2 U.S.C. § 441f
Transferred
[transferred]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 46
cases, 1978–2018 · leading case: United States v. O'Donnell, 608 F.3d 546 (9th Cir. 2010).
United States v. O'Donnell, 608 F.3d 546 (9th Cir. 2010). “” 2 U.S.C. § 441f. We hold that this law prohibits a person from providing money to others to donate to a candidate for federal office in their own names, when in reality they are merely “straw donors.”
United States v. Boender, 649 F.3d 650 (7th Cir. 2011). “§ 666 and his misdemeanor conviction under 2 U.S.C. § 441f. He also challenges his conviction under 18 U.”
United States v. F. Whittemore, 776 F.3d 1074 (9th Cir. 2015). “§§ 441a(a)(l) and 437g(d)(l)(A)(i), making contributions in the name of another in violation of 2 U.S.C. §§ 441f and 437g(d)(l)(A)(i), and making a false statement to a federal agency in violation of 18 U.”
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “" 2 U.S.C. § 441f. And an FEC regulation that remained in effect until January 1, 2003 ensured that a minor child could make a contribution only if he did so *425 "knowingly and voluntarily," with "funds, goods, or services .”
United States v. Danielczyk, 788 F. Supp. 2d 472 (E.D. Va. 2011). “§ 371 , Counts Two and Three charge making campaign contributions in the name of another in violation of 2 U.S.C. § 441f and 18 U.S.C. § 2 , Count Four charges corporate contributions in violation of 2 U.”
Mariani v. United States, 80 F. Supp. 2d 352 (M.D. Penn. 1999). “§ 441b (the “corporate contribution ban”), and prohibit making campaign contributions in the name of another person, 2 U.S.C. § 441f (the “conduit contribution ban”).”
United States v. Hankin, Perch, Perch P. Hankin, 607 F.2d 611 (3rd Cir. 1979). “The savings provision maintained the vitality of the repealed act until the effective date of the recodification, 2 U.S.C. § 441f (1976). . Defendant also raises the issues of improper venue and the overbreadth of 18 U.”
United States v. Hsia, 24 F. Supp. 2d 33 (D.D.C. 1998). “§ 441a; that “[n]o person shall make a contribution in the name of another person or knowingly permit his name to be used to effect such a contribution,” 2 U.S.C. § 441f; and that it is unlawful for “any corporation whatever .”
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Weinsten, 462 F. Supp. 243 (S.D.N.Y. 1978). “§ 611 ; and (c) illegally made contributions in the names of others, in violation of 2 U.S.C. § 441f and its predecessor 18 U.”
Michael R. Goland v. United States of Am., & Fed. Election Comm'n, Intervenor-Appellee, 903 F.2d 1247 (9th Cir. 1990). “” 2 U.S.C. § 441f. FACTS Alan Cranston (Democrat), Ed Zschau (Republican), and Ed Vallen (American Independent Party) ran in the 1986 California election for the United States Senate.”
United States v. Hsu, 669 F.3d 112 (2d Cir. 2012). “§ 1343 ; and (3) campaign finance fraud, in violation of 2 U.S.C. §§ 441f and 437g(d)(l)(A). On May 7, 2009, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Victor Marrero, /.”
UNITED STATES of Am., v. Frank SERAFINI; United States of Am., v. Frank Serafini, 233 F.3d 758 (3rd Cir. 2000). “See 2 U.S.C. § 441f (“No person shall make a contribution in the name of another person or knowingly permit his name to be used to effect such a contribution.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.