2 U.S.C. § 441c
Transferred
[transferred]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 17
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1978–2024 · leading case: Bd. of Comm'rs, Wabaunsee Cty. v. Umbehr, 518 U.S. 668 (1996).
Bd. of Comm'rs, Wabaunsee Cty. v. Umbehr, 518 U.S. 668 (1996). “The United States Code contains a categorical statutory prohibition on political contributions by those negotiating for or performing contracts with the Federal Government, 2 U. S. C. § 441c, competitive bidding requirements for contracts with executive agencies, 41 U.”
Ognibene v. Parkes, 671 F.3d 174 (2d Cir. 2011). “Federal law has long prohibited government contractors from making contributions to “any political party, committee, or candidate for public office or to any person for any political purpose or use” while these contractors are seeking or performing pursuant to a contract.”
Martin v. Commonwealth, 96 S.W.3d 38 (Ky. 2003). “§ 441b(a) makes it unlawful "knowingly to accept or receive" a contribution from a national bank, corporation, or labor organization, and that 2 U.S.C. § 441c(a)(2) makes it unlawful "knowingly to solicit" a contribution from a government contractor.”
Wendy Wagner v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 793 F.3d 1 (D.C. Cir. 2015). “Wade and the contracting corporation later agreed to pay a $ 1 million civil penalty for violating, inter alia, § 30119 (then 2 U.S.C. § 441c). Conciliation Agreement at 6-7, In re MZM, Inc.”
Jimmy Yamada v. William Snipes, 786 F.3d 1182 (9th Cir. 2015). “See 2 U.S.C. § 441c. Hawaii's law does not prohibit A-l from making contributions as a prospective contractor, A-l’s principals (such as plaintiff Yamada) from making contributions or A-l from making independent expenditures on behalf of the candidates it seeks to support.”
Wagner v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 854 F. Supp. 2d 83 (D.D.C. 2012). “See 2 U.S.C. §§ 441c(a)-(b).) In considering this issue, the Court is mindful that closely drawn scrutiny is a “relatively complaisant [standard of] review under the First Amendment.”
Wagner v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 901 F. Supp. 2d 101 (D.D.C. 2012). “Under 2 U.S.C. § 441c, entitled “Contributions by government contractors,” no one who contracts with the Federal Government may contribute, directly or indirectly, to any political party, committee, or candidate for public office, or to any person for any political purpose or…”
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Weinsten, 462 F. Supp. 243 (S.D.N.Y. 1978). “§ 610 ; (b) made an illegal political contribution as a government contractor, in violation of 2 U.S.C. § 441c and its predecessor 18 U.”
Green Party of Connecticut v. Garfield, 590 F. Supp. 2d 288 (D. Conn. 2008). “The fact that Connecticut’s ban on contributions from state contractors is more far-reaching than the bans enacted by other states does not render it less constitutionally valid. Given the strong incentive for lobbyists and state contractors to gain the favor of state officials…”
Janvey v. Democratic Senatorial Campaign Comm., Inc., 793 F. Supp. 2d 825 (N.D. Tex. 2011). “2 U.S.C. § 441c. 34 . 2 U.S.C. § 441e. 35 .”
Ognibene v. Parkes (2d Cir. 2011). “Federal law has long prohibited government contractors from making contributions to “any political party, committee, or candidate for public office or to any person for any political purpose or use” while these contractors are seeking or performing pursuant to a contract.”
Ognibene v. Parkes (2d Cir. 2012). “Federal law has long prohibited government contractors from making contributions to “any political party, committee, or candidate for public office or to any person for any political purpose or use” while these contractors are seeking or performing pursuant to a contract.”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441c(a) — 2 cases
Wagner v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 854 F. Supp. 2d 83 (D.D.C. 2012). “See 2 U.S.C. §§ 441c(a)-(b).) In considering this issue, the Court is mindful that closely drawn scrutiny is a “relatively complaisant [standard of] review under the First Amendment.”
Wagner v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 901 F. Supp. 2d 101 (D.D.C. 2012). “Under 2 U.S.C. § 441c, entitled “Contributions by government contractors,” no one who contracts with the Federal Government may contribute, directly or indirectly, to any political party, committee, or candidate for public office, or to any person for any political purpose or…”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441c(a)(1) — 2 cases
— 2 U.S.C. § 441c(a)(2) — 1 case
Martin v. Commonwealth, 96 S.W.3d 38 (Ky. 2003). “§ 441b(a) makes it unlawful "knowingly to accept or receive" a contribution from a national bank, corporation, or labor organization, and that 2 U.S.C. § 441c(a)(2) makes it unlawful "knowingly to solicit" a contribution from a government contractor.”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441c(a)(l) — 2 cases
Wagner v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 854 F. Supp. 2d 83 (D.D.C. 2012). “See 2 U.S.C. §§ 441c(a)-(b).) In considering this issue, the Court is mindful that closely drawn scrutiny is a “relatively complaisant [standard of] review under the First Amendment.”
Wagner v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 901 F. Supp. 2d 101 (D.D.C. 2012). “Under 2 U.S.C. § 441c, entitled “Contributions by government contractors,” no one who contracts with the Federal Government may contribute, directly or indirectly, to any political party, committee, or candidate for public office, or to any person for any political purpose or…”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441c(b) — 1 case
Wagner v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 901 F. Supp. 2d 101 (D.D.C. 2012). “Under 2 U.S.C. § 441c, entitled “Contributions by government contractors,” no one who contracts with the Federal Government may contribute, directly or indirectly, to any political party, committee, or candidate for public office, or to any person for any political purpose or…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.