2 U.S.C. § 441i
Transferred
[transferred]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 20
cases, 1991–2015 · leading case: McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003).
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “See BCRA § 101(a); FECA § 323(a); 2 U.S.C. § 441i(a) (barring officers of agents of national political party committees from soliciting or directing contributions "that are not subject to the limitations, prohibitions, and reporting requirements of this Act.”
Shays v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 337 F. Supp. 2d 28 (D.D.C. 2004). ““The remaining provisions of [2 U.S.C. § 441i] largely reinforce the restrictions of’ 2 U.”
Shays v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 414 F.3d 76 (D.C. Cir. 2005). “See 2 U.S.C. §§ 441i(a), (b)(2)(B)(iv), (e); McConnell, 540 U.”
Shays v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 528 F.3d 914 (D.C. Cir. 2008). “2 U.S.C. § 441i(a). Relevant here, the Act required the FEC to develop a new test for determining what advertisements count as “coordinated communications,” BCRA § 214(c), 116 Stat.”
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 540 U.S. 93 (2003). “2 U.S.C.A. § 441i (Supp. 2003). Section 323(f), too, is not narrowly tailored or even close to it.”
Democratic Nat'l Comm. v. Repub. Nat'l Comm., 673 F.3d 192 (3rd Cir. 2012). “*211 The RNC argues that the BCRA’s prohibition on the spending of soft money by state parties for voter registration and get-out-the-vote activity has heightened the risk of voter fraud because it is difficult to track the voter registration efforts of the increased number of…”
Libertarian Nat'l Comm., Inc. v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 930 F. Supp. 2d 154 (D.D.C. 2013). “2 U.S.C. § 441i. 16. The contribution limits applicable to the LNC set forth in Section 441a(a)(l) are indexed for inflation.”
McCutcheon v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 134 S. Ct. 1434 (2014). “So-called "Levin funds" are donations permissible under state law that may be spent on certain federal election activity-namely, voter registration and identification, get-out-the-vote efforts, or generic campaign activities.”
Janvey v. Democratic Senatorial Campaign Comm., Inc., 793 F. Supp. 2d 825 (N.D. Tex. 2011). “Congress placed the bulk of BCRA’s soft money provisions in FECA section 323, eventually codified in 2 U.S.C. § 441i. 47 “Complex as its provisions may be, § 323, in the main, does little more than regulate the ability of wealthy individuals, corporations, and unions to…”
Shays v. United States Fed. Election Comm'n, 508 F. Supp. 2d 10 (D.D.C. 2007). “The Supreme Court specifically noted that 2 U.S.C. §§ 441i(3)(l)(B) and 441i(e)(3) “preserve the traditional role of federal officeholders by providing limited opportunities for federal candidates and officeholders to associate with their state and local colleagues through joint…”
Repub. Nat'l Comm. v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 698 F. Supp. 2d 150 (D.D.C. 2010). “2 U.S.C. § 441i(a); see id. § 441a(a)(l)(B); Price Index Increases for Contribution and Expenditure Limitations and Lobbyist Bundling Disclosure Threshold, 74 Fed.”
Rufer v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 64 F. Supp. 3d 195 (D.D.C. 2014). “C §§ 441i(a), (b)(1), (c), added a new section to FECA (section 323) prohibiting national, state, and local party committees from soliciting, receiving, spending, or disbursing money not raised in compliance with the base contribution limits found at subsections 441a(a)(l)(B)…”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441i(3)(l)(B) — 1 case
Shays v. United States Fed. Election Comm'n, 508 F. Supp. 2d 10 (D.D.C. 2007). “The Supreme Court specifically noted that 2 U.S.C. §§ 441i(3)(l)(B) and 441i(e)(3) “preserve the traditional role of federal officeholders by providing limited opportunities for federal candidates and officeholders to associate with their state and local colleagues through joint…”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441i(a) — 13 cases
Shays v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 337 F. Supp. 2d 28 (D.D.C. 2004). ““The remaining provisions of [2 U.S.C. § 441i] largely reinforce the restrictions of’ 2 U.”
