United States, 44 Fed. Cl. 528 (Fed. Cl. 1999). “” Here, the Plaintiffs allege that 2 U.S.C. § 437d(e) and 11 C.F.R. § 103.3 (b)(2) are “money mandating.”

Fieger v. United States Attorney Gen., 542 F.3d 1111 (6th Cir. 2008). “2 U.S.C. § 437d(a). The Act specifies that “the power of the Commission to initiate civil actions .”

Martini v. Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'n, 178 F.3d 1336 (D.C. Cir. 1999).

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.