20 U.S.C. § 1653
Omitted
[omitted]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1972–1980 · leading case: Tallulah Morgan v. John J. Kerrigan, Boston Home & Sch. Ass'n, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellant. Tallulah Morgan v. John J. Kerrigan, 523 F.2d 917 (1st Cir. 1975).
Tallulah Morgan v. John J. Kerrigan, Boston Home & Sch. Ass'n, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellant. Tallulah Morgan v. John J. Kerrigan, 523 F.2d 917 (1st Cir. 1975). “” While this might seem facially to apply to the order we are dealing with, it is clear in the light of statutory history and all decisions which have addressed the issue that this law does not affect court efforts to eradicate de jure segregation.”
United States v. Sch. Dist. of the City of Ferndale, Michigan, 616 F.2d 895 (6th Cir. 1980). “Section 1752 merely restates the provisions of 20 U.S.C. § 1653 (now expired), which we found inapplicable to an injunction against de jure segregation in N.”
United States v. Price, 577 F.2d 1356 (9th Cir. 1978). “Section 1752 merely restates the provisions of 20 U.S.C. § 1653 (now expired), which we found inapplicable to an injunction against de jure segregation in N.”
Drummond Et Al. v. Acree Et Al., 409 U.S. 1228 (1972). “372 , 20 U. S. C. § 1653 (1970 ed., Supp. II) (emphasis added).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.