Democratic Nat'l Comm. v. Repub. Nat'l Comm., 673 F.3d 192 (3rd Cir. 2012). “*211 The RNC argues that the BCRA’s prohibition on the spending of soft money by state parties for voter registration and get-out-the-vote activity has heightened the risk of voter fraud because it is difficult to track the voter registration efforts of the increased number of…”
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “See BCRA § 101(a); FECA § 323(a); 2 U.S.C. § 441i(a) (barring officers of agents of national political party committees from soliciting or directing contributions "that are not subject to the limitations, prohibitions, and reporting requirements of this Act.”
Rufer v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 64 F. Supp. 3d 195 (D.D.C. 2014). “C §§ 441i(a), (b)(1), (c), added a new section to FECA (section 323) prohibiting national, state, and local party committees from soliciting, receiving, spending, or disbursing money not raised in compliance with the base contribution limits found at subsections 441a(a)(l)(B)…”
Shays v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 414 F.3d 76 (D.C. Cir. 2005). “See 2 U.S.C. §§ 441i(a), (b)(2)(B)(iv), (e); McConnell, 540 U.”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441i(a)(1) — 3 cases
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “See BCRA § 101(a); FECA § 323(a); 2 U.S.C. § 441i(a) (barring officers of agents of national political party committees from soliciting or directing contributions "that are not subject to the limitations, prohibitions, and reporting requirements of this Act.”
Shays v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 337 F. Supp. 2d 28 (D.D.C. 2004). ““The remaining provisions of [2 U.S.C. § 441i] largely reinforce the restrictions of’ 2 U.”
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 540 U.S. 93 (2003). “2 U.S.C.A. § 441i (Supp. 2003). Section 323(f), too, is not narrowly tailored or even close to it.”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441i(a)(2) — 4 cases
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “See BCRA § 101(a); FECA § 323(a); 2 U.S.C. § 441i(a) (barring officers of agents of national political party committees from soliciting or directing contributions "that are not subject to the limitations, prohibitions, and reporting requirements of this Act.”
Shays v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 337 F. Supp. 2d 28 (D.D.C. 2004). ““The remaining provisions of [2 U.S.C. § 441i] largely reinforce the restrictions of’ 2 U.”
Shays v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 414 F.3d 76 (D.C. Cir. 2005). “See 2 U.S.C. §§ 441i(a), (b)(2)(B)(iv), (e); McConnell, 540 U.”
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 540 U.S. 93 (2003). “2 U.S.C.A. § 441i (Supp. 2003). Section 323(f), too, is not narrowly tailored or even close to it.”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441i(a)(l) — 5 cases
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “See BCRA § 101(a); FECA § 323(a); 2 U.S.C. § 441i(a) (barring officers of agents of national political party committees from soliciting or directing contributions "that are not subject to the limitations, prohibitions, and reporting requirements of this Act.”
Shays v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 414 F.3d 76 (D.C. Cir. 2005). “See 2 U.S.C. §§ 441i(a), (b)(2)(B)(iv), (e); McConnell, 540 U.”
Libertarian Nat'l Comm., Inc. v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 930 F. Supp. 2d 154 (D.D.C. 2013). “2 U.S.C. § 441i. 16. The contribution limits applicable to the LNC set forth in Section 441a(a)(l) are indexed for inflation.”
Democratic Nat'l Comm. v. Repub. Nat'l Comm., 671 F. Supp. 2d 575 (D.N.J. 2009).
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 540 U.S. 93 (2003). “2 U.S.C.A. § 441i (Supp. 2003). Section 323(f), too, is not narrowly tailored or even close to it.”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441i(b) — 7 cases
Shays v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 414 F.3d 76 (D.C. Cir. 2005). “See 2 U.S.C. §§ 441i(a), (b)(2)(B)(iv), (e); McConnell, 540 U.”
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “See BCRA § 101(a); FECA § 323(a); 2 U.S.C. § 441i(a) (barring officers of agents of national political party committees from soliciting or directing contributions "that are not subject to the limitations, prohibitions, and reporting requirements of this Act.”
McCutcheon v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 134 S. Ct. 1434 (2014). “So-called "Levin funds" are donations permissible under state law that may be spent on certain federal election activity-namely, voter registration and identification, get-out-the-vote efforts, or generic campaign activities.”
Repub. Nat'l Comm. v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 698 F. Supp. 2d 150 (D.D.C. 2010). “2 U.S.C. § 441i(a); see id. § 441a(a)(l)(B); Price Index Increases for Contribution and Expenditure Limitations and Lobbyist Bundling Disclosure Threshold, 74 Fed.”
