26 U.S.C. § 362

Basis to corporations

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 26 CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Property acquired by issuance of stock or as paid-in surplusIf property was acquired by a corporation—(1) in connection with a transaction to which section 351 (relating to transfer of property to corporation controlled by transferor) applies, or(2) as paid-in surplus or as a contribution to capital,then the basis shall be the same as it would be in the hands of the transferor, increased in the amount of gain recognized to the transferor on such transfer.(b) Transfers to corporations

If property was acquired by a corporation in connection with a reorganization to which this part applies, then the basis shall be the same as it would be in the hands of the transferor, increased in the amount of gain recognized to the transferor on such transfer. This subsection shall not apply if the property acquired consists of stock or securities in a corporation a party to the reorganization, unless acquired by the exchange of stock or securities of the transferee (or of a corporation which is in control of the transferee) as the consideration in whole or in part for the transfer.

(c) Special rule for certain contributions to capital(1) Property other than moneyNotwithstanding subsection (a)(2), if property other than money—(A) is acquired by a corporation as a contribution to capital, and(B) is not contributed by a shareholder as such,then the basis of such property shall be zero.(2) MoneyNotwithstanding subsection (a)(2), if money—(A) is received by a corporation as a contribution to capital, and(B) is not contributed by a shareholder as such,then the basis of any property acquired with such money during the 12-month period beginning on the day the contribution is received shall be reduced by the amount of such contribution. The excess (if any) of the amount of such contribution over the amount of the reduction under the preceding sentence shall be applied to the reduction (as of the last day of the period specified in the preceding sentence) of the basis of any other property held by the taxpayer. The particular properties to which the reductions required by this paragraph shall be allocated shall be determined under regulations prescribed by the Secretary.(d) Limitation on basis increase attributable to assumption of liability(1) In general

In no event shall the basis of any property be increased under subsection (a) or (b) above the fair market value of such property (determined without regard to section 7701(g)) by reason of any gain recognized to the transferor as a result of the assumption of a liability.

(2) Treatment of gain not subject to taxExcept as provided in regulations, if—(A) gain is recognized to the transferor as a result of an assumption of a nonrecourse liability by a transferee which is also secured by assets not transferred to such transferee; and(B) no person is subject to tax under this title on such gain,then, for purposes of determining basis under subsections (a) and (b), the amount of gain recognized by the transferor as a result of the assumption of the liability shall be determined as if the liability assumed by the transferee equaled such transferee’s ratable portion of such liability determined on the basis of the relative fair market values (determined without regard to section 7701(g)) of all of the assets subject to such liability.(e) Limitations on built-in losses(1) Limitation on importation of built-in losses(A) In general

If in any transaction described in subsection (a) or (b) there would (but for this subsection) be an importation of a net built-in loss, the basis of each property described in subparagraph (B) which is acquired in such transaction shall (notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b)) be its fair market value immediately after such transaction.

(B) Property describedFor purposes of subparagraph (A), property is described in this subparagraph if—(i) gain or loss with respect to such property is not subject to tax under this subtitle in the hands of the transferor immediately before the transfer, and(ii) gain or loss with respect to such property is subject to such tax in the hands of the transferee immediately after such transfer.In any case in which the transferor is a partnership, the preceding sentence shall be applied by treating each partner in such partnership as holding such partner’s proportionate share of the property of such partnership.(C) Importation of net built-in loss

For purposes of subparagraph (A), there is an importation of a net built-in loss in a transaction if the transferee’s aggregate adjusted bases of property described in subparagraph (B) which is transferred in such transaction would (but for this paragraph) exceed the fair market value of such property immediately after such transaction.

(2) Limitation on transfer of built-in losses in section 351 transactions(A) In generalIf—(i) property is transferred by a transferor in any transaction which is described in subsection (a) and which is not described in paragraph (1) of this subsection, and(ii) the transferee’s aggregate adjusted bases of such property so transferred would (but for this paragraph) exceed the fair market value of such property immediately after such transaction,then, notwithstanding subsection (a), the transferee’s aggregate adjusted bases of the property so transferred shall not exceed the fair market value of such property immediately after such transaction.(B) Allocation of basis reduction

The aggregate reduction in basis by reason of subparagraph (A) shall be allocated among the property so transferred in proportion to their respective built-in losses immediately before the transaction.

