25 U.S.C. § 1300l
Omitted
[omitted]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 2003–2017 · leading case: Jessica Tavares v. Gene Whitehouse, 851 F.3d 863 (9th Cir. 2017).
Jessica Tavares v. Gene Whitehouse, 851 F.3d 863 (9th Cir. 2017). “07, at 97, including the Auburn Indian Restoration Act in 1994, 25 U.S.C. § 1300l–1300l-7. 6 TAVARES V. WHITEHOUSE Today, the historic Band is known as the United Auburn Indian Community (“UAIC” or “Tribe”).”
City of Roseville v. Norton, Gale A., 348 F.3d 1020 (D.C. Cir. 2003). “See 25 U.S.C. § 1300l-(a). Interior Department regulations require the Secretary to consider numerous factors to guide the exercise of discretion in deciding whether or not to take particular lands into trust for a tribe, including “the need of the .”
Stop the Casino 101 Coalition v. Brown, 230 Cal. App. 4th 280 (Cal. Ct. App. 2014). “) Like the Graton Act, the Auburn Indian Restoration Act (25 U.S.C. § 1300l et seq.) provided that property taken in the name of the United States in trust for the tribe “shall be part of the Tribe’s reservation.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.