26 U.S.C. § 7426

Civil actions by persons other than taxpayers

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 26 CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Actions permitted(1) Wrongful levy

If a levy has been made on property or property has been sold pursuant to a levy, any person (other than the person against whom is assessed the tax out of which such levy arose) who claims an interest in or lien on such property and that such property was wrongfully levied upon may bring a civil action against the United States in a district court of the United States. Such action may be brought without regard to whether such property has been surrendered to or sold by the Secretary.

(2) Surplus proceeds

If property has been sold pursuant to a levy, any person (other than the person against whom is assessed the tax out of which such levy arose) who claims an interest in or lien on such property junior to that of the United States and to be legally entitled to the surplus proceeds of such sale may bring a civil action against the United States in a district court of the United States.

(3) Substituted sale proceeds

If property has been sold pursuant to an agreement described in section 6325(b)(3) (relating to substitution of proceeds of sale), any person who claims to be legally entitled to all or any part of the amount held as a fund pursuant to such agreement may bring a civil action against the United States in a district court of the United States.

(4) Substitution of value

If a certificate of discharge is issued to any person under section 6325(b)(4) with respect to any property, such person may, within 120 days after the day on which such certificate is issued, bring a civil action against the United States in a district court of the United States for a determination of whether the value of the interest of the United States (if any) in such property is less than the value determined by the Secretary. No other action may be brought by such person for such a determination.

(b) AdjudicationThe district court shall have jurisdiction to grant only such of the following forms of relief as may be appropriate in the circumstances:(1) Injunction

If a levy or sale would irreparably injure rights in property which the court determines to be superior to rights of the United States in such property, the court may grant an injunction to prohibit the enforcement of such levy or to prohibit such sale.

(2) Recovery of propertyIf the court determines that such property has been wrongfully levied upon, the court may—(A) order the return of specific property if the United States is in possession of such property;(B) grant a judgment for the amount of money levied upon; or(C) if such property was sold, grant a judgment for an amount not exceeding the greater of—(i) the amount received by the United States from the sale of such property, or(ii) the fair market value of such property immediately before the levy.For the purposes of subparagraph (C), if the property was declared purchased by the United States at a sale pursuant to section 6335(e) (relating to manner and conditions of sale), the United States shall be treated as having received an amount equal to the minimum price determined pursuant to such section or (if larger) the amount received by the United States from the resale of such property.(3) Surplus proceeds

If the court determines that the interest or lien of any party to an action under this section was transferred to the proceeds of a sale of such property, the court may grant a judgment in an amount equal to all or any part of the amount of the surplus proceeds of such sale.

(4) Substituted sale proceeds

If the court determines that a party has an interest in or lien on the amount held as a fund pursuant to an agreement described in section 6325(b)(3) (relating to substitution of proceeds of sale), the court may grant a judgment in an amount equal to all or any part of the amount of such fund.

(5) Substitution of value

If the court determines that the Secretary’s determination of the value of the interest of the United States in the property for purposes of section 6325(b)(4) exceeds the actual value of such interest, the court shall grant a judgment ordering a refund of the amount deposited, and a release of the bond, to the extent that the aggregate of the amounts thereof exceeds such value determined by the court.

For purposes of an adjudication under this section, the assessment of tax upon which the interest or lien of the United States is based shall be conclusively presumed to be valid.

(d) Limitation on rights of action

No action may be maintained against any officer or employee of the United States (or former officer or employee) or his personal representative with respect to any acts for which an action could be maintained under this section.

(e) Substitution of United States as party

If an action, which could be brought against the United States under this section, is improperly brought against any officer or employee of the United States (or former officer or employee) or his personal representative, the court shall order, upon such terms as are just, that the pleadings be amended to substitute the United States as a party for such officer or employee as of the time such action was commenced upon proper service of process on the United States.

(f) Provision inapplicable

The provisions of section 7422(a) (relating to prohibition of suit prior to filing claim for refund) shall not apply to actions under this section.

(g) InterestInterest shall be allowed at the overpayment rate established under section 6621—(1) in the case of a judgment pursuant to subsection (b)(2)(B), from the date the Secretary receives the money wrongfully levied upon to the date of payment of such judgment;(2) in the case of a judgment pursuant to subsection (b)(2)(C), from the date of the sale of the property wrongfully levied upon to the date of payment of such judgment; and(3) in the case of a judgment pursuant to subsection (b)(5) which orders a refund of any amount, from the date the Secretary received such amount to the date of payment of such judgment.(h) Recovery of damages permitted in certain cases(1) In generalNotwithstanding subsection (b), if, in any action brought under this section, there is a finding that any officer or employee of the Internal Revenue Service recklessly or intentionally, or by reason of negligence, disregarded any provision of this title the defendant shall be liable to the plaintiff in an amount equal to the lesser of $1,000,000 ($100,000 in the case of negligence) or the sum of—(A) actual, direct economic damages sustained by the plaintiff as a proximate result of the reckless or intentional or negligent disregard of any provision of this title by the officer or employee (reduced by any amount of such damages awarded under subsection (b)); and(B) the costs of the action.(2) Requirement that administrative remedies be exhausted; mitigation; period

The rules of section 7433(d) shall apply for purposes of this subsection.

