23 U.S.C. § 401
Authority of the Secretary
The Secretary is authorized and directed to assist and cooperate with other Federal departments and agencies, State and local governments, private industry, and other interested parties, to increase highway safety. For the purposes of this chapter, the term “State” means any one of the fifty States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 20
cases, 1969–2015 · leading case: Zivotofsky v. Kerry, 135 S. Ct. 2076 (2015).
Zivotofsky v. Kerry, 135 S. Ct. 2076 (2015). “) Finding recognition in this provision is rather like finding admission to the Union in a provision that treats American Samoa as a State for purposes of a federal highway safety program, 23 U. S. C. §401 . III The Court complains that §214(d) requires the Secretary of State to…”
Miller v. United States, 710 F.2d 656 (10th Cir. 1983). “(FTCA), and the Federal Highway Safety Act, 23 U.S.C. §§ 401 et seq., for personal injuries resulting from an automobile accident which occurred December 18,1977, on U.”
Daye v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 344 F. Supp. 1337 (E.D. Pa. 1972). “, and the Highway Safety Act, 23 U.S.C. § 401 et seq. 4 Specifically, the gravamen of plaintiffs’ allegations is that in the light of the high number of reported accidents along this portion of U.”
Commonwealth v. Barone, 419 A.2d 457 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1980). “” This standard required all states to conduct comparative traffic law studies which would eventually be used to yield state legislation providing for uniform rules of the road within each state and the nation.”
Brennan v. Wisconsin Cent. Ltd., 591 N.E.2d 494 (Ill. App. Ct. 1992). “) Under the Highway Safety Act ( 23 U.S.C. §§401 through 404 (1986)), the Secretary is responsible for developing uniform standards and to approve State-designed highway safety programs as a condition precedent to the State’s receipt of Federal highway funds.”
State v. Eitel, 227 So. 2d 489 (Fla. 1969). “Reversed and remanded. ROBERTS, Acting C.J., and DREW, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ.”
Taylor v. St. Louis Sw. Ry. Co., 746 F. Supp. 50 (D. Kan. 1990). “and the Highway Safety Act, 23 U.S.C. § 401 et seq. upon plaintiffs’ claims that Union Pacific was negligent either with regard to signalization of, or approach grades to, the Williamstown crossing.”
Smith v. Bernier, 701 F. Supp. 1171 (D. Maryland 1988). “As part of their negligence claims, plaintiffs allege that the state defendants, by failing to maintain adequate lighting, warning signs, and traffic control devices at the site of the accident, are liable to them for violation of various highway standards as set forth in the…”
Meyers Et Al. v. Pennsylvania Et Al., 416 U.S. 946 (1974). “” And because of the absence of effective state action, the following year the Congress passed the Highway Safety Act, 23 U. S. C. § 401 et seq., which repealed the former § 135 (see 80 Stat.”
Illinois Marine Towing, Inc. v. Barnick (In Re Barnick), 353 B.R. 233 (Bankr. C.D. Ill. 2006). “Section 405(f)(2) defines the term motor vehicle to mean “a vehicle driven or drawn by mechanical power and manufactured primarily for use on public streets, roads, and highways, but does not include a vehicle operated only on a rail line.” 23 U.”
United States v. David L. Jones, 464 F.2d 1118 (8th Cir. 1972). “The Highway Safety Act of 1966, 23 U.S.C. §§ 401 , 402, made provision for federal funds to assist states in the planning, development and administration of programs designed to realize the objectives of the Act.”
McDaniel v. S. Pac. Transp., 932 F. Supp. 163 (N.D. Tex. 1995). “This mandate implicated the Highway Safety Act (“HSA”), 23 U.S.C.A. §§ 401 ^110, which provides that the Secretary is responsible for developing uniform standards and approving state designed highway safety programs as an antecedent condition to states receiving federal highway…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.