(C) Election to apply limitation to transferor’s stock basis(i) In generalIf the transferor and transferee of a transaction described in subparagraph (A) both elect the application of this subparagraph—(I) subparagraph (A) shall not apply, and(II) the transferor’s basis in the stock received for property to which subparagraph (A) does not apply by reason of the election shall not exceed its fair market value immediately after the transfer.(ii) Election

Any election under clause (i) shall be made at such time and in such form and manner as the Secretary may prescribe, and, once made, shall be irrevocable.

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 118; Pub. L. 90–621, § 2(b), Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1311; Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, § 1906(b)(13)(A), title XXI, § 2120(b), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1834, 1913; Pub. L. 99–514, title VIII, § 824(b), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2374; Pub. L. 106–36, title III, § 3001(b)(2), June 25, 1999, 113 Stat. 182; Pub. L. 108–357, title VIII, § 836(a), Oct. 22, 2004, 118 Stat. 1594; Pub. L. 109–135, title IV, § 403(dd)(2), Dec. 21, 2005, 119 Stat. 2631; Pub. L. 113–295, div. A, title II, § 221(a)(51), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 4045; Pub. L. 115–141, div. U, title IV, § 401(a)(67), Mar. 23, 2018, 132 Stat. 1187.)Editorial NotesAmendments

2018—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 115–141 struck out comma after “acquired” in introductory provisions.

2014—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 113–295 struck out “on or after June 22, 1954” after “If property was acquired” in introductory provisions.

Subsec. (c)(1)(A), (2)(A). Pub. L. 113–295 struck out “, on or after June 22, 1954,” after “by a corporation”.

2005—Subsec. (e)(2)(C)(ii). Pub. L. 109–135 reenacted heading without change and amended text generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: “An election under clause (i) shall be included with the return of tax for the taxable year in which the transaction occurred, shall be in such form and manner as the Secretary may prescribe, and, once made, shall be irrevocable.”

2004—Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 108–357 added subsec. (e).

1999—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 106–36 added subsec. (d).

1986—Subsec. (c)(3). Pub. L. 99–514 struck out par. (3) relating to exceptions for contributions in aid of construction.

1976—Subsec. (c)(2)(B). Pub. L. 94–455, § 1906(b)(13)(A), struck out “or his delegate” after “Secretary”.

Subsec. (c)(3). Pub. L. 94–455, § 2120(b), added par. (3).

1968—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 90–621 substituted the exchange of stock or securities of the transferee (or of a corporation which is in control of the transferee) for the issuance of stock or securities of the transferee as the transaction rendering the subsection applicable.

Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective Date of 2014 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 113–295 effective Dec. 19, 2014, subject to a savings provision, see section 221(b) of Pub. L. 113–295, set out as a note under section 1 of this title.

Effective Date of 2005 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 109–135 effective as if included in the provision of the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, Pub. L. 108–357, to which such amendment relates, see section 403(nn) of Pub. L. 109–135, set out as a note under section 26 of this title.

Effective Date of 2004 Amendment

Pub. L. 108–357, title VIII, § 836(c)(1), Oct. 22, 2004, 118 Stat. 1596, provided that: “The amendment made by subsection (a) [amending this section] shall apply to transactions after the date of the enactment of this Act [Oct. 22, 2004].”

Effective Date of 1999 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 106–36 applicable to transfers after Oct. 18, 1998, see section 3001(e) of Pub. L. 106–36, set out as a note under section 351 of this title.

Effective Date of 1986 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 99–514 applicable to amounts received after Dec. 31, 1986, in taxable years ending after such date, with certain exceptions and qualifications, see section 824(c) of Pub. L. 99–514, set out as a note under section 118 of this title.

Effective Date of 1976 Amendment

Amendment by section 2120(b) of Pub. L. 94–455 applicable to contributions made after Jan. 31, 1976, see section 2120(c) of Pub. L. 94–455, set out as a note under section 118 of this title.

