25 U.S.C. § 5101
Allotment of land on Indian reservations
On and after
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 34
cases (15 in the last 5 years), 2016–2025 · leading case: Stand up for California v. State of Cal., 6 Cal. App. 5th 686 (Cal. Ct. App. 2016).
Stand up for California v. State of Cal., 6 Cal. App. 5th 686 (Cal. Ct. App. 2016). “( 25 U.S.C. §§ 5101 , 5123, 5124; see County of Yakima v.”
Cayuga Nation v. Howard Tanner, 6 F.4th 361 (2d Cir. 2021). “984 , codified as amended at 25 U.S.C. § 5101 et seq. “The intent and purpose of the Reorganization Act was ‘to rehabilitate the Indian’s economic life and to give him a chance to develop the initiative destroyed by a century of oppression and paternalism.”
Brackeen v. Haaland, 994 F.3d 249 (5th Cir. 2021). “984 , codified as amended at 25 U.S.C. §§ 5101 et seq.). The Act, for 19 Case: 18-11479 Document: 00515810731 Page: 27 Date Filed: 04/06/2021 No.”
Agua Caliente Tribe of Cupeno v. Tara Katuk Mac Lean Sweeney, 932 F.3d 1207 (9th Cir. 2019). “984 (1934), 25 U.S.C. §§ 5101–29, “which was intended in part to permit the tribes to set up legal structures designed to aid in self-government,” Kahawaiolaa v.”
Jamul Action Comm. v. E. Sequoyah Simermeyer, 974 F.3d 984 (9th Cir. 2020). “FLETCHER, Circuit Judge: Since at least 1912, a small group of Kumeyaay Indians have lived on a two-acre plot of land in Rancho Jamul, California, deeded to the Roman Catholic Diocese of Monterey and Los Angeles for use as an Indian cemetery.”
Stand Up for California! v. United States Dep't of the Interior, 879 F.3d 1177 (D.C. Cir. 2018). “Department of the Interior (the “Department”) to exercise its authority under the Indian Reorganization Act (IRA), 25 U.S.C. § 5101 et seq., to acquire land “for Indians,” id.”
Club One Casino, Inc. v. David Bernhardt, 959 F.3d 1142 (9th Cir. 2020). “In March 2005, the North Fork applied to the Department of the Interior to have a 305-acre plot of land in Madera County taken into trust by the United States pursuant to section 5108 of the Indian Reorganization Act (“IRA”), 25 U.S.C. §§ 5101–5144. The Tribe proposes to…”
Koi Nation of N. Cal. v. U.S. Dep't of the Interior, 361 F. Supp. 3d 14 (D.C. Cir. 2019). “, IGRA, and the Indian Reorganization Act ("IRA"), 25 U.S.C. §§ 5101 et seq. See Compl. ¶¶ 10, 82-124, ECF No.”
United Auburn Indian Cmty. of the Auburn Rancheria v. Brown, 4 Cal. App. 5th 36 (Cal. Ct. App. 2016). “First, former section 465 of title 25 of the United States Code, which is now found at 25 United States Code section 5108 , is part of the Indian Reorganization Act ( 25 U.S.C. § 5101 et seq.; hereafter IRA).”
JoAnn Chase v. Andeavor Logistics, L.P., 12 F.4th 864 (8th Cir. 2021). “984 , codified as amended at 25 U.S.C. § 5101 et seq.; see §§ 5101, 5102.”
Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah & Ouray Indian v. United States, 99 F.4th 1353 (Fed. Cir. 2024). “25 U.S.C. § 5101 et seq. The Tribe occupies the Uintah and Ouray Indian Res- ervation (“Reservation”), which encompasses about four million acres in the Green River Basin of northeastern Utah and lies within the drainage of the Colorado River Basin.”
Fmc Corp. v. Shoshone-Bannock Tribes, 942 F.3d 916 (9th Cir. 2019). “The Tribes are organized under the Indian Reorganization Act of 1934, 25 U.S.C. §§ 5101 et seq., and are governed by the Fort Hall Business Council, a legislative body consisting of seven elected members.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.