Shays v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 337 F. Supp. 2d 28 (D.D.C. 2004). ““The remaining provisions of [2 U.S.C. § 441i] largely reinforce the restrictions of’ 2 U.”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441i(b)(1) — 3 cases
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “See BCRA § 101(a); FECA § 323(a); 2 U.S.C. § 441i(a) (barring officers of agents of national political party committees from soliciting or directing contributions "that are not subject to the limitations, prohibitions, and reporting requirements of this Act.”
Shays v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 337 F. Supp. 2d 28 (D.D.C. 2004). ““The remaining provisions of [2 U.S.C. § 441i] largely reinforce the restrictions of’ 2 U.”
Democratic Nat'l Comm. v. Repub. Nat'l Comm., 673 F.3d 192 (3rd Cir. 2012). “*211 The RNC argues that the BCRA’s prohibition on the spending of soft money by state parties for voter registration and get-out-the-vote activity has heightened the risk of voter fraud because it is difficult to track the voter registration efforts of the increased number of…”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441i(b)(2) — 8 cases
Shays v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 337 F. Supp. 2d 28 (D.D.C. 2004). ““The remaining provisions of [2 U.S.C. § 441i] largely reinforce the restrictions of’ 2 U.”
Shays v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 414 F.3d 76 (D.C. Cir. 2005). “See 2 U.S.C. §§ 441i(a), (b)(2)(B)(iv), (e); McConnell, 540 U.”
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “See BCRA § 101(a); FECA § 323(a); 2 U.S.C. § 441i(a) (barring officers of agents of national political party committees from soliciting or directing contributions "that are not subject to the limitations, prohibitions, and reporting requirements of this Act.”
Shays v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 528 F.3d 914 (D.C. Cir. 2008). “2 U.S.C. § 441i(a). Relevant here, the Act required the FEC to develop a new test for determining what advertisements count as “coordinated communications,” BCRA § 214(c), 116 Stat.”
Shays v. United States Fed. Election Comm'n, 508 F. Supp. 2d 10 (D.D.C. 2007). “The Supreme Court specifically noted that 2 U.S.C. §§ 441i(3)(l)(B) and 441i(e)(3) “preserve the traditional role of federal officeholders by providing limited opportunities for federal candidates and officeholders to associate with their state and local colleagues through joint…”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441i(b)(2)(A) — 3 cases
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “See BCRA § 101(a); FECA § 323(a); 2 U.S.C. § 441i(a) (barring officers of agents of national political party committees from soliciting or directing contributions "that are not subject to the limitations, prohibitions, and reporting requirements of this Act.”
Shays v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 414 F.3d 76 (D.C. Cir. 2005). “See 2 U.S.C. §§ 441i(a), (b)(2)(B)(iv), (e); McConnell, 540 U.”
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 540 U.S. 93 (2003). “2 U.S.C.A. § 441i (Supp. 2003). Section 323(f), too, is not narrowly tailored or even close to it.”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441i(b)(2)(A)(i) — 1 case
Shays v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 337 F. Supp. 2d 28 (D.D.C. 2004). ““The remaining provisions of [2 U.S.C. § 441i] largely reinforce the restrictions of’ 2 U.”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441i(b)(2)(B) — 1 case
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “See BCRA § 101(a); FECA § 323(a); 2 U.S.C. § 441i(a) (barring officers of agents of national political party committees from soliciting or directing contributions "that are not subject to the limitations, prohibitions, and reporting requirements of this Act.”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441i(b)(2)(B)(i) — 1 case
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 540 U.S. 93 (2003). “2 U.S.C.A. § 441i (Supp. 2003). Section 323(f), too, is not narrowly tailored or even close to it.”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441i(b)(2)(B)(iHii) — 1 case
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 540 U.S. 93 (2003). “2 U.S.C.A. § 441i (Supp. 2003). Section 323(f), too, is not narrowly tailored or even close to it.”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441i(b)(2)(B)(ii) — 1 case
Shays v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 414 F.3d 76 (D.C. Cir. 2005). “See 2 U.S.C. §§ 441i(a), (b)(2)(B)(iv), (e); McConnell, 540 U.”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441i(b)(2)(B)(iv) — 2 cases
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “See BCRA § 101(a); FECA § 323(a); 2 U.S.C. § 441i(a) (barring officers of agents of national political party committees from soliciting or directing contributions "that are not subject to the limitations, prohibitions, and reporting requirements of this Act.”