(3) Payment authority

Claims pursuant to this section shall be payable out of funds appropriated under section 1304 of title 31, United States Code.

(i) Cross reference

For period of limitation, see section 6532(c).

(Added Pub. L. 89–719, title I, § 110(a), Nov. 2, 1966, 80 Stat. 1142; amended Pub. L. 93–625, § 7(a)(2)(E), Jan. 3, 1975, 88 Stat. 2115; Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, § 1906(b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1834; Pub. L. 97–248, title III, § 350(a), Sept. 3, 1982, 96 Stat. 639; Pub. L. 99–514, title XV, § 1511(c)(16), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2745; Pub. L. 105–206, title III, §§ 3102(b), 3106(b)(1), (2), July 22, 1998, 112 Stat. 730, 733.)Editorial NotesAmendments

1998—Subsec. (a)(4). Pub. L. 105–206, § 3106(b)(1), added par. (4).

Subsec. (b)(5). Pub. L. 105–206, § 3106(b)(2)(A), added par. (5).

Subsec. (g)(3). Pub. L. 105–206, § 3106(b)(2)(B), added par. (3).

Subsecs. (h), (i). Pub. L. 105–206, § 3102(b), added subsec. (h) and redesignated former subsec. (h) as (i).

1986—Subsec. (g). Pub. L. 99–514 substituted “the overpayment rate established under section 6621” for “an annual rate established under section 6621”.

1982—Subsec. (b)(2)(C). Pub. L. 97–248 inserted “if such property was sold,” before “grant a judgment” and “the greater of—” after “not exceeding”, redesignated remaining provisions as cl. (i), and added cl. (ii).

1976—Pub. L. 94–455 struck out “or his delegate” after “Secretary” wherever appearing.

1975—Subsec. (g). Pub. L. 93–625 substituted “an annual rate established under section 6621” for “the rate of 6 percent per annum”.

Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective Date of 1998 Amendment

Pub. L. 105–206, title III, § 3102(d), July 22, 1998, 112 Stat. 731, provided that: “The amendments made by this section [amending this section and section 7433 of this title] shall apply to actions of officers or employees of the Internal Revenue Service after the date of the enactment of this Act [July 22, 1998].”

Amendment by section 3106(b)(1), (2) of Pub. L. 105–206 effective July 22, 1998, see section 3106(c) of Pub. L. 105–206, set out as a note under section 6325 of this title.

Effective Date of 1986 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 99–514 applicable for purposes of determining interest for periods after Dec. 31, 1986, see section 1511(d) of Pub. L. 99–514, set out as a note under section 47 of this title.

Effective Date of 1982 Amendment

Pub. L. 97–248, title III, § 350(b), Sept. 3, 1982, 96 Stat. 639, provided that: “The amendment made by subsection (a) [amending this section] shall apply with respect to levies made after December 31, 1982.”

Effective Date of 1975 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 93–625 effective July 1, 1975, and applicable to amounts outstanding on such date or arising thereafter, see section 7(e) of Pub. L. 93–625, set out as an Effective Date note under section 6621 of this title.

Effective Date

Section applicable after Nov. 2, 1966, regardless of when title or lien of United States arose or when lien or interest of another person was acquired, except in a case in which a lien or title derived from enforcement of a lien held by United States has been enforced by a civil action or suit which has become final by judgment, sale, or agreement before Nov. 2, 1966, or in a case in which section would impair a priority held by any person other than United States holding a lien or interest prior to Nov. 2, 1966, operate to increase liability of such person, or shorten time of bringing suit with respect to transactions occurring before Nov. 2, 1966, see section 114(a)–(c) of Pub. L. 89–719, set out as Effective Date of 1966 Amendments note under section 6323 of this title.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 560 cases (29 in the last 5 years), 1967–2026 · leading case: Interfirst Bank Dallas, N.A. v. United States of Am., & Internal Revenue Serv., Defendants, 769 F.2d 299 (1st Cir. 1985).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Interfirst Bank Dallas, N.A. v. United States of Am., & Internal Revenue Serv., Defendants, 769 F.2d 299 (1st Cir. 1985). · cites it 10× “Interfirst brought suit against the government on November 4, 1982, alleging common law conversion and wrongful levy, 26 U.S.C. § 7426 , and claiming damages of $438,466.”

