2 U.S.C. § 454
Transferred
[transferred]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9
cases, 1975–2004 · leading case: United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2004).
United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2004). “[8] See also 2 U. S. C. § 454 ("If any provision of this Act, or the application thereof to any person or circumstance, is held invalid, the validity of the remainder of the Act and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall not be affected…”
Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U.S. 1 (1976). “All candidates can now spend freely; affluent candidates, after today, can spend their own money without limit; yet, contributions for the ordinary *255 candidate are severely restricted in amountand small contributors are deterred.”
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Nra Political Victory Fund, 6 F.3d 821 (D.C. Cir. 1993). “5 What the Constitution prohibits Congress from doing, and what Congress does in this ease, is to place its agents “beyond the legislative sphere” by naming them to membership on an entity with executive powers. III. There remains the question of remedy.”
Buckley v. Valeo, 519 F.2d 821 (D.C. Cir. 1975). “The Act contains an express severability clause, 2 U.S.C. § 454 , and the plaintiffs concede that this section is severable.”
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Colorado Repub. Fed. Campaign Comm., 41 F. Supp. 2d 1197 (D. Colo. 1999). “FECA contains a strong severability provision: “If any provision of this Act, or the application thereof to any person or circumstance, is held invalid, the validity of the remainder of the Act and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall not be…”
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 540 U.S. 93 (2003). “" 2 U.S.C.A. § 454 note. [81] The disclosure requirements that BCRA § 201 added to FECA § 304 are actually somewhat less intrusive than the comparable requirements that have long applied to persons making independent expenditures.”
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Survival Educ. Fund, Inc., 65 F.3d 285 (2d Cir. 1995). “The severability provision in FECA, 2 U.S.C. § 454 , states that “[i]f any provision of this Act, or the application thereof to any person or circumstance, is held *297 invalid, the validity of the remainder of the Act and the application of such provision to other persons and…”
Athens Lumber Co. v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 689 F.2d 1006 (11th Cir. 1982). “On September 29, 1981, the FEC was afforded an extension of time for filing its answer. The district court’s order granting defendant’s motion to dismiss was not granted until February 9, 1982.”
Beaumont v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 278 F.3d 261 (4th Cir. 2002). “” 2 U.S.C. § 454 . Congress has made its intent clear.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.