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 540 U.S. 93 (2003). “2 U.S.C.A. § 441i (Supp. 2003). Section 323(f), too, is not narrowly tailored or even close to it.”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441i(b)(l) — 4 cases
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “See BCRA § 101(a); FECA § 323(a); 2 U.S.C. § 441i(a) (barring officers of agents of national political party committees from soliciting or directing contributions "that are not subject to the limitations, prohibitions, and reporting requirements of this Act.”
Shays v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 528 F.3d 914 (D.C. Cir. 2008). “2 U.S.C. § 441i(a). Relevant here, the Act required the FEC to develop a new test for determining what advertisements count as “coordinated communications,” BCRA § 214(c), 116 Stat.”
Shays v. United States Fed. Election Comm'n, 508 F. Supp. 2d 10 (D.D.C. 2007). “The Supreme Court specifically noted that 2 U.S.C. §§ 441i(3)(l)(B) and 441i(e)(3) “preserve the traditional role of federal officeholders by providing limited opportunities for federal candidates and officeholders to associate with their state and local colleagues through joint…”
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 540 U.S. 93 (2003). “2 U.S.C.A. § 441i (Supp. 2003). Section 323(f), too, is not narrowly tailored or even close to it.”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441i(c) — 2 cases
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “See BCRA § 101(a); FECA § 323(a); 2 U.S.C. § 441i(a) (barring officers of agents of national political party committees from soliciting or directing contributions "that are not subject to the limitations, prohibitions, and reporting requirements of this Act.”
Shays v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 337 F. Supp. 2d 28 (D.D.C. 2004). ““The remaining provisions of [2 U.S.C. § 441i] largely reinforce the restrictions of’ 2 U.”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441i(d) — 4 cases
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “See BCRA § 101(a); FECA § 323(a); 2 U.S.C. § 441i(a) (barring officers of agents of national political party committees from soliciting or directing contributions "that are not subject to the limitations, prohibitions, and reporting requirements of this Act.”
Shays v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 337 F. Supp. 2d 28 (D.D.C. 2004). ““The remaining provisions of [2 U.S.C. § 441i] largely reinforce the restrictions of’ 2 U.”
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 540 U.S. 93 (2003). “2 U.S.C.A. § 441i (Supp. 2003). Section 323(f), too, is not narrowly tailored or even close to it.”
Janvey v. Democratic Senatorial Campaign Comm., Inc., 793 F. Supp. 2d 825 (N.D. Tex. 2011). “Congress placed the bulk of BCRA’s soft money provisions in FECA section 323, eventually codified in 2 U.S.C. § 441i. 47 “Complex as its provisions may be, § 323, in the main, does little more than regulate the ability of wealthy individuals, corporations, and unions to…”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441i(d)(1) — 1 case
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “See BCRA § 101(a); FECA § 323(a); 2 U.S.C. § 441i(a) (barring officers of agents of national political party committees from soliciting or directing contributions "that are not subject to the limitations, prohibitions, and reporting requirements of this Act.”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441i(d)(2) — 1 case
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “See BCRA § 101(a); FECA § 323(a); 2 U.S.C. § 441i(a) (barring officers of agents of national political party committees from soliciting or directing contributions "that are not subject to the limitations, prohibitions, and reporting requirements of this Act.”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441i(d)(l) — 2 cases
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “See BCRA § 101(a); FECA § 323(a); 2 U.S.C. § 441i(a) (barring officers of agents of national political party committees from soliciting or directing contributions "that are not subject to the limitations, prohibitions, and reporting requirements of this Act.”
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 540 U.S. 93 (2003). “2 U.S.C.A. § 441i (Supp. 2003). Section 323(f), too, is not narrowly tailored or even close to it.”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441i(e) — 5 cases
Shays v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 337 F. Supp. 2d 28 (D.D.C. 2004). ““The remaining provisions of [2 U.S.C. § 441i] largely reinforce the restrictions of’ 2 U.”
Siefert v. Alexander, 608 F.3d 974 (7th Cir. 2010).
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 540 U.S. 93 (2003). “2 U.S.C.A. § 441i (Supp. 2003). Section 323(f), too, is not narrowly tailored or even close to it.”
