26 U.S.C. § 6665
Applicable rules
Section applicable to returns the due date for which (determined without regard to extensions) is after
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 20
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1990–2023 · leading case: Seven-Sky v. Holder, 661 F.3d 1 (D.C. Cir. 2011).
Seven-Sky v. Holder, 661 F.3d 1 (D.C. Cir. 2011). “, 26 U.S.C. §§ 6665 (a), 6671(a). [12] The majority opinion's fixation on the "penalty" label causes it to neglect the basic text and structure of the Tax Code.”
Kevin J. Morse v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue Serv., 419 F.3d 829 (8th Cir. 2005). “Civil fraud penalties are imposed administratively, see 26 U.S.C. § 6665 , and the Supreme Court has stated this is “prima facie evidence that Congress intended to provide for a civil sanction,” Hudson, 522 U.”
In re Wyly, 552 B.R. 338 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 2016). “§ 6663 is a part of the chapter to which § 6665 refers, and could thus be encompassed by the language of § 6501 referring to "taxes.”
Daniel L. Carroll & Ingrid N. Carroll, Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants v. United States of Am., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee, 339 F.3d 61 (2d Cir. 2003). “See 26 U.S.C. § 6665 (a)(2) (“[A]ny reference in this title to ‘tax’ imposed by this title shall be deemed also to refer to the additions to the tax, additional amounts, and penalties provided by this chapter.”
Donald G. Smith v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue, 926 F.2d 1470 (6th Cir. 1991). “It is now found in substantially similar form at 26 U.S.C. § 6665 (1990), . Rule 55(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides in part: "When a party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise defend as provided by those…”
Gray v. Comm'r, 723 F.3d 790 (7th Cir. 2013). “§ 6651 (a)(1), (2). Although Gray challenged her penalties in the CDP hearing, these statutory penalties (technically “additions to” tax) are not themselves deficiencies.”
Maze v. Internal Revenue Serv., 862 F.3d 1087 (D.C. Cir. 2017). “” 26 U.S.C. § 6665 (a)(2) (emphasis added).”
Liberty Univ. v. Timothy Geithner, 671 F.3d 391 (4th Cir. 2011). “, 26 U.S.C. §§ 6665 (a)(2), 6671(a) (directing that “tax” be “deemed also to refer to .”
Springer v. Internal Revenue Serv. Ex Rel. United States, 231 F. App'x 793 (10th Cir. 2007). “Because penalties and interest arising from the failure to pay taxes are assessed as taxes, see 26 U.S.C. § 6665 (a)(2), the AIA bars actions seeking to enjoin their assessment.”
Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v. Gov't of the Virgin Islands of the United States, 173 F. Supp. 2d 386 (D.V.I. 2001). “26 U.S.C. § 6665 (a). Finally, section 6671(a) provides: *391 Penalty assessed as tax.”
Greenhouse v. United States, 738 F. Supp. 709 (S.D.N.Y. 1990). “” 26 U.S.C. § 6665 (a)(2). 8 We agree with the government that the statutes cited above make it clear that plaintiffs’ first cause of action is a suit to restrain the collection of “tax,” as that term is defined in the Internal Revenue Code.”
United States v. Paul Wommer, 584 F. App'x 815 (9th Cir. 2014). “, 26 U.S.C. § 6665 (a)(2) (“[A]ny reference in this title to ‘tax’ imposed by this title shall be deemed also to refer to the additions to the tax, additional amounts, and penalties provided by this chapter [Subtitle F, Chapter 68].”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.