Effective Date of 1968 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 90–621 applicable only in respect of plans of reorganization adopted after Oct. 22, 1968, see section 2(c) of Pub. L. 90–621, set out as a note under section 358 of this title.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 21 cases, 1960–2011 · leading case: United States v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R.R., 412 U.S. 401 (1973).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

United States v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R.R., 412 U.S. 401 (1973). · cites it 14× “…that the subsidies qualified as contributions to the railroad's capital under §§ 362 and 1052 (c) of that *404 Code, 26 U. S. C. §§ 362 and 1052 (c), and under § 113 (a) (8) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939. In arriving at this conclusion, the Court of Claims majority…”

Centex Corp. v. United States, 395 F.3d 1283 (Fed. Cir. 2005). · cites it 2× “In particular, the treatment of FSLIC-assisted transfers as tax-free reorganizations meant that the tax basis of the transferred assets would remain “the same as it would be in the hands of the transferor.”

Washington Mut. Inc. v. United States, 636 F.3d 1207 (9th Cir. 2011). · cites it 3× “§ 1012 , the general cost-basis rule, $63,000,000 under 26 U.S.C. § 362 (b), the carryover-basis rule applicable to tax-free reorganizations, or $63,000,000 under 26 U.”

Vets. Found. v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue, 317 F.2d 456 (10th Cir. 1963). · cites it 4× “The Tax Court held that each donation of used property constituted a contribution to the capital of the taxpayer under 26 U.S.C. § 362 (c), and that the basis of such property should be zero.”

G.M. Trading Corp. v. Comm'r, 121 F.3d 977 (5th Cir. 1997). “See 26 U.S.C. § 362 (c)(1). Therefore, G.M. presumably will pay taxes on the contribution when it sells or liquidates the factory.”

Hmw Indus., Inc. v. Rueben B. Wheatley, Comm'r of Fin., Gov't of the Virgin Islands, 504 F.2d 146 (3rd Cir. 1974). · cites it 2× “To hold the subsidies which were paid to STC taxable under 26 U.S.C. § 362 (c) (2) would be contrary to both the letter and spirit of the Industrial Incentive Program Legislation and would frustrate the legislative intent so clearly expressed by the Virgin Islands Legislature…”

Fed. Employees'Distrib. Co. v. United States, 206 F. Supp. 330 (S.D. Cal. 1962). · cites it 2× “] In the alternative, defendant further contends that, should such fees not be characterized as “income”, then the Government would, in all events, be entitled to recoupment pursuant to § 362(c) (2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 [ 26 U.S.C. § 362 (c) (2)], resulting from…”

Coltec Indus., Inc. v. United States, 62 Fed. Cl. 716 (Fed. Cl. 2004). “” 26 U.S.C. § 362 (a)(1); see also 26 U.S.C.”

Gyro Eng'g Corp., a California Corp. v. United States, 417 F.2d 437 (9th Cir. 1969). “The district court, declaring that the transaction in substance was little more than “a paper tax device or ‘gimmick’,” concluded that the transfer was not pursuant to sale but rather was a contribution by the Mowrys to Gyro’s capital; it applied 26 U.”

Washington Mut. Inc. ex rel. H.F. Ahmanson & Co. v. United States, 636 F.3d 1207 (9th Cir. 2011). · cites it 3× “§ 1012 , the general cost-basis rule, $63,000,000 under 26 U.S.C. § 362 (b), the carryover-basis rule applicable to tax-free reorganizations, or $63,000,000 under 26 U.”

Cmty. TV Ass'n of Havre v. United States, 203 F. Supp. 270 (D. Mont. 1962). “of Wyoming Valley, insofar as section 118(a) is concerned the same rule is applicable with respect to payments by shareholders of a corporation, and it must be determined in each case whether the payment was in fact a capital contribution or a payment for service.”

Hayutin v. Comm'r, 508 F.2d 462 (10th Cir. 1974). “26 U.S.C. § 362 . Payments were not refundable under any circumstance, even if the potential use of the land did not require water service.”

Show all 21 citing cases →

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.