25 U.S.C. § 389

Investigation and adjustment of irrigation charges on lands within projects on Indian reservations

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 25 CasesGoogle Scholar

The Secretary of the Interior is authorized and directed to cause an investigation to be made to determine whether the owners of non-Indian lands under Indian irrigation projects and under projects where the United States has purchased water rights for Indians are unable to pay irrigation charges, including construction, maintenance, and operating charges, because of inability to operate such lands profitably by reason of lack of fertility of the soil, inadequacy of water supply, defects of irrigation works, or for any other causes. Where the Secretary finds that said landowners are unable to make payment due to the existence of such causes, he may adjust, defer, or cancel such charges, in whole or in part, as the facts and conditions warrant. In adjusting or deferring any such charges the Secretary may enter into contracts with said land owners for the payment of past due charges, but such contracts shall not extend the payment of such charges over a period in excess of ten years.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1958–2008 · leading case: Hackford v. Babbitt, 14 F.3d 1457 (10th Cir. 1994).
Hackford v. Babbitt, 14 F.3d 1457 (10th Cir. 1994). · cites it 2× “1803 (codified at 25 U.S.C. § 389 ). Thereafter, in 1941, because the Indians did not reach the expected level of self-sufficiency, Congress canceled a portion of unpaid construction and operation and maintenance costs to reduce the debt burden on Project lands.”
Scholder v. United States, 428 F.2d 1123 (9th Cir. 1970). “25 U.S.C. § 389 provides in pertinent part: “The Secretary of the Interior is authorized and directed to cause an investigation to be made to determine whether the owners of non-Indian lands under Indian irrigation projects * * * are unable to pay irrigation charges, including…”
Scholder v. United States, 298 F. Supp. 1282 (S.D. Cal. 1969). · cites it 2× “Such an intent is reinforced by the language of 25 U.S.C. § 389 , which includes the following: “The Secretary of the Interior is authorized and directed to cause an investigation to be made to determine whether the owners of non-Indian lands under Indian irrigation projects * *…”
Blackfeet Tribe of Blackfeet Indian Reservation v. Klies Livestock Co., 160 F. Supp. 131 (D. Mont. 1958). · cites it 2× “1803 , 25 U.S.C.A. § 389 ) Congress provided that the Secretary of Interior was “authorized and directed to cause an investigation to be made to determine whether the owners of non-Indian lands under Indian irrigation projects * * * are unable to pay irrigation charges” and…”
Confederated Tribes & Bands v. United States, 296 F. App'x 566 (9th Cir. 2008). “” 25 U.S.C. § 389 ; see also id. § 389a; Irrigation Operation and Maintenance, 73 Fed.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.