25 U.S.C. § 1777
Omitted
[omitted]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 2002–2008 · leading case: State v. Romero, 84 P.3d 670 (N.M. Ct. App. 2004).
State v. Romero, 84 P.3d 670 (N.M. Ct. App. 2004). “Congress enacted the SDPCSA as enabling legislation for the settlement of longstanding disputes over lands claimed by Santo Domingo Pueblo, including *676 a dispute arising out of a decision of the Pueblo Lands Board which purported to extinguish Pueblo title to 27,000 acres…”
State v. Quintana, 178 P.3d 820 (N.M. 2008). “…Santo Domingo Pueblo has purchased the land in question pursuant to the Santo Domingo Claims Settlement Act. 25 U.S.C. §§ 1777 (a)-(c) (2000).”
State v. Quintana, 2008 NMCA 025 (N.M. Ct. App. 2006). “{14} Defendant invokes the provisions of the Santo Domingo Pueblo Claims Settlement Act of 2000, 25 U.S.C. §§ 1777 ,1777 a-e (2000) (the Act), to support his contention that the accident site was part of a federal set-aside.”
Pueblo of Santo Domingo v. United States, 54 Fed. Cl. 240 (Fed. Cl. 2002). “In pertinent part, the Settlement Act, now codified at 25 U.S.C. § 1777 (2001), memorializes the compromise and universally settles the Pueblo’s land claims, extinguishes their several lawsuits, provides a plan to distribute title to more than 80,000 acres of public, private,…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.