Janvey v. Democratic Senatorial Campaign Comm., Inc., 793 F. Supp. 2d 825 (N.D. Tex. 2011). “Congress placed the bulk of BCRA’s soft money provisions in FECA section 323, eventually codified in 2 U.S.C. § 441i. 47 “Complex as its provisions may be, § 323, in the main, does little more than regulate the ability of wealthy individuals, corporations, and unions to…”
Shays v. United States Fed. Election Comm'n, 508 F. Supp. 2d 10 (D.D.C. 2007). “The Supreme Court specifically noted that 2 U.S.C. §§ 441i(3)(l)(B) and 441i(e)(3) “preserve the traditional role of federal officeholders by providing limited opportunities for federal candidates and officeholders to associate with their state and local colleagues through joint…”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441i(e)(1) — 2 cases
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “See BCRA § 101(a); FECA § 323(a); 2 U.S.C. § 441i(a) (barring officers of agents of national political party committees from soliciting or directing contributions "that are not subject to the limitations, prohibitions, and reporting requirements of this Act.”
Shays v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 337 F. Supp. 2d 28 (D.D.C. 2004). ““The remaining provisions of [2 U.S.C. § 441i] largely reinforce the restrictions of’ 2 U.”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441i(e)(1)(A) — 1 case
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “See BCRA § 101(a); FECA § 323(a); 2 U.S.C. § 441i(a) (barring officers of agents of national political party committees from soliciting or directing contributions "that are not subject to the limitations, prohibitions, and reporting requirements of this Act.”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441i(e)(1)(B) — 1 case
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 540 U.S. 93 (2003). “2 U.S.C.A. § 441i (Supp. 2003). Section 323(f), too, is not narrowly tailored or even close to it.”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441i(e)(1)(B)(i) — 1 case
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “See BCRA § 101(a); FECA § 323(a); 2 U.S.C. § 441i(a) (barring officers of agents of national political party committees from soliciting or directing contributions "that are not subject to the limitations, prohibitions, and reporting requirements of this Act.”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441i(e)(2) — 4 cases
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “See BCRA § 101(a); FECA § 323(a); 2 U.S.C. § 441i(a) (barring officers of agents of national political party committees from soliciting or directing contributions "that are not subject to the limitations, prohibitions, and reporting requirements of this Act.”
Shays v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 528 F.3d 914 (D.C. Cir. 2008). “2 U.S.C. § 441i(a). Relevant here, the Act required the FEC to develop a new test for determining what advertisements count as “coordinated communications,” BCRA § 214(c), 116 Stat.”
Shays v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 337 F. Supp. 2d 28 (D.D.C. 2004). ““The remaining provisions of [2 U.S.C. § 441i] largely reinforce the restrictions of’ 2 U.”
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 540 U.S. 93 (2003). “2 U.S.C.A. § 441i (Supp. 2003). Section 323(f), too, is not narrowly tailored or even close to it.”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441i(e)(3) — 3 cases
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “See BCRA § 101(a); FECA § 323(a); 2 U.S.C. § 441i(a) (barring officers of agents of national political party committees from soliciting or directing contributions "that are not subject to the limitations, prohibitions, and reporting requirements of this Act.”
Shays v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 337 F. Supp. 2d 28 (D.D.C. 2004). ““The remaining provisions of [2 U.S.C. § 441i] largely reinforce the restrictions of’ 2 U.”
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 540 U.S. 93 (2003). “2 U.S.C.A. § 441i (Supp. 2003). Section 323(f), too, is not narrowly tailored or even close to it.”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441i(e)(4) — 2 cases
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “See BCRA § 101(a); FECA § 323(a); 2 U.S.C. § 441i(a) (barring officers of agents of national political party committees from soliciting or directing contributions "that are not subject to the limitations, prohibitions, and reporting requirements of this Act.”
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 540 U.S. 93 (2003). “2 U.S.C.A. § 441i (Supp. 2003). Section 323(f), too, is not narrowly tailored or even close to it.”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441i(e)(4)(A) — 2 cases
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “See BCRA § 101(a); FECA § 323(a); 2 U.S.C. § 441i(a) (barring officers of agents of national political party committees from soliciting or directing contributions "that are not subject to the limitations, prohibitions, and reporting requirements of this Act.”
