Poultry and poultry products are an important source of the Nation’s total supply of food. They are consumed throughout the Nation and the major portion thereof moves in interstate or foreign commerce. It is essential in the public interest that the health and welfare of consumers be protected by assuring that poultry products distributed to them are wholesome, not adulterated, and properly marked, labeled, and packaged. Unwholesome, adulterated, or misbranded poultry products impair the effective regulation of poultry products in interstate or foreign commerce, are injurious to the public welfare, destroy markets for wholesome, not adulterated, and properly labeled and packaged poultry products, and result in sundry losses to poultry producers and processors of poultry and poultry products, as well as injury to consumers. It is hereby found that all articles and poultry which are regulated under this chapter are either in interstate or foreign commerce or substantially affect such commerce, and that regulation by the Secretary of Agriculture and cooperation by the States and other jurisdictions as contemplated by this chapter are appropriate to prevent and eliminate burdens upon such commerce, to effectively regulate such commerce, and to protect the health and welfare of consumers.
Notes of Decisions
Food & Water Watch, Inc. v. Thomas Vilsack, 808 F.3d 905 (D.C. Cir. 2015).
· cites it 3× “” 21 U.S.C. § 451 . The PPIA accomplishes this goal, in part, by requiring the Secretary to ensure that inspectors 1 conduct a post-mortem inspection of all poultry processed for human consumption.”
Robert Cohen v. Conagra Brands, Inc., 16 F.4th 1283 (9th Cir. 2021).
· cites it 2× “These chicken products are produced by ConAgra and similarly 1 21 U.S.C. §§ 451–473. 2 We GRANT the motion of the National Association of Consumer Advocates, et al.”
La Vigne v. Costco Wholesale Corp., 284 F. Supp. 3d 496 (S.D. Ill. 2018).
· cites it 2× “Specifically, the Poultry Products Inspection Act ("PPIA"), 21 U.S.C. §§ 451 - 72, authorizes regulations relating to the disclosure of the amount of water in canned chicken products.”
Christina Webb v. Trader Joe's Co., 999 F.3d 1196 (9th Cir. 2021).
“Congress enacted the PPIA, codified at 21 U.S.C. § 451 , empowering the Secretary of Agriculture to ensure that “poultry products .”
Ass'n Des Eleveurs v. Rob Bonta, 33 F.4th 1107 (9th Cir. 2022).
“” 21 U.S.C. § 451 . It authorizes the Secretary of Agriculture to prescribe “definitions and standards of identity or 10 ASS’N DES ÉLEVEURS DE CANARDS V.”
Physicians Comm. for Responsible Med. v. McDonald's Corp., 187 Cal. App. 4th 554 (Cal. Ct. App. 2010).
· cites it 3× “The Restaurants filed a cross-complaint in October 2008 for a declaration that these potential Proposition 65 warnings were preempted by the federal Poultry Products Inspection Act ( 21 U.S.C. §451 et seq.) (PPIA), because they conflicted with federal policies promoting the…”
Dawkins Ex Rel. Est. of Dawkins v. United States, 226 F. Supp. 2d 750 (M.D.N.C. 2002).
· cites it 5× “2 , the FSIS is charged with implementing several Acts of Congress, among them the Poultry Products Inspection Act, 21 U.S.C. § 451 et seq. (“PPIA”). Implementation of the PPIA is one of the “primary regulatory responsibilities” of the FSIS.”
Calabro v. Aniqa Halal Live Poultry Corp., 650 F.3d 163 (2d Cir. 2011).
“, and the Poultry Products Inspection Act, 21 U.S.C. § 451 et seq. On November 9, 2009, Aniqa filed a notice of removal asserting federal subject-matter jurisdiction on the basis of its third-party claims, thereby removing this action to the United States District Court for the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.