25 U.S.C. § 479a
Transferred
[transferred]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 31
cases, 1999–2018 · leading case: Butte Cnty., Cal. v. Hogen, 613 F.3d 190 (D.C. Cir. 2010).
Butte Cnty., Cal. v. Hogen, 613 F.3d 190 (D.C. Cir. 2010). “§ 476 (g); 25 U.S.C. § 479a, Pub.L. 103-454, 108 Stat.”
United Tribe of Shawnee Indians v. United States, 253 F.3d 543 (10th Cir. 2001). “4791 (1994) (codified at 25 U.S.C. § 479a). Section 103 of that Act provides: (3) Indian tribes presently may be recognized by Act of Congress; by the administrative procedures set forth in part 83 of the Code of Federal Regulation denominated “Procedures for Establishing that…”
Carcieri v. Norton, 398 F.3d 22 (1st Cir. 2005). “That statute, codified as 25 U.S.C. § 479a, defines the term “tribe” as “any Indian or Alaska Native tribe, band, na *32 tion, pueblo, village or community that the Secretary of the Interior acknowledges to exist as an Indian tribe.”
State v. Native Vill. of Tanana, 249 P.3d 734 (Alaska 2011). “at 750 (citing 25 U.S.C. § 479a, 479a-1). 57 . Id. (citing Pub.”
Robinson v. Salazar, 885 F. Supp. 2d 1002 (E.D. Cal. 2012). “That statute, codified as 25 U.S.C. § 479a, defines the term “tribe” as “any Indian or Alaska Native tribe, band, nation, pueblo, village or community that the Secretary of the Interior acknowledges to exist as an Indian tribe.”
Robinson v. Salazar, 838 F. Supp. 2d 1006 (E.D. Cal. 2012). “That statute, codified as 25 U.S.C. § 479a, defines the term “tribe” as “any Indian or Alaska Native tribe, band, nation, pueblo, village or community that the Secretary of the Interior acknowledges to exist as an Indian tribe.”
John v. Baker, 982 P.2d 738 (Alaska 1999). “25 U.S.C. § 479a et seq. (West Supp. 1998).”
Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma v. Norton, 389 F.3d 1074 (10th Cir. 2004). “]” 25 U.S.C. §§ 479a(3), 479a-l; 25 C.F.R. § 83.”
Mackinac Tribe v. Jewell, 87 F. Supp. 3d 127 (D.D.C. 2015). “4791 , Section 103 (1994) (codified at 25 U.S.C. § 479a) ("Indian tribes presently may be recognized by Act of Congress; by the administrative procedures set forth in part 83 of the Code of Federal Regulations denominated ‘Procedures for Establishing that an American Indian…”
Tyrus H. Thompson & Ja'Ree C. Thompson v. Fairfax Cnty. Dep't of Fam. Servs., 747 S.E.2d 838 (Va. Ct. App. 2013). “25 U.S.C. § 479a; 25 U.S.C. § 479a-1. See 77 Fed.”
Wolfchild v. United States, 72 Fed. Cl. 511 (Fed. Cl. 2006). “4791 (codified at 25 U.S.C. § 479a). In 1978, the Department of the Interior established an administrative mechanism by which non-recognized tribes could become eligible for federal services and legal protections.”
Sharp Image Gaming, Inc. v. Shingle Springs Band Indians, 223 Cal. Rptr. 3d 362 (Cal. Ct. App. 5th 2017). “(See 25 U.S.C. § 479a -l; 77 Fed.Reg. §§ 47868, 47871 (Aug.”
— 25 U.S.C. § 479a(2) — 9 cases
Carcieri v. Norton, 398 F.3d 22 (1st Cir. 2005). “That statute, codified as 25 U.S.C. § 479a, defines the term “tribe” as “any Indian or Alaska Native tribe, band, na *32 tion, pueblo, village or community that the Secretary of the Interior acknowledges to exist as an Indian tribe.”
Robinson v. Salazar, 838 F. Supp. 2d 1006 (E.D. Cal. 2012). “That statute, codified as 25 U.S.C. § 479a, defines the term “tribe” as “any Indian or Alaska Native tribe, band, nation, pueblo, village or community that the Secretary of the Interior acknowledges to exist as an Indian tribe.”
Robinson v. Salazar, 885 F. Supp. 2d 1002 (E.D. Cal. 2012). “That statute, codified as 25 U.S.C. § 479a, defines the term “tribe” as “any Indian or Alaska Native tribe, band, nation, pueblo, village or community that the Secretary of the Interior acknowledges to exist as an Indian tribe.”
In re C.R.H., 29 P.3d 849 (Alaska 2001).
In Re Crh, 29 P.3d 849 (Alaska 2001).
— 25 U.S.C. § 479a(3) — 4 cases
Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma v. Norton, 389 F.3d 1074 (10th Cir. 2004). “]” 25 U.S.C. §§ 479a(3), 479a-l; 25 C.F.R. § 83.”
Robinson v. Salazar, 885 F. Supp. 2d 1002 (E.D. Cal. 2012). “That statute, codified as 25 U.S.C. § 479a, defines the term “tribe” as “any Indian or Alaska Native tribe, band, nation, pueblo, village or community that the Secretary of the Interior acknowledges to exist as an Indian tribe.”
Richmond v. Wampanoag Tribal Court Cases, 431 F. Supp. 2d 1159 (D. Utah 2006).
State v. White, 556 S.W.3d 110 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.