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 540 U.S. 93 (2003). “2 U.S.C.A. § 441i (Supp. 2003). Section 323(f), too, is not narrowly tailored or even close to it.”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441i(e)(4)(B) — 2 cases
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “See BCRA § 101(a); FECA § 323(a); 2 U.S.C. § 441i(a) (barring officers of agents of national political party committees from soliciting or directing contributions "that are not subject to the limitations, prohibitions, and reporting requirements of this Act.”
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 540 U.S. 93 (2003). “2 U.S.C.A. § 441i (Supp. 2003). Section 323(f), too, is not narrowly tailored or even close to it.”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441i(e)(4)(B)(i) — 1 case
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “See BCRA § 101(a); FECA § 323(a); 2 U.S.C. § 441i(a) (barring officers of agents of national political party committees from soliciting or directing contributions "that are not subject to the limitations, prohibitions, and reporting requirements of this Act.”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441i(e)(l) — 1 case
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “See BCRA § 101(a); FECA § 323(a); 2 U.S.C. § 441i(a) (barring officers of agents of national political party committees from soliciting or directing contributions "that are not subject to the limitations, prohibitions, and reporting requirements of this Act.”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441i(e)(l)(A) — 2 cases
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “See BCRA § 101(a); FECA § 323(a); 2 U.S.C. § 441i(a) (barring officers of agents of national political party committees from soliciting or directing contributions "that are not subject to the limitations, prohibitions, and reporting requirements of this Act.”
Shays v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 528 F.3d 914 (D.C. Cir. 2008). “2 U.S.C. § 441i(a). Relevant here, the Act required the FEC to develop a new test for determining what advertisements count as “coordinated communications,” BCRA § 214(c), 116 Stat.”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441i(e)(l)(B) — 2 cases
Shays v. United States Fed. Election Comm'n, 508 F. Supp. 2d 10 (D.D.C. 2007). “The Supreme Court specifically noted that 2 U.S.C. §§ 441i(3)(l)(B) and 441i(e)(3) “preserve the traditional role of federal officeholders by providing limited opportunities for federal candidates and officeholders to associate with their state and local colleagues through joint…”
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 540 U.S. 93 (2003). “2 U.S.C.A. § 441i (Supp. 2003). Section 323(f), too, is not narrowly tailored or even close to it.”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441i(e)(l)(B)(i) — 1 case
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “See BCRA § 101(a); FECA § 323(a); 2 U.S.C. § 441i(a) (barring officers of agents of national political party committees from soliciting or directing contributions "that are not subject to the limitations, prohibitions, and reporting requirements of this Act.”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441i(f) — 4 cases
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “See BCRA § 101(a); FECA § 323(a); 2 U.S.C. § 441i(a) (barring officers of agents of national political party committees from soliciting or directing contributions "that are not subject to the limitations, prohibitions, and reporting requirements of this Act.”
Shays v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 337 F. Supp. 2d 28 (D.D.C. 2004). ““The remaining provisions of [2 U.S.C. § 441i] largely reinforce the restrictions of’ 2 U.”
Janvey v. Democratic Senatorial Campaign Comm., Inc., 793 F. Supp. 2d 825 (N.D. Tex. 2011). “Congress placed the bulk of BCRA’s soft money provisions in FECA section 323, eventually codified in 2 U.S.C. § 441i. 47 “Complex as its provisions may be, § 323, in the main, does little more than regulate the ability of wealthy individuals, corporations, and unions to…”
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 540 U.S. 93 (2003). “2 U.S.C.A. § 441i (Supp. 2003). Section 323(f), too, is not narrowly tailored or even close to it.”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441i(f)(1) — 2 cases
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “See BCRA § 101(a); FECA § 323(a); 2 U.S.C. § 441i(a) (barring officers of agents of national political party committees from soliciting or directing contributions "that are not subject to the limitations, prohibitions, and reporting requirements of this Act.”
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 540 U.S. 93 (2003). “2 U.S.C.A. § 441i (Supp. 2003). Section 323(f), too, is not narrowly tailored or even close to it.”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441i(f)(l) — 2 cases
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “See BCRA § 101(a); FECA § 323(a); 2 U.S.C. § 441i(a) (barring officers of agents of national political party committees from soliciting or directing contributions "that are not subject to the limitations, prohibitions, and reporting requirements of this Act.”
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 540 U.S. 93 (2003). “2 U.S.C.A. § 441i (Supp. 2003). Section 323(f), too, is not narrowly tailored or even close to it.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.