United States v. Nat'l Bank of Com., 472 U.S. 713 (1985). · cites it 4× “, 29 (1966), and when it provided in § 7426 of the Code, 26 U. S. C. § 7426 , that one claiming an interest in property seized for another's taxes may bring a civil action against the United States to have the property or the proceeds of its sale returned.”

Towe Antique Ford Found., a Nonprofit Montana Corp. v. Internal Revenue Serv. Dep't of Treasury United States of Am., 999 F.2d 1387 (9th Cir. 1993). · cites it 7× “ALARCON, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff-Appellant Towe Antique Ford Foundation (“TAFF”), a nonprofit charitable corporation incorporated under Montana law, appeals from the judgment in favor of the United States in this wrongful levy action brought pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 7426 . TAFF…”

Earl Winebrenner v. United States, 924 F.2d 851 (9th Cir. 1991). · cites it 8× “§ 2410 and 26 U.S.C. § 7426 and general damages. On July 27, 1988, the district court dismissed the wrongful levy action for failing to file *853 within the limitations period and the claim for general damages.”

Mallard Auto. Grp., Ltd. v. United States, 343 F. Supp. 2d 949 (D. Nev. 2004). · cites it 7× “Factual and Procedural Background In its complaint (#2), plaintiff asserts four claims for relief: (1) Wrongful Levy pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 7426 ; (2) Refund pursuant to 26 U.”

Marlin Arford Wanda Arford v. United States, 934 F.2d 229 (9th Cir. 1991). · cites it 6× “3 The Arfords alleged sovereign immunity was waived by 26 U.S.C. § 7426 as to the requested recovery relief and 28 U.”

United States v. Williams, 514 U.S. 527 (1995). · cites it 4× “The first lien on her property, for nearly $15,000, was filed just six months before the closing; and liens in larger sumover $26,000, out of $41,937were filed only 11 days before the closing.”

Baddour, Inc. & Bmc Sales, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees-Appellants v. United States of Am., Michael E. Posey, 802 F.2d 801 (5th Cir. 1986). · cites it 7× “It held, however, that *803 Baddour was entitled to recover under 26 U.S.C.A. § 7426 (b)(2) (West 1967), amended by 26 U.”

EC Term of Years Trust v. United States, 550 U.S. 429 (2007). · cites it 3× “This is a challenge to the Internal Revenue Service’s levy upon the property of a trust, to collect taxes owed by another, an action specifically authorized by 26 U. S. C. § 7426 (a)(1), but subject to a statutory filing deadline the trust missed.”

Valley Fin., Inc. v. United States, 629 F.2d 162 (D.C. Cir. 1980). · cites it 5× “In an action brought under 26 U.S.C. § 7426 (a) 1 and 28 U.S.C. § 2410 2 Pacific sought return of its property and damages.”

Supermail Cargo, Inc. v. United States, 68 F.3d 1204 (9th Cir. 1995). · cites it 3× “(“Supermail”) brought this action under 26 U.S.C. § 7426 , alleging that the IRS wrongfully levied upon customs refunds owed to Supermail.”

Four Rivers Investments, Inc. v. United States, 77 Fed. Cl. 592 (Fed. Cl. 2007). · cites it 7× “In an unpublished opinion, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida has described the relevant tax code changes: The facts of [this] case fall under the scope of 26 U.”

Show all 560 citing cases →

— 26 U.S.C. § 7426(a) — 3 cases

Gold Forever Music, Inc. v. United States (E.D. Mich. 2019).

Alabama Exch. Bank v. United States, 400 F. Supp. 92 (M.D. Ala. 1975).

Tompkins & McMaster v. United States (4th Cir. 1996).

— 26 U.S.C. § 7426(a)(1) — 1 case

Kentucky ex rel. United Pac. Ins. v. Laurel Cnty., 869 F.2d 985 (6th Cir. 1989).

— 26 U.S.C. § 7426(b) — 1 case

Henry Vlietstra Plastering & Acoustical Co. v. Internal Revenue Serv., 401 F. Supp. 829 (W.D. Mich. 1975).

— 26 U.S.C. § 7426(c) — 3 cases

Stuyvesant Ins. Co. v. Dep't of Treasury, 378 F. Supp. 7 (S.D.N.Y. 1974).

Bailey v. United States, 415 F. Supp. 1305 (D.N.J. 1976).

Neely v. United States, 357 F. Supp. 713 (S.D. Fla. 1973).

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.