25 U.S.C. § 443a
Transferred
[transferred]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1969–1988 · leading case: United States v. Native Vill., 188 Ct. Cl. 1 (Ct. Cl. 1969).
United States v. Native Vill., 188 Ct. Cl. 1 (Ct. Cl. 1969). “Such was the case with 25 U.S.C. § 443a, 70 Stat. 1057 where the provision “For the purpose of this Act, the term ‘Indian’ shall include Eskimos and Aleuts” was added.”
Inter-Tribal Council of Nevada, Inc. v. Hodel, 856 F.2d 1344 (9th Cir. 1988). “There is also a tangential question of standing under 25 U.S.C. § 443a to which appellant makes reference in its brief: “Plaintiff submits that it is an Indian group within the meaning of 25 U.”
Ruff v. Hodel, 770 F.2d 839 (9th Cir. 1985). “, 25 U.S.C. § 443a (Secretary’s “determination” that federal property conveyed to an Indian tribe be forfeited for improper maintenance is “final”); §§ 564b, 677q, 693 (Secretary’s “decisions” on names included in tribal membership roll shall be “final and conclusive”); § 663…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.