U.S. Code » Title 25 » Chapter CHAPTER 14— MISCELLANEOUS › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER XL— MENOMINEE TRIBE OF WISCONSIN: TERMINATION OF FEDERAL SUPERVISION

25 U.S.C. § 896

Repealed. Pub. L. 93–197, § 3(b), Dec. 22, 1973, 87 Stat. 770

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 25 CasesGoogle Scholar

[repealed]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1967–2015 · leading case: The Menominee Tribe of Indians, and Cross-Appellees v. The United States, and Cross-Appellant
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
The Menominee Tribe of Indians, and Cross-Appellees v. The United States, and Cross-Appellant (1984) cafc · cites it 2× “25 U.S.C. § 896 ; 26 Fed.Reg. 3726. On April 26, 1961, the Secretary of the Interior, pursuant to 25 U.”
Menominee Tribe of Indians v. United States (1979) cc “The only specific provisions of the Termination Act now invoked by plaintiffs are the parts of 25 U.S.C. § 896 relating to the preparation and adoption of a plan for the future control of the tribal property and service functions.”
The Menominee Tribe of Indians v. The United States (1983) cafc · cites it 3× “25 U.S.C. § 896 (1964 ed.). Under Menominee Basie this sustained yield provision, which Congress specifically enacted in the Termination Act, could not be challenged in the Court of Claims as a breach of fiduciary duty.”
United States v. Theodore Floyd Burland (1971) ca9 “§ 703 ; Menominee Tribe of Wisconsin, 25 U.S.C. § 896 (see Act Aug. 24, 1954, Pub.”
Menominee Tribe of Indians v. United States (1967) cc “549 , 25 U.S.C. § 896 (1964). The Act provided further that upon the submission of such a plan by the tribe and its approval by the Secretary of the Interior, he would issue a proclamation containing the plan and his approval thereof.”
Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin v. United States (1997) uscfc “” 25 U.S.C. § 896 (1970) (repealed 1973). It would appear, therefore, that the second count cannot state a legal or equitable claim for the same reason that count one is barred.”
Two Shields v. United States (2015) uscfc “As for the initial, threshold hurdle, plaintiffs rely on the Indian Long-Term Leasing Act, 25 U.S.C. § 896 . As explained above, this general leasing statute does create an enforceable fiduciary duty to maximize the economic value of plaintiffs’ allotments.”
Irvin Otradovec, Sr. v. First Wisconsin Trust Co. Of Milwaukee, Wisconsin (1972) ca1 “Earlier in 1961, pursuant to 25 U.S.C. § 896 , a Termination Plan for Menominee Indians was published in 